|
||||||||
TNA Wrestling on Challenge TV (Part 2) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#4651 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
What would internet debate be without constant straw-manning, eh?
![]() I've never said TNA should be absolved from its failures, and I've never said it never stood a chance. It's screwed up loads of times, and it probably did have a chance to grow into something bigger around 2009. A chance which it blew. What I'm actually saying here is that WWE's current de facto monopoly in the US is bad for wrestling, which it clearly is. And although TNA did screw up, the bigger picture is that WWE's dominance has crushed the demand for a second US promotion, which it has. And with NXT, deliberately and cynically so. Watch WWE now crush RoH in exactly the way it did TNA. And watch the WWE apologists try and make out that it's somehow a good thing. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#4652 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17,297
|
wwe doesnt even know tna exists probably lol
sorry seibu you know i stick up for tna when required but i dont see how wwe putting on poor raw week after week is killing tna. wcw tooka dvantage of poor wwe product. why hasnt tna? ill tell you why because they let the best booker in wrestling go. screw tna!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4653 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37,008
|
Quote:
What has WWE done to "crush" TNA? I'm genuinely looking forward to examples of WWE doing any form of damage to TNA's reputation.
They ignored them becuase TNA was no threat. Only time WWE did anything was a few legal things over copyrighted names which they would have done to anybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4654 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
Quote:
you said taker was frail and couldnt move prior to mania. he entered bulky and had a good match with bray wyatt. its that simple
Quote:
we have heard how 1 bump could hurt angle for 5 years now, yet hes still ok. and his matches are better than alot of wrestlers who are fully fit. as i said though i would like him to work reduced schedule in wwe, he is wasted in TNA
A man with all the neck issues he's had over the years IS only one bad bump away from being paralysed. Just because he's managed to avoid it to this point doesn't mean it's a good idea to keep good. I think his performances have declined a lot too. And a lot of these guys pull themselves together for going on screen and actually look a lot worse backstage. I can envision Angle being a wreck off camera.Quote:
as for nxt, you know i am a big fan, it is more enjoyable than tna by a country mile. but it would not be without wwe. it did not have to go through the challenges tna has. glad we agree on that.
I think it's hard to even compare the two (TNA and NXT) because they're operating in different styles and going for different audiences but yeah, NXT isn't going to fail because WWE will make sure it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4655 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12,683
|
Quote:
I've never said TNA should be absolved from its failures
Quote:
and I've never said it never stood a chance.
Yeah just that it was crushed by WWE rather than its own failings. Quote:
What I'm actually saying here is that WWE's current de facto monopoly in the US is bad for wrestling, which it clearly is. And although TNA did screw up, the bigger picture is that WWE's dominance has crushed the demand for a second US promotion, which it has. And with NXT, deliberately and cynically so.
Alternatively of course the never ending series of failures on the part of TNA may have crushed the desire for a second US promotion. Wait, what am I saying. TNA can't possibly be held responsible for anything. It was obviously the fault of the WWE. I wouldn't want to be a WWE apologist right now would I. I will however say that I really enjoy the logic behind a small promotion like NXT that has wrestling fans excited about the product and industry in a way they haven't been in a long time is a cynical move on the part of the WWE to destroy everyone. Just as I'm sure the reports of WWE looking to financially invest in other promotions is a sign of them wanting to crush everyone. Quote:
Watch WWE now crush RoH in exactly the way it did TNA.
Please give legitimate and documented examples of WWE 'crushing' TNA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4656 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
Quote:
wwe doesnt even know tna exists probably lol
sorry seibu you know i stick up for tna when required but i dont see how wwe putting on poor raw week after week is killing tna. wcw tooka dvantage of poor wwe product. why hasnt tna? ill tell you why because they let the best booker in wrestling go. screw tna!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4657 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 966
|
Nah that's okay nobody has to agree with me!
![]() Basically, WWE's "crushing" of TNA is the same as they're now starting to do to RoH. Intimidating venues out of hosting them and making it clear to talent that RoH is no longer a career path to WWE - they should go to NXT. Oh, and watch for "low morale" and "backstage chaos" stories about RoH to start appearing in the dirtsheets in, hmm, about six months. Maybe "crushing" is a little strong And nobody said WWE have to give other promotions an easy ride - they are competitors after all. I agree that WWE have basically managed to "passive aggressive" TNA to death, more or less. And they'll now start doing the same to RoH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4658 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12,683
|
Quote:
this i cannot agree with. tna always presented itself as "wrestling" and very very rarerly did it focus on sports entertainment, the times it did were the best in the companies history for me.
TNA certainly embrace the label of wrestling in a way that WWE absolutely doesn't but that's entirely an issue of labeling or branding rather than a reflection of the product they're actually putting on. There's actually remarkably little difference between the product offered by TNA and WWE which is not a good thing for anyone. As WCW found out the hard way you cannot compete with WWE on their terms and by trying to 'out WWE' them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4659 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17,297
|
Quote:
Lol, would that be the one that has been booking for a large percentage of their history, including when they were supposedly at war with WWE?
when 100% his product it was stopped after 2 months the rest was partial booking watered down with wrasslin. russo would never book 20 min matches on a weekly show best tna time for me would be when he first joined in asylum days or when in impact zone sting fued with abyss for world title and they had backstory with abyss dad. but me personally i found it was rare than was ever a real russo product and considering i am such a big fan i think i would know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4660 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 966
|
Alexi, you really are straw-manning the heck out of me today. I'm impressed!
![]() My position on TNA is the same as it's always been: It's not as bad as people say. The dirtsheets give it an unfairly hard time. It's failure is more to do with the decline of wrestling generally than the quality of its product. I've certainly never said that TNA's product is perfect (I think it's generally about as good / bad as WWE, which is not good enough for an underdog competitor). I do frequently cite their failings, which to me are the decision to give Hogan and Bischoff too much control in 2009 (although that kind of made sense at the time) and trying to turn Aries heel in 2012. I've posted about both of those in the past. I still think that even without those failings they faced an uphill battle against the corporate juggernaut that is WWE. Would they have succeeded without making those mistakes? To me it's probably less than 50/50. Oh yeah there are persistent rumours about WWE asking venues not to host TNA when Impact went on the road. Given the ridiculous venues Impact ended up having to book, I choose to believe them. I also think talent tacitly understood at some points that TNA was not a wise career move if they wanted ultimately to work in WWE. I also think dirtsheet writers have understood in the past that making TNA look bad is likely to get them better inside access with WWE. So sue me. If that makes me some kind of crazy radical to you, so be it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4661 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
Lol, never in TNA's history has it ever booked wrasslin as you call it. It's been the same sort of stuff that Russo, Bischoff etc. always do. Faction wars, wacky stips and people fighting over who gets to control the company. The absolute opposite of wrasslin in the truest sense.
And also a midget wanking into a bin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4662 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17,297
|
Quote:
Lol, never in TNA's history has it ever booked wrasslin as you call it. It's been the same sort of stuff that Russo, Bischoff etc. always do. Faction wars, wacky stips and people fighting over who gets to control the company. The absolute opposite of wrasslin in the truest sense.
And also a midget wanking into a bin. x division is wrestling. this silly destination x cash in is wrestling. you can have stips all you want and crazy chaarcters to boot but its watered down with long matches it is not sports entertainment and is not a russo product. the faction wars were fun mind |
|
|
|
|
|
#4663 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
WWE, TNA, ROH, NJPW, PPW, HOH, Lucha Underground all have or have had in 2015 television shows airing on US national television. The NWA has just signed a deal with AXS to return to national television in September. And I'm sure I'm missing some off that list. Maybe I'm wrong about it being more than it has been but it certainly feels like it considering no U.S. broadcaster is interested in wrestling programming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4664 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
Nah that's okay nobody has to agree with me!
![]() Basically, WWE's "crushing" of TNA is the same as they're now starting to do to RoH. Intimidating venues out of hosting them and making it clear to talent that RoH is no longer a career path to WWE - they should go to NXT. Oh, and watch for "low morale" and "backstage chaos" stories about RoH to start appearing in the dirtsheets in, hmm, about six months. Maybe "crushing" is a little strong And nobody said WWE have to give other promotions an easy ride - they are competitors after all. I agree that WWE have basically managed to "passive aggressive" TNA to death, more or less. And they'll now start doing the same to RoH.So two examples of WWE damaging TNA is by telling arenas to not book them like TNA was going to be filling them anyway and by not giving them the time of day. Again, it's not that TNA failed, it's that by WWE barely mentioning TNA (I can think of no more than two occasions, one of which was out of their control) hindered TNA. God help TNA if McMahon actually went for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4665 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
Imagine watering down a wrestling show with wrestling! And I would like to know when this period when TNA was having loads of extended TV matches.
Faction wars/invasions have been the main storyline in TNA for the majority of their history so even if you love those angles, they get really old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4666 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
A man with all the neck issues he's had over the years IS only one bad bump away from being paralysed. Just because he's managed to avoid it to this point doesn't mean it's a good idea to keep good. I think his performances have declined a lot too. And a lot of these guys pull themselves together for going on screen and actually look a lot worse backstage. I can envision Angle being a wreck off camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4667 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
Oh yeah there are persistent rumours about WWE asking venues not to host TNA when Impact went on the road. Given the ridiculous venues Impact ended up having to book, I choose to believe them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4668 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
I've heard the stories about WWE trying to keep ROH out of venues but I never heard it about Impact. It's not like WWE and TNA would have been booking the same level of venues anyway, so it's not like WWE could have promised exclusive deals like they can with NXT in ROH venues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4669 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
The only story I've ever read about WWE trying to keep TNA from a venue is the rumours that WWE want Orlando as the home of a physical HOF but won't do it unless TNA doesn't tape there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4670 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
I've heard the stories about WWE trying to keep ROH out of venues but I never heard it about Impact. It's not like WWE and TNA would have been booking the same level of venues anyway, so it's not like WWE could have promised exclusive deals like they can with NXT in ROH venues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4671 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
I wish the UK had that sort of deal. WOuld love to see New Japan every week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4672 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17,297
|
Quote:
Imagine watering down a wrestling show with wrestling! And I would like to know when this period when TNA was having loads of extended TV matches.
Faction wars/invasions have been the main storyline in TNA for the majority of their history so even if you love those angles, they get really old. FINALLY no need toa rgue every point for sake of arguing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4673 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
You certainly have a weird way of reading posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4674 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17,297
|
Quote:
You certainly have a weird way of reading posts.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4675 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
Quote:
ok so now you admit that it is a pure wrasslin show
FINALLY no need toa rgue every point for sake of arguing. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42.





