• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: US
TNA Wrestling on Challenge TV (Part 2)
<<
<
187 of 248
>>
>
Hollie_Louise
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by seibu:
“What would internet debate be without constant straw-manning, eh?

I've never said TNA should be absolved from its failures, and I've never said it never stood a chance. It's screwed up loads of times, and it probably did have a chance to grow into something bigger around 2009. A chance which it blew.

What I'm actually saying here is that WWE's current de facto monopoly in the US is bad for wrestling, which it clearly is. And although TNA did screw up, the bigger picture is that WWE's dominance has crushed the demand for a second US promotion, which it has. And with NXT, deliberately and cynically so.

Watch WWE now crush RoH in exactly the way it did TNA. And watch the WWE apologists try and make out that it's somehow a good thing.”

What has WWE done to "crush" TNA? I'm genuinely looking forward to examples of WWE doing any form of damage to TNA's reputation.
whedon247
29-07-2015
wwe doesnt even know tna exists probably lol

sorry seibu you know i stick up for tna when required but i dont see how wwe putting on poor raw week after week is killing tna.

wcw tooka dvantage of poor wwe product. why hasnt tna?

ill tell you why because they let the best booker in wrestling go. screw tna!!!!!!!!!
James Frederick
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“What has WWE done to "crush" TNA? I'm genuinely looking forward to examples of WWE doing any form of damage to TNA's reputation.”

WWE ignored them dispite TNA trying to make out there was a new Wrestling War going on.

They ignored them becuase TNA was no threat.

Only time WWE did anything was a few legal things over copyrighted names which they would have done to anybody.
FMKK
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“you said taker was frail and couldnt move prior to mania. he entered bulky and had a good match with bray wyatt. its that simple”

I think you're making that bit up. But I can hardly be the only one who is ready for WWE to actually go all the way with their new stars rather than wheeling out the likes of Taker because they think that's the only way to draw.

Quote:
“we have heard how 1 bump could hurt angle for 5 years now, yet hes still ok. and his matches are better than alot of wrestlers who are fully fit. as i said though i would like him to work reduced schedule in wwe, he is wasted in TNA”

A man with all the neck issues he's had over the years IS only one bad bump away from being paralysed. Just because he's managed to avoid it to this point doesn't mean it's a good idea to keep good. I think his performances have declined a lot too. And a lot of these guys pull themselves together for going on screen and actually look a lot worse backstage. I can envision Angle being a wreck off camera.

Quote:
“as for nxt, you know i am a big fan, it is more enjoyable than tna by a country mile. but it would not be without wwe. it did not have to go through the challenges tna has. glad we agree on that.”

I think it's hard to even compare the two (TNA and NXT) because they're operating in different styles and going for different audiences but yeah, NXT isn't going to fail because WWE will make sure it doesn't.
AlexiR
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by seibu:
“I've never said TNA should be absolved from its failures”

You just fail to acknowledge them, label anyone that does a 'WWE apologist' (or something similarly themed) and construct arguments where the failings of TNA are the fault of anyone and everyone but TNA.

Quote:
“and I've never said it never stood a chance.”

Yeah just that it was crushed by WWE rather than its own failings.

Quote:
“What I'm actually saying here is that WWE's current de facto monopoly in the US is bad for wrestling, which it clearly is. And although TNA did screw up, the bigger picture is that WWE's dominance has crushed the demand for a second US promotion, which it has. And with NXT, deliberately and cynically so.”

Alternatively of course the never ending series of failures on the part of TNA may have crushed the desire for a second US promotion. Wait, what am I saying. TNA can't possibly be held responsible for anything. It was obviously the fault of the WWE. I wouldn't want to be a WWE apologist right now would I.

I will however say that I really enjoy the logic behind a small promotion like NXT that has wrestling fans excited about the product and industry in a way they haven't been in a long time is a cynical move on the part of the WWE to destroy everyone. Just as I'm sure the reports of WWE looking to financially invest in other promotions is a sign of them wanting to crush everyone.

Quote:
“Watch WWE now crush RoH in exactly the way it did TNA.”

Please give legitimate and documented examples of WWE 'crushing' TNA.
FMKK
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“wwe doesnt even know tna exists probably lol

sorry seibu you know i stick up for tna when required but i dont see how wwe putting on poor raw week after week is killing tna.

wcw tooka dvantage of poor wwe product. why hasnt tna?

ill tell you why because they let the best booker in wrestling go. screw tna!!!!!!!!!”

Lol, would that be the one that has been booking for a large percentage of their history, including when they were supposedly at war with WWE?
seibu
29-07-2015
Nah that's okay nobody has to agree with me!

Basically, WWE's "crushing" of TNA is the same as they're now starting to do to RoH. Intimidating venues out of hosting them and making it clear to talent that RoH is no longer a career path to WWE - they should go to NXT. Oh, and watch for "low morale" and "backstage chaos" stories about RoH to start appearing in the dirtsheets in, hmm, about six months.

Maybe "crushing" is a little strong And nobody said WWE have to give other promotions an easy ride - they are competitors after all. I agree that WWE have basically managed to "passive aggressive" TNA to death, more or less. And they'll now start doing the same to RoH.
AlexiR
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“this i cannot agree with. tna always presented itself as "wrestling" and very very rarerly did it focus on sports entertainment, the times it did were the best in the companies history for me.”

I'm somewhat concerned that you haven't ever watched an episode of Impact...

TNA certainly embrace the label of wrestling in a way that WWE absolutely doesn't but that's entirely an issue of labeling or branding rather than a reflection of the product they're actually putting on. There's actually remarkably little difference between the product offered by TNA and WWE which is not a good thing for anyone. As WCW found out the hard way you cannot compete with WWE on their terms and by trying to 'out WWE' them.
whedon247
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“Lol, would that be the one that has been booking for a large percentage of their history, including when they were supposedly at war with WWE?”

he hardly booked at all imo

when 100% his product it was stopped after 2 months

the rest was partial booking watered down with wrasslin. russo would never book 20 min matches on a weekly show

best tna time for me would be when he first joined in asylum days or when in impact zone sting fued with abyss for world title and they had backstory with abyss dad.

but me personally i found it was rare than was ever a real russo product and considering i am such a big fan i think i would know.
seibu
29-07-2015
Alexi, you really are straw-manning the heck out of me today. I'm impressed!

My position on TNA is the same as it's always been: It's not as bad as people say. The dirtsheets give it an unfairly hard time. It's failure is more to do with the decline of wrestling generally than the quality of its product.

I've certainly never said that TNA's product is perfect (I think it's generally about as good / bad as WWE, which is not good enough for an underdog competitor). I do frequently cite their failings, which to me are the decision to give Hogan and Bischoff too much control in 2009 (although that kind of made sense at the time) and trying to turn Aries heel in 2012. I've posted about both of those in the past. I still think that even without those failings they faced an uphill battle against the corporate juggernaut that is WWE. Would they have succeeded without making those mistakes? To me it's probably less than 50/50.

Oh yeah there are persistent rumours about WWE asking venues not to host TNA when Impact went on the road. Given the ridiculous venues Impact ended up having to book, I choose to believe them. I also think talent tacitly understood at some points that TNA was not a wise career move if they wanted ultimately to work in WWE. I also think dirtsheet writers have understood in the past that making TNA look bad is likely to get them better inside access with WWE. So sue me.

If that makes me some kind of crazy radical to you, so be it.
FMKK
29-07-2015
Lol, never in TNA's history has it ever booked wrasslin as you call it. It's been the same sort of stuff that Russo, Bischoff etc. always do. Faction wars, wacky stips and people fighting over who gets to control the company. The absolute opposite of wrasslin in the truest sense.

And also a midget wanking into a bin.
whedon247
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“Lol, never in TNA's history has it ever booked wrasslin as you call it. It's been the same sort of stuff that Russo, Bischoff etc. always do. Faction wars, wacky stips and people fighting over who gets to control the company. The absolute opposite of wrasslin in the truest sense.

And also a midget wanking into a bin.”

how old were you when tna started? teenager yet?

x division is wrestling. this silly destination x cash in is wrestling.

you can have stips all you want and crazy chaarcters to boot but its watered down with long matches it is not sports entertainment and is not a russo product.

the faction wars were fun mind
dave_windows
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“WWE, TNA, ROH, NJPW, PPW, HOH, Lucha Underground all have or have had in 2015 television shows airing on US national television. The NWA has just signed a deal with AXS to return to national television in September. And I'm sure I'm missing some off that list. Maybe I'm wrong about it being more than it has been but it certainly feels like it considering no U.S. broadcaster is interested in wrestling programming.”

I wish the UK had that sort of deal. WOuld love to see New Japan every week.
Hollie_Louise
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by seibu:
“Nah that's okay nobody has to agree with me!

Basically, WWE's "crushing" of TNA is the same as they're now starting to do to RoH. Intimidating venues out of hosting them and making it clear to talent that RoH is no longer a career path to WWE - they should go to NXT. Oh, and watch for "low morale" and "backstage chaos" stories about RoH to start appearing in the dirtsheets in, hmm, about six months.

Maybe "crushing" is a little strong And nobody said WWE have to give other promotions an easy ride - they are competitors after all. I agree that WWE have basically managed to "passive aggressive" TNA to death, more or less. And they'll now start doing the same to RoH.”

Samoa Joe just signed from ROH so forgive me for not buying this.

So two examples of WWE damaging TNA is by telling arenas to not book them like TNA was going to be filling them anyway and by not giving them the time of day.

Again, it's not that TNA failed, it's that by WWE barely mentioning TNA (I can think of no more than two occasions, one of which was out of their control) hindered TNA. God help TNA if McMahon actually went for them.
FMKK
29-07-2015
Imagine watering down a wrestling show with wrestling! And I would like to know when this period when TNA was having loads of extended TV matches.

Faction wars/invasions have been the main storyline in TNA for the majority of their history so even if you love those angles, they get really old.
dave_windows
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“A man with all the neck issues he's had over the years IS only one bad bump away from being paralysed. Just because he's managed to avoid it to this point doesn't mean it's a good idea to keep good. I think his performances have declined a lot too. And a lot of these guys pull themselves together for going on screen and actually look a lot worse backstage. I can envision Angle being a wreck off camera.”

Sadly I think 5 years from now he probably could be.
Hollie_Louise
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by seibu:
“Oh yeah there are persistent rumours about WWE asking venues not to host TNA when Impact went on the road. Given the ridiculous venues Impact ended up having to book, I choose to believe them.”

So despite deriding/complaining about people who post rumours about TNA, you'll happily use them to further your own point.
FMKK
29-07-2015
I've heard the stories about WWE trying to keep ROH out of venues but I never heard it about Impact. It's not like WWE and TNA would have been booking the same level of venues anyway, so it's not like WWE could have promised exclusive deals like they can with NXT in ROH venues.
Hollie_Louise
29-07-2015
The only story I've ever read about WWE trying to keep TNA from a venue is the rumours that WWE want Orlando as the home of a physical HOF but won't do it unless TNA doesn't tape there.
dave_windows
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“I've heard the stories about WWE trying to keep ROH out of venues but I never heard it about Impact. It's not like WWE and TNA would have been booking the same level of venues anyway, so it's not like WWE could have promised exclusive deals like they can with NXT in ROH venues.”

How does a fan get into ROH? Its one promotion I never found interesting when The Wrestling Channel was around.
Hollie_Louise
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“I wish the UK had that sort of deal. WOuld love to see New Japan every week.”

Have you considered NJPW World, their version of the WWE Network?
whedon247
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“Imagine watering down a wrestling show with wrestling! And I would like to know when this period when TNA was having loads of extended TV matches.

Faction wars/invasions have been the main storyline in TNA for the majority of their history so even if you love those angles, they get really old.”

ok so now you admit that it is a pure wrasslin show

FINALLY

no need toa rgue every point for sake of arguing.
Hollie_Louise
29-07-2015
You certainly have a weird way of reading posts.
whedon247
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“You certainly have a weird way of reading posts.”

thank you so much for your compliment hollie
FMKK
29-07-2015
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“ok so now you admit that it is a pure wrasslin show

FINALLY

no need toa rgue every point for sake of arguing.”

Well no, that's not what I did. And I don't think you know what a pure wrestling show is if you honestly think that TNA is an example of it.
<<
<
187 of 248
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map