Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 

The Daily Pwice


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-03-2013, 15:22
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,134
Don't think that is true because she was quite vocal on the fact she only slept with Dwight to get Dane jealous because he was a Man U fan and also no man likes to think of his ex being f**ked by a black man (her exact words iirc). What a classy reason to bring a child into the world eh?
Well she definitely was pregnant in that video, and heavily pregnant, so it must have been when she was pregnant by Dane
Kay2000 is offline  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-03-2013, 15:31
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,134
from what I remember reading on other sites she was pregnant with Dane's baby at the time of the sex tape and later went on to have an abortion.
To be honest i thought it was Danes baby, but i was told i was wrong, and it was actually Harvey. If that was Danes baby, that is shocking because she was actually showing a bump, before getting rid
Kay2000 is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 15:40
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,134
But people on this very thread have given evidence from medical professionals that state clearly what factors would contribute to his medical condition.

So if you ignore that then you are being ignorant to suit the fact you like KP. So you can believe it but its not 100% fact.
Had Katie not been getting totally trollyed , only then can it be said that it is not a contributing factor
Kay2000 is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 15:50
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
It probably is Betty but I don't believe any doctor would tell her that it was 100% certainly genetic as they couldn't possible know for sure.
Also, the way she conducted herself while pregnant will always mean there is a doubt in peoples minds and I'm sure in hers as well. Maybe by keep repeating that she KNOWS it's genetic, she's trying to convince herself?
^ This. I'm sure she feels a lot of guilt over it. Deep down. For that reason, as awful as she is, I feel sympathy for her because it can't be an easy thing to live with. She can't change the past and to have it thrown in her face by whoever this latest person is, is cruel imo. And anyone who takes pleasure from her discomfort over it is imo equally cruel.
lexi22 is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:17
OneFourThree
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 302
I dont remember any of these attacks taking place when she was expecting Princess and Junior. Harvey is 10 years old and we now have this bra model deciding to get herself in the paper by saying his mother was culpable 10 years ago. One has to ask, why now?
This ^^^^
OneFourThree is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:18
Essex Angel*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,328
Just reading an article in the Guardian about Katie which someone linked to in the Politics Forum. A very tiny mention 10 paragraphs down about Amy Price last year spending 3 months in Goa working with slum children. I can't find anymore details.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012...son-disability
Essex Angel* is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:27
ValentinaVargas
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 345
It probably is Betty but I don't believe any doctor would tell her that it was 100% certainly genetic as they couldn't possible know for sure.
Also, the way she conducted herself while pregnant will always mean there is a doubt in peoples minds and I'm sure in hers as well.
Maybe by keep repeating that she KNOWS it's genetic, she's trying to convince herself?



Harvey Price's disabilities are septo-optic dysplasia, which causes blindness and growth hormone deficiency; Prader-Willi syndrome, a genetic disorder that means he is likely to eat to excess and is prone to obesity and diabetes; as well as ADHD and autism. .

I do believe that he has recently been diagnosed with more disorders.


http://www.pwsa.co.uk/index.php/what-is-pws

The following is taken from The Prader-Willi Syndrome Association website:

Why does PWS happen?
If your baby has just received a new diagnosis of PWS you might be feeling upset and confused. Or, if you have an older child, you might have just got the answer to years of not understanding why they seem a little different from their peers. You may be asking, why has my child got PWS?

It is important to know that a diagnosis of PWS is not your fault. Chromosomes come in pairs, and PWS is simply due to the baby failing to receive active paternal genes from a specific section of one chromosome 15. There are three main ways that this can happen.

• If your child has a ‘deletion’ (about 70% of all cases of PWS) it means that part of the chromosome 15 inherited from the child’s father is missing.

• If your child has ‘maternal uniparental disomy (UPD)’ (about 25% of cases) it means they have taken both copies of chromosome 15 from one parent — the mother.

• If you are told that your child has an ‘imprinting defect’ (less than 5% of cases) it means that the ‘PWS genes’ on the father’s chromosome 15 are present but do not work because the imprinting process is faulty. (Further testing and genetic counselling are especially important for families who have a child with an imprinting defect.)

Neither deletion nor UPD types of PWS are hereditary and neither type is likely to reoccur in the family.



My intention is to show that at least ONE of Harvey's disabilities is genetic.
ValentinaVargas is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:31
gilliedew
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,154
I think the medical reasons which Katie clings to so defiantly is her only way to deny her behaviour when pregnant was acceptable.

However, the one good thing is that Katie obviously adores Harvey( in her own way).
gilliedew is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:31
ValentinaVargas
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 345
I dont remember any of these attacks taking place when she was expecting Princess and Junior. Harvey is 10 years old and we now have this bra model deciding to get herself in the paper by saying his mother was culpable 10 years ago. One has to ask, why now?


My thoughts exactly re Harvey, that and a few other things that are stirring.
ValentinaVargas is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:31
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
In fairness, it's not Harvey being criticised, it's KP. Her behavior is being called into question and she only has herself to blame because she's made sure that the whole world knows about every aspect of her life.
No Harvey isn't being criticised .. But his disabilities are being used to criticise his mother ..
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:38
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
Fizgig
You wrote " what has PA given in he past few months " #589
To which Diamond Doll replied " you will find your answer in a PA thread " #590
I'm not accusing you of anything ..
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:38
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
Harvey Price's disabilities are septo-optic dysplasia, which causes blindness and growth hormone deficiency; Prader-Willi syndrome, a genetic disorder that means he is likely to eat to excess and is prone to obesity and diabetes; as well as ADHD and autism. .

< - snip - >

My intention is to show that at least ONE of Harvey's disabilities is genetic.
? This is the second time someone has chosen to respond to Blondie's very innocuous post with what reads like a lecture about Harvey's condition. Why not target someone - and you'd be spoilt for choice on this thread - who's actually far more vocal about casting doubt on the genetic aspect of his condition, rather than someone who just voiced a very reasonable opinion on KP's response to the criticism?

Can you not see how annoying it might be?
lexi22 is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:51
whatever54
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,097
Just reading an article in the Guardian about Katie which someone linked to in the Politics Forum. A very tiny mention 10 paragraphs down about Amy Price last year spending 3 months in Goa working with slum children. I can't find anymore details.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012...son-disability
that's the most interesting article I've read about Pricey in a long time, thanks
whatever54 is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:56
Cym
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,651
[/b]

My thoughts exactly re Harvey, that and a few other things that are stirring.

you could say mysteriously stirring
Cym is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 16:58
ValentinaVargas
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 345
? This is the second time someone has chosen to respond to Blondie's very innocuous post with a lecture about Harvey's condition. Why not target someone - and you'd be spoilt for choice on this thread - who's actually far more vocal about casting doubt on the genetic aspect of his condition, rather than someone Can you not see how annoying it might be?
"but I don't believe any doctor would tell her that it was 100% certainly genetic as they couldn't possible know for sure."

"Maybe by keep repeating that she KNOWS it's genetic, she's trying to convince herself?"

Did anyone say that I was criticizing Blondie's comment? No, I did not. The above comments are why I selected hers. Hoping that an intelligent exchange about it might occur, also she appeared as someone with an open mind set.

May I remind you that Blondie reacted to someone else's comment, not mine.

It's interesting though that you interpreted my comment as lecturing, whereas you would be spoilt for choice with other comments here in that department.
ValentinaVargas is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:02
johartuk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,468
No Harvey isn't being criticised .. But his disabilities are being used to criticise his mother ..
As far as I can see, the only comments have been about what KP did during her pregnancy with Harvey and how those things could have affected him. No-one is saying that they did affect him. The truth is, we don't know what caused Harvey's disabilities, but as KP has put them in the public domain, people will comment.

KP chooses to live her life in the glare of the public spotlight. You can't do that then moan that people are commenting on your life.
johartuk is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:06
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
Fizgig
You wrote " what has PA given in he past few months " #589
To which Diamond Doll replied " you will find your answer in a PA thread " #590
I'm not accusing you of anything ..
But it was in response to two other posts about PA, which I HAVE ALREADY QUOTED.!
Point of matter - PA was brought up on a thread, and when I replied about him, I was told I should go to the PA thread!!!
TACTICS!
Fizgig is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:07
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
As far as I can see, the only comments have been about what KP did during her pregnancy with Harvey and how those things could have affected him. No-one is saying that they did affect him. The truth is, we don't know what caused Harvey's disabilities, but as KP has put them in the public domain, people will comment.

KP chooses to live her life in the glare of the public spotlight. You can't do that then moan that people are commenting on your life.
Totally agree with you Johartuk .. She has said many times she is open to critacism but to use her child to do so is wrong..
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:07
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
"Maybe by keep repeating that she KNOWS it's genetic, she's trying to convince herself?"

Did anyone say that I was criticizing Blondie's comment? No, I did not. The above comment is why I selected hers. Hoping that an intelligent exchange about it might occur, also she appeared as someone with an open mind set.

May I remind you that Blondie reacted to someone else's comment, not mine.

It's interesting though that you interpreted my comment as lecturing, whereas you would be spoilt for choice with other comments here in that department.
Sorry, that's how it came across to me. Had you just posted without quoting, it would have read differently as you're making a good point.

Blondie's comment was about KP's response to Harvey's condition, not Harvey's actual condition or the causes of it. Two completely separate things.
lexi22 is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:08
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
But it was in response to two other posts about PA, which I HAVE ALREADY QUOTED.!
Point of matter - PA was brought up on a thread, and when I replied about him, I was told I should go to the PA thread!!!
TACTICS!
Tactics?? By DD ..
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:16
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
Why do you fail to see what's pointed out plainly & clearly?

POST 586
I've always thought that KP couldn't care less what anyone says or thinks because as long as she is being noticed she's happy.
As a sidenote that's why I don't much bother commenting on KP (unless birthday brandy was taken ) because I think her only agenda is to gain attention and I find it tedious and not amusing at all...........unlike her ex side-kick who I find hilarious.
POST 587
Agree on both points.
KP would love to be liked but she'd rather be hated than ignored. For her, negative opinion is better than no opinion at all.
On the second point, he amuses me big time. She is a horror but then vile is as vile does and she annoys me rather than tickles me. She is obviously a far more spiteful person but his neediness and good guy act is the gift that keeps on giving for me.
So where's the sense in saying that I BROUGHT PA UP in post 589?
Fizgig is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:16
ValentinaVargas
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 345
Sorry, that's how it came across to me. Had you just posted without quoting, it would have read differently as you're making a good point.

Blondie's comment was about KP, not Harvey's condition. Two completely separate things.


"but I don't believe any doctor would tell her that it was 100% certainly genetic as they couldn't possible know for sure."

This comment above which I added later is also why I selected Blondie's comment.

Because the specialists do know....re the
Prader-Willi syndrome which Harvey has...that this is genetic.
ValentinaVargas is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:20
fifitrixibelle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,645
? This is the second time someone has chosen to respond to Blondie's very innocuous post with what reads like a lecture about Harvey's condition. Why not target someone - and you'd be spoilt for choice on this thread - who's actually far more vocal about casting doubt on the genetic aspect of his condition, rather than someone who just voiced a very reasonable opinion on KP's response to the criticism?

Can you not see how annoying it might be?
TBH I don't see anyone posting any differently to Blondie, it's an opinion, whoever disagrees with it.
The fact is drinking whilst pregnant does not do a foetus any good. It is HER actions that myself and a lot of people find repulsive..... I think the point is pertinent as she continues to play hard and fast with her children, psychologically with the constant and confusing parade of uncles, and if she is jumping horses, taking a ridiculous and totally unnecessary risk no matter who pipes up that 'her' doctor says it's o.k
And this is all done for her own gratification and is not in a million years in these children's best interests, and in that regard she absolutely stinks as a parent, and the worst of it is that she will never learn or change.
I really don't care who finds it unpalatable....I find that behaviour, and racially derogatory comments completely vile and indefensible.
fifitrixibelle is offline  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:22
janna
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ♥~ GUESS~♥
Posts: 3,557
Again Goldbear the word is COULD ..yet some on here insist it is FACT .. I believe his condition is genetic.
Also how do you know if Katie wouldn't cope .. I find it pathetic she is slated or having help.. Thousands of families get support with their disabled children.. Having money is a bonus as Katie can afford the best. And has often said so..also when a family is faced with this situation a lot help them out..that's the right thing to do surely..
Families get rest bite care so they can have family time with their other children whilst someone specifically trained looks after their disabled child ..
Please quote where anyone has stated it as fact.

You say you work with disabled ? Rest bite ?
That would be respite actually.
janna is offline Follow this poster on Twitter  
Old 24-03-2013, 17:25
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
Please quote where anyone has stated it as fact.

You say you work with disabled ? Rest bite ?
That would be respite actually.
Thank you spelling police .. It was predictive text and until you pointed it out I hadn't noticed .. Thank you I will correct it now

Sorry Janna it won't let me correct it .. So you are going to have to deal with it.. And yes until my illness I worked with young adults with severe behavioural problems as well as disabilities .. I will give you the full details I.e. my name ,place of work and ex managers number if you want o confirm this in a PM
Betty Britain is offline  
 
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:03.