Oscars winner who you think didn't deserve their statues |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 10,198
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,713
|
I need to watch that movie again to see that powerhouse of a performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 66
|
This is probably a controversial post but I can't help but wonder if Halle Berry, Octavia Spencer and Monique, were handed their Oscars to make up for the past. Actresses such as Angela Bassett, Whoopi Goldberg who were brilliant in their respective roles in What's Love Got To Do With It and The Colour Purple, missed out. Now it seems as though playing a loud mouth supressed black woman is a shoe in to winning the gold. I agree with a previous post. Octavia Spencer's role in the Help was a character with the same attitude as every other role she has played. Not to say that it wasn't good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,713
|
How the hell The Color Purple didnt win any awards is downright criminal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Services: Madonna/Ri-Ri/Lana
Posts: 9,787
|
Quote:
But yes, i agree 100 per cent with the rest of your post. I would say Viola Davis was much deserving for winning for The Help, much more than a lot of other black female performances. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southwest England
Posts: 642
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
I won't hear a bad word said about George Clooney either
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Services: Madonna/Ri-Ri/Lana
Posts: 9,787
|
I haven't stole any opinions from anyone, thank you very much
The fact that several of my opinions happen to be woman mean nothing by it. Stop having a go at people for simply having a debate about something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,566
|
Quote:
It is a bit disappointing to give an opinion and then get told I show disrespect for giving that opinion. As a fact, erxperts as shown by their membership of the Academy, considered Kate Winslet deserved an Oscar for best actress in a leading role. It is not exactly stupid for me to agree with them,, and it is on the face of it a bit stupid to say that she was not even in a leading role never mind not much cop as an actress. If you say soimething stupid, do not get all huffy when someone says it was stupid. It makes you look pathetic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,566
|
You are right about the film, it was not great, but it had the advantage of being funny which usually means not much in the way of awards. I haven't seen Damage but I will watch out foir it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Services: Stetson's are cool
Posts: 87,938
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,373
|
Quote:
![]() How it works is that the producers of each film decide which category their actors are to be submitted in. The Academy voters have no say in that. I never said you were stupid for agreeing with them, in fact I said 'each to their own', but I do not have to agree that Kate Winslet was a lead actress in the Reader. Plenty of people agree with me as well, as has already been pointed out. There is no right or wrong. And stop putting words in my mouth as well, at no point did I say she 'wasn't much cop' as an actress - she's great in the Reader, but she's better in Revolutionary Road, which is what she should have won it for. That was my original point, which again you seem to have missed entirely. Disagreeing doesn't make me stupid, it means I have a different opinion, one which you clearly don't know how to respect. If you're going to call me stupid again, you'll find yourself reported, as it's clearly against the T&Cs of this forum to belittle others, which is what you're doing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Services: Madonna/Ri-Ri/Lana
Posts: 9,787
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,815
|
I think sometimes the Academy Awards gives awards to actor or actresses that are due rather than the performance itself. This was the case with Al Pacino and 'Scent of a Woman'. I think he has delivered much better performance prior to that with 'Dog Day Afternoon' being a prime example.
An example that is direct to the question is Anthony Hopkins for 'The Silence of the Lambs' where he was in it for about 15 minutes and Sean Penn for 'Milk' when Mickey Rourke should have won for 'The Wrestler.' |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,444
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,815
|
I thought he was very good in it as you could see the physical and emotional pain of a man who has to come to terms with his regrets that he can no longer participate in the thing he is most passionate about as well as the regrets he has for being responsible for the estranged relationship he has with his daughter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Services: Stetson's are cool
Posts: 87,938
|
Personally, I thought Penn was sublime in Milk. I thought Rourke delivered a very intimate, personal and surprising performance in The Wrestler, but I think the oscar went to the right person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,032
|
Yep, absolutely. Of all of the male lead performances from that year(1993), I think it should have been Anthony Hopkins for 'Remains of the Day'. His silent butler performance was amazing. A truly great performance.
Ironically, Hanks won the following year as well(for Forest Gump). I think one of Hanks' best performances was in 'Big'. As a comedy performance that was very good. Comedy is perhaps harder than drama, and sadly it doesn't seem to get that much Oscar recognition(only Diane Keaton for 'Annie Hall' and Frances McDormand for 'Fargo' spring to mind). |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,299
|
Al Pacino- scent of a woman,shouldve gone to Robert Downey Jnr-Chaplin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 19,879
|
Tommy Lee Jones [The Fugitive]. The oscar should have gone to Ralph Fiennes [Schindler's List]
Halle Berry's win was peculiar. The film 'Crash' winning anything. I found it very corny. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oldham
Posts: 1,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 79
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lothlórien
Services: Virgin Media
Posts: 7,565
|
Judi Dench - Shakespeare In Love
Meryl Streep - Kramer vs Kramer (Little Justin Henry - Billy Kramer should have won instead )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,835
|
Tom Hanks - Forrest Gump
For Forrest Gump to win Best Director, Best Actor and Best MOvie (plus another three) in a year which included films like The Shawshank Redemption, Pulp Fiction and The Madness of King George just shows how utterly wrong the Academy can get it IMO It was a terrible movie |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27.




