Forums
 Register • FAQ • Today's Posts • Search • Rules
 

Anne Hathaway - Too successful now, let's knock her down

Reply
1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28-02-2013, 11:48   #1
ClaireyB
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 49
Cutest thing..child models recreate Oscar dresses
Arent they adorable?
http://wp.me/p2EAVa-458
ClaireyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 28-02-2013, 12:15   #2
Saltydog1955
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,913
Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.
Saltydog1955 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 14:07   #3
Walter Neff
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 1,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaireyB View Post
Arent they adorable?
http://wp.me/p2EAVa-458
In a word, NO!

Creepy would be more appropriate.
Walter Neff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 14:22   #4
Smiley433
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Location: Location
Services: Gas, Electricity and Water
Posts: 2,913
And in another word, why?
Smiley433 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 15:32   #5
fizzycat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: south birmingham
Posts: 1,680
Adorable? No, not in the least.

Creepy and just plain wrong. Very, very wrong.
fizzycat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 15:56   #6
diamond1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog1955 View Post
Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.
my thoughts too
diamond1 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 16:09   #7
angelafisher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Birmingham
Services: Freeview BT Infinity
Posts: 2,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog1955 View Post
Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.
I'd agree with that. Why was this even on the news this morning?
angelafisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 16:09   #8
blossom24
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 397
No! wrong on so many levels!
blossom24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 16:38   #9
diamond1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saltydog1955 View Post
Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.
the photographer does minipops type of pics too

http://tricia.bigeyephotography.com/...rentID=1074051

very creepy
diamond1 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 16:42   #10
grimtales1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Albans, UK, Team Wagner
Posts: 35,647
Looks creepy IMO especially the Halle Berry, Jeniffer Lawrence ones, its like looking at dolls
grimtales1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 16:46   #11
vulturepiano
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 61
Disgusting
vulturepiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 22:21   #12
jabegy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Hampshire
Services: a compaq computer, an ipod, a jake gyllenhaal calendar and a bus pass
Posts: 3,982
Sorry, I don't agree, I think children should look like children, they're adorable enough already, they don't need that sort of 'enhancement'.
jabegy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 22:58   #13
NotaTypo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Services: Frequent unscheduled trips to the woodshed.
Posts: 2,670
Have the daily mail picked up on this yet? They've got an almost Savile-like interest in famous little girls.
NotaTypo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 23:09   #14
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 19,053
Something for the paedos.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2013, 23:33   #15
doom&gloom
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Services: Strumpets and glee girls
Posts: 8,370
What a weird reaction.

They found some child lookalikes for Oscar winners, it's just a bit of fun

Has the whole country gone bonkers or just DS?
doom&gloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 01:05   #16
dee123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Neff View Post
In a word, NO!

Creepy would be more appropriate.
Exactly.
dee123 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 02:06   #17
janna
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,360
Good God in heaven ---NO !
That is a paedo's (wet)dream.
Why are they sexualising children ? Idiot parenting (or lack of) there & wrong on every level.
janna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 22:56   #18
tartan18
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Aberdeenshire
Services: Two tin cans and a bit of string
Posts: 2,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by doom&gloom View Post
What a weird reaction.

They found some child lookalikes for Oscar winners, it's just a bit of fun

Has the whole country gone bonkers or just DS?
It's a perfectly normal reaction. This sort of thing is part of the reason the world has gone bonkers
tartan18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 23:31   #19
Walter Neff
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Faversham, Kent
Posts: 1,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by doom&gloom View Post
What a weird reaction.

They found some child lookalikes for Oscar winners, it's just a bit of fun

Has the whole country gone bonkers or just DS?
If you think that it's "just a bit of fun" the you are the one that's bonkers.
Walter Neff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 00:13   #20
doom&gloom
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Services: Strumpets and glee girls
Posts: 8,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Neff View Post
If you think that it's "just a bit of fun" the you are the one that's bonkers.
I don't know what pictures you were looking at but I don't see how you can get "disgusting" and "one for the paedos" from some picture of girls in long dresses, yes they're wearing a lot of make-up but they probably wouldn't look like the celebs they're meant to look at otherwise.

EDIT: Had a look at the photographers website and some of those pictures are a bit dodgy.
doom&gloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 00:19   #21
Horton
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,008
Horrid
Horton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 00:51   #22
Saltydog1955
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,913
This one in particular is spectacularly wrong.

http://www.tricia.bigeyephotography....rentID=1074051
Saltydog1955 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 02:32   #23
janna
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,360
Beyond tacky & into gross. Bet he makes a fortune from people who 'like' those sort of pictures of little children.
Shades of Jon Benet Ramsay.
janna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 02:40   #24
doom&gloom
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Services: Strumpets and glee girls
Posts: 8,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by janna View Post
Beyond tacky & into gross. Bet he makes a fortune from people who 'like' those sort of pictures of little children.
Shades of Jon Benet Ramsay.
Tricia sounds like a woman to me and I'm betting it's middle-aged women who like this sort of cutesy rubbish.
doom&gloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 03:38   #25
janna
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,360
It isn't cute though. Clomping round in mum's high heels wearing one of her frilly tops as an ill fitting dress,and with lipstick on your eyelids & blue eyeshadow on your cheeks is cute. All kids do it. Full professional make-up ,wigs,hairstyling,false lashes & dresses made especially to copy the adult version caters to only one market in my opinion.Most disturbing.
janna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
1 of 2 1 2 >


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21.

Digital Spy - Privacy Statement - Top