I initially suggested Discuss as a name... the only other name that we had was Chatter, which we were told we weren't allowed to use. I wrote the pitch using Discuss as a working title, and while I was writing it, I realised that it actually completely summed up what our show was about. It wasn't a cheesy name, it did what it said on the tin. Maybe it wasn't such a good name in hindsight, but we had no other suggestions, and I think we all thought it was pretty good after a while. It wasn't just me, after I had written the pitch the team mates said that they thought the name sounded good as well.

They are well known and well respected presenters and I believe they could have worked well together. By the way Lord Stuart, did me posting in the other thread count against us because I genuinely didn't know the rule?

I suggested Ellie and Evan as a Name and Evan and Ellie in the Morning

I don't see why they are a strange choice. They are both respected, intelligent individuals, they are known for presenting shows about current affairs, and they have a friendly and pleasant manner about them. They're not known for presenting together - but then, no presenting duo are until they do their first show. I don't understand what is wrong with having Ellie and Evan.

Oh good thank you.

Emma's name was entirely reliant on having Ellie and Evan as presenters, and I thought that if we weren't able to get them for whatever reason, the name wouldn't work.


I didn't look through Twitter myself, I don't know who did that. Our market research was not done effectively, I'll concede that point.

I believe the presenters would have worked well together as they are professional and good at what they do.

Okay. I suggested Ellie and Evan, I thought they were commonly respected and would work well together; maybe I was wrong. But the whole team agreed.

Well i suggested using a well known presenting pair like Holly and Phil Caroline and Olly ect

I think that without a shadow of a doubt, Jordan should be fired. He was supposed to be our team manager, and he contributed nothing at all to the task.

I believe Jordan deserves to be fired as he hasn't turned up at all and didn't contribute anything.

Jordan should be fired as he hasnt turned up

I agreed with Caroline and Olly.

Eliza, you never seemed to make a decision or contribute an idea by yourself for this task, you need to be more bold on the next task. You were a bit like a nodding dog.

Well done Emma

Thank you Lord Stuart
P,,S can we have a House thread for both teams?

I'd just like to point out that the reason I disagreed is because many of the people watching will be older, and I didn't think that we should go down the route of having all young presenters.

I don't think I should be fired as despite this task, I am creative. I know I may have got some things wrong on this one, but on the last task, our PM took on board many of our ideas - I suggested the meat pie, for example - and we won that task. I think I was a key player in that. I think under the circumstances, I did a good job standing in for Jordan. Everyone has said I was great, I never had an argument with anyone, we all worked together fantastically and we came up with something that I believed in. I concede that it had some flaws, but I'm not perfect. But I am by no means the weakest member of the team.