|
||||||||
BBC New 5 minutes ago...the average Android device costs less than $150. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 906
|
BBC New 5 minutes ago...the average Android device costs less than $150.
Just watching BBC new and they are saying world wide over 80% of Andriod devices in use right now cost less than $150. That's quite shocking.
The average Apple device costs over $450 and the average windows phone in use right now cost over $350, so it seems android really is the primark of mobile tech. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
Just watching BBC new and they are saying world wide over 80% of Andriod devices in use right now cost less than $150. That's quite shocking.
The average Apple device costs over $450 and the average windows phone in use right now cost over $350, so it seems android really is the primark of mobile tech. Even a moron can see this is showing you you are getting ripped right off from apple since those 80% are still better than the iPhone!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Wales/Gran Canaria
Posts: 8,298
|
Apple only produce a couple of phones at fixed prices, Android is open platform and can go on many devices, so its not exactly shocking news now is it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,617
|
What would they fetch on Ebay though??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,058
|
Any idea who the BBC source of that information is? What type of average is being applied?
Which bit is the BBC quote and which is your added information? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,070
|
Is it not thought that the iphone costs about that to make as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ignoringtrollsville
Posts: 7,875
|
Quote:
What would they fetch on Ebay though??
I can only speak for myself but I would very probably get my money back on what I paid for my Huawei G300 ![]() PS yet more proof that the mobile 'war' will develop on the exact same lines as the Mac v PC 'war'...with the same result. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
|
Quote:
Is it not thought that the iphone costs about that to make as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
Just watching BBC new and they are saying world wide over 80% of Andriod devices in use right now cost less than $150. That's quite shocking.
The average Apple device costs over $450 and the average windows phone in use right now cost over $350, so it seems android really is the primark of mobile tech. So Android (a mobile OS not a make of phones) is “Primark”. So what does that make Apple (a Make of phones not a mobile OS). So who on the high street, apart from Apple, sell items available elsewhere at normal prices, let’s say smartphones for $150 for instance, hmmm. Yes Apple are the BrightHouse of the mobile world. You pay more and get less. I’m off to Primark for some socks – well socks are mobile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,524
|
This is because there are half a billion generic android handset in china that are not google play certified built on mediatek chipsets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
Just watching BBC new and they are saying world wide over 80% of Andriod devices in use right now cost less than $150. That's quite shocking.
The average Apple device costs over $450 and the average windows phone in use right now cost over $350, so it seems android really is the primark of mobile tech. I prefer to think of it the other way round - apple as being the Burberry of the tech world. Overpriced for what you are getting and more than a little chavvy ![]() ..... Perspective is a wonderful thing.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Its funny tracey..errr...i mean hugh never came back to this thread. Just shows sheer trolling.
Also I never saw this on BBC news at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,221
|
Quote:
This is because there are half a billion generic android handset in china that are not google play certified built on mediatek chipsets.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 16,705
|
My Ace 2 was about £150 when I bought it last October and is due a JB update soon. So I'm getting my moneys worth from it. I refuse to now upgrade to anything else as the Ace 2 does all I need and is the perfect size for me.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
Price has no reflection on quality. Sometimes when you pay more you get more, sometimes you don't. I don't really see what the point is, as some Android phones cost quite a lot, as much as an iPhone, and others are very cheap. The key is though that Android covers a wide spectrum and allows its users a choice in what kind of device they use and what they want to get out of it. That is the key to its success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 15,938
|
That's not such a bad thing. Not everyone is going to want or be able to afford a £500 phone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14,219
|
It could well be true. However I agree cheap doesn't always mean crap. Before I got my Samsung galaxy note, I bought a galaxy y for about £100 and used it for 2 months after my iPhone was stolen. I didn't think it would be very good, but surprisingly it was really good. Once you took out things like build quality and screen quality, in terms of function I'd say it could do about 80 percent of the things that top end phones can do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,151
|
Just buy a nexus 4 and laugh at all the iPhone 5 fanboys ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Homerton, London, E9
Posts: 1,742
|
I disagree that Android is the Primark of phones. First of all Android is a fantastic mobile operating system. It is software. Android is not hardware. It's open source and can be loaded onto any device a manufacturer wants it to be on. It's not Android's fault if it gets loaded onto a garbage hardware phone. iOS would also be awful if it was somehow flashed onto a £50 device. Fed up of this ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,151
|
Quote:
Fed up of this ignorance.
) , having had 2 HTC's and then a Nexus 4 with an iphone5 ( for 3 weeks ) inbetween , the worst mistake i have ever made was getting the iphone5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
$150 is a lot.
I very much doubt there is any smart-phone out there that costs more than that to manufacturer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Here in body, not in mind
Posts: 7,056
|
Being relatively new to Android (How I miss Windows mobile pocket PCs
![]() ![]() ![]() ) I can't really say much apart from the fact they do a good entry level one like the Alcatel TT-903 Onetouch (I coldn't get the one I wanted).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 30,072
|
Oh some ignorant flaming trolls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
|
Quote:
How is it shocking?
Even a moron can see this is showing you you are getting ripped right off from apple since those 80% are still better than the iPhone! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
|
Why bump a thread from March to reply to a poster, surely if it wasn't worth doing at the time then it isn't now
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50.






