Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 
 

Andre's "suffering"


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2013, 21:22
The Prumeister
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 16,513
So she had a bit of a wild night then..where as this is a normal night out for KP.


But not exactly classy.
The Prumeister is offline  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 04-05-2013, 21:29
KayteJ
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 127
But not exactly classy.
Even classy birds need to let their hair down occasionally..

But that's the difference between classy and trashy.

KP is trashy, plenty evidence to back that up...Elen Rivas? she has the odd wild night out. Classy
KayteJ is offline  
Old 04-05-2013, 21:34
The Prumeister
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 16,513
Even classy birds need to let their hair down occasionally..

But that's the difference between classy and trashy.

KP is trashy, plenty evidence to back that up...Elen Rivas? she has the odd wild night out. Classy



But your original statement was 'never seen her drunk, knickerless or swearing' - which was incorrect.
The Prumeister is offline  
Old 04-05-2013, 21:35
artlesschaos
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,105
Even classy birds need to let their hair down occasionally..

But that's the difference between classy and trashy.

KP is trashy, plenty evidence to back that up...Elen Rivas? she has the odd wild night out. Classy
He knew who and what Kp was before he had got her pregnant and he bought into every aspect of it, including the "split personality" nonsense. He had children with her and married her. He was far from a vestal virgin, and had spoken many times of his 1,000's of conquests, so he was no innocent.

His choices are not her fault. As far as I can see, he and Kp was the meeting of two perfectly media-whoring narcissists. Shame they parted, really.
artlesschaos is offline  
Old 04-05-2013, 21:47
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
He knew who and what Kp was before he had got her pregnant and he bought into every aspect of it, including the "split personality" nonsense. He had children with her and married her. He was far from a vestal virgin, and had spoken many times of his 1,000's of conquests, so he was no innocent.

His choices are not her fault. As far as I can see, he and Kp was the meeting of two perfectly media-whoring narcissists. Shame they parted, really.
Good post
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 04-05-2013, 22:05
KayteJ
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 127
He knew who and what Kp was before he had got her pregnant and he bought into every aspect of it, including the "split personality" nonsense. He had children with her and married her. He was far from a vestal virgin, and had spoken many times of his 1,000's of conquests, so he was no innocent.

His choices are not her fault. As far as I can see, he and Kp was the meeting of two perfectly media-whoring narcissists. Shame they parted, really.
Not denying that. I was merely pointing out that he doesn't always go for the KP type, as has been mentioned.
KayteJ is offline  
Old 04-05-2013, 23:35
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
PA created her split personality gimmick, when he said he didn't like Jordan & all she stood for, but he loved the Katie Price he got to know in the jungle. They then sold this idea that KP did have a nice sweet side, and that Jordan was business only. Turned out they are one and the same.
Fizgig is offline  
Old 04-05-2013, 23:39
artlesschaos
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,105
PA created her split personality gimmick, when he said he didn't like Jordan & all she stood for, but he loved the Katie Price he got to know in the jungle. They then sold this idea that KP did have a nice sweet side, and that Jordan was business only. Turned out they are one and the same.
I think CP created that gimmick. Kp & Pa just went along with it.
artlesschaos is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 00:14
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
Unless it has changed very recently, no, they are not. Children in "reality" shows are not covered by the same restrictions and protections as child models and performers.
Technically most local authorities tend to disagree with you but the rules are very out-dated (in fact the government are changing them to specifically incorporate reality shows). The way the local authorities see it is if isnt "news" content then yes the kids do need licensing and the regulations should be followed regardless. It is all the subject of one big argument at the moment - even though its a grey area, most TV companies are tending to license them.

In BGT all the kid acts are licensed and subject to the restrictions. I would expect this carries across to all ITV programming including PA's.
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 00:18
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
Do the kids get paid for being in Peters show?
They could be, but they don't have to be. It wouldnt suprise me if they are claiming an appearance fee for them.

IF the regulations are being followed (as has been said, its a grey area for reality tv) they dont need a chaperone (as he is a parent with them) but their working hours would still need to be cleared ahead of time with the local authority, proper breaks given etc etc.
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 00:20
annw
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,560
Wasn t it Katie who created Katie and Jordon. She has said as much herself.
annw is online now  
Old 05-05-2013, 00:24
artlesschaos
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,105
Technically most local authorities tend to disagree with you but the rules are very out-dated (in fact the government are changing them to specifically incorporate reality shows). The way the local authorities see it is if isnt "news" content then yes the kids do need licensing and the regulations should be followed regardless. It is all the subject of one big argument at the moment - even though its a grey area, most TV companies are tending to license them.

In BGT all the kid acts are licensed and subject to the restrictions. I would expect this carries across to all ITV programming including PA's.
But you don't know, and there is not yet a legal requirement for them.
artlesschaos is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 00:27
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
If I was Peter ..i would ask them to pay the kids for being in the show ..so it can be put away for when they are older.. Didn't Katie and Peter do that when they got paid for photo shoots?
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 08:24
SenseiSam
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,147
If I was Peter ..i would ask them to pay the kids for being in the show ..so it can be put away for when they are older.. Didn't Katie and Peter do that when they got paid for photo shoots?
Hasn't it been discussed before? I vaguely remember something about Katie being paid appearance fees for Harvey before permission was withdrawn but agree Betty I trust all the kids are being paid - they earn it.

I think the kids are what kept the marriage together for as long as it did because they both valued their family life. But if Katie hadn't been pregnant I wonder whether he would have married her so quickly, if at all. He clearly fancied her and loved certain qualities like her humour and directness but I think he came to dislike her rudeness, negativity and selfishness. No doubt there's plenty of things about him that she came to dislike too.

Yes they both made a lot of money out of their relationship but there's more to life. I think it's significant that now he's heading towards marriage with Emily he's moving away from reality shows.

But it's all water under the bridge and old news, the best they can do now is become more amicable for the sake of the children.
SenseiSam is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 09:50
Nicola32
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,253
I think it's ridiculous to compare his relationship with Emily to the relationship he had with KP. Emily has a totally different character to KP for one thing and I don't believe that she would be comfortable with being sexually overt on camera.
Also, as Sensaisam pointed out in an earlier post Pete is aware that Emily's family watch the programme.

KP was/is perfectly happy being sexually overt on camera, she has made a living from it.

Most men IMO will act accordingly depending on the type of woman they are with. If a woman behaves like a lady most men will treat her like one.
Nicola32 is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 11:28
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
Nicola there were times when Katie looked embarressed when Peter was simulating sex acts on her..I remember once they were with Peters family and Katie said "stop it pete your parents are out there" he just laughted at her ..
I hope Peter has learnt from their marriage as both have said having the cameras there put too much strain on their marriage ..
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 11:29
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
SemseiSam
Im not sure if it's been discussed before .. But I do hope their children are paid ..they will have a nice little nest egg for when they are older

Can I ask you a question..who withdrew permission for Harvey?
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 11:50
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
Nicola there were times when Katie looked embarressed when Peter was simulating sex acts on her..I remember once they were with Peters family and Katie said "stop it pete your parents are out there" he just laughted at her ..
I hope Peter has learnt from their marriage as both have said having the cameras there put too much strain on their marriage ..
There's no way KP was ever embarrassed about someone dry humping her, come on! This is the same woman who shows her tit calendars to her kids saying "Who's that?"
The same woman who tells everyone she does anal vodka & did her latest with a strap-on, which made her c** really quick.
Fizgig is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 11:56
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
There's no way KP was ever embarrassed about someone dry humping her, come on! This is the same woman who shows her tit calendars to her kids saying "Who's that?"
The same woman who tells everyone she does anal vodka & did her latest with a strap-on, which made her c** really quick.

Watch it again...she was
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 11:57
The Prumeister
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 16,513
I think it's ridiculous to compare his relationship with Emily to the relationship he had with KP. Emily has a totally different character to KP for one thing and I don't believe that she would be comfortable with being sexually overt on camera.
Also, as Sensaisam pointed out in an earlier post Pete is aware that Emily's family watch the programme.

KP was/is perfectly happy being sexually overt on camera, she has made a living from it.

Most men IMO will act accordingly depending on the type of woman they are with. If a woman behaves like a lady most men will treat her like one.

So a man's behaviour is totally dependent on a woman and they have no sentient thoughts of their own
The Prumeister is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 12:02
artlesschaos
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,105
So a man's behaviour is totally dependent on a woman and they have no sentient thoughts of their own
Wow, who knew women had that much power?
artlesschaos is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 12:06
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
Watch it again...she was
Watch what? How about a link, or the episode number?
Fizgig is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 12:07
Azura's Star
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,495
So a man's behaviour is totally dependent on a woman and they have no sentient thoughts of their own

Well MOST men do.
However, if they are poor wittle Petey-wetey, you must remember he is an innocent, naive and sensitive young thing, who somehow fell under the hypnotic, mind-controlling spell of she-who-must-not-be-named, and NOTHING is ever his fault.
Azura's Star is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 12:07
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
Wow, who knew women had that much power?
I did
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 05-05-2013, 12:09
Nicola32
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,253
So a man's behaviour is totally dependent on a woman and they have no sentient thoughts of their own

Did I actually say that???

What part of if a woman is a lady a man will treat her like one do you find hard to understand?
Nicola32 is offline  
 
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:07.