Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 

Andre's "suffering"


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2013, 21:29
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
Pity this new found concern for the children's well being, wasn't considered at their birth
Hasn't she explained this enough. They felt as babies they didn't know the difference about being filmed or not. Her point was that she regrets it now (as she said on Titchmarch), she implied a lot of it was down to pressure from management, and said she realises now because the kid is at an age where it has started to affect him.

It's obvious it has affected him from the TV show.

I don't think he ignored her request because of anything she's done, its about his image.
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 08-05-2013, 21:31
artlesschaos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,364
Well she hasn't had her kids in her shows or in mags for over 3 years so I don't know why she would now ...
But she still uses them...
I did not say she was worse Betty, please keep up! I said they were as bad as each other.
Quite.
artlesschaos is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:34
Blondie X
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 19,733
I personally think, KP only made a song and dance about the kids been on tv, in order to make Pete look like the bad guy.

If she really wanted them out of the public eye, i'm sure she could take legal action to ensure this.

For what it's worth, i don't agree with them being on tv either. They should have a choice in the matter and as children, that choice won't have been given.
Yes to all points. It was an empty gesture that she could have enforced if she really meant it. Look at how easy its been for Jeff Brazier to keep the media away from his kids
Blondie X is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:38
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,127
Hasn't she explained this enough. They felt as babies they didn't know the difference about being filmed or not. Her point was that she regrets it now (as she said on Titchmarch), she implied a lot of it was down to pressure from management, and said she realises now because the kid is at an age where it has started to affect him.

It's obvious it has affected him from the TV show.

I don't think he ignored her request because of anything she's done, its about his image.
All of a sudden these concerns surfaced, pull the other one Cyril. How as it affected him, he shows off, as do all children with a camera on them, Your point was * if she asked Pete to remove them, then he bloody well should* out of respect for her But it's okay for Princess to be pictured with a face full of make up, to thousands of strangers, you either want them to remain private or not!
Kay2000 is online now  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:41
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
All of a sudden these concerns surfaced, pull the other one Cyril. How as it affected him, he shows off, as do all children with a camera on them, Your point was * if she asked Pete to remove them, then he bloody well should* out of respect for her But it's okay for Princess to be pictured with a face full of make up, to thousands of strangers, you either want them to remain private or not!
That princess photo first got out from SOPHIES facebook account, which I gather was private.

Him showing off is the whole point. Her point was he was showing off too when the camera was off him and it was affecting him at school.
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:44
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,127
That princess photo first got out from SOPHIES facebook account, which I gather was private.

Him showing off is the whole point. Her point was he was showing off too when the camera was off him and it was affecting him at school.
Do you have kids? You stick a camera in front of any child,and they will show off, its the law.
Kay2000 is online now  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:44
fifitrixibelle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,638
Hasn't she explained this enough. They felt as babies they didn't know the difference about being filmed or not. Her point was that she regrets it now (as she said on Titchmarch), she implied a lot of it was down to pressure from management, and said she realises now because the kid is at an age where it has started to affect him.

It's obvious it has affected him from the TV show.

I don't think he ignored her request because of anything she's done, its about his image.
Oh lordy.....so she's all contrite and full of regrets (b*llocks) now she's made thousands out of them...she still uses them when it suits, she had realised she came across as a wooded self absorbed, lazy effort of a mother. The kid's were outshining her,
She likes to apportion a blame (story of her life) to someone else for Junior's perceived problems and yet neither she nor her fans see the slightest problem of how these kids are sitting front row and central to her pathetic games of randomers and weddings, papped shots and twitters/articles of the latest shag who lurves her kids and are the best eveeeeeer with Harvey. No she's not f*cking with their head's is she,being the MOTHER OF HER CHILDREN an all
fifitrixibelle is online now  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:46
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
Do you have kids? You stick a camera in front of any child,and they will show off, its the law.
Again, her point was, he's getting upto stuff AWAY from the cameras because of the attention.
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:47
SenseiSam
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,625
No thats not what i'm saying at all Sam.

But to give him a series he has to tell ITV whats going to be in that series and who, and obviously they need stories and content to keep it interesting. If he has a girlfriend or an interesting storyline in his brother i'm sure they wouldnt have said no to the offer of using them.

I don't think he will move away from "My Life", he'll just do other stuff.
I think there is a difference between Emily being introduced as his new girlfriend and as a 'replacement' for Katie. I agree the editing brings out the contrast between them but I don't believe it's a false representation of her and I don't think they could fake the children's obvious affection for her.

Pete has said in interviews that he is progressively moving into new formats and doing less reality with 60 MM being the start. http://tv.uk.msn.com/news/andre-shyi...y-from-reality
SenseiSam is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:49
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,127
Again, her point was, he's getting upto stuff AWAY from the cameras because of the attention.
So that will just cover the filming attention, not the pictures posted of the new step daddy on Facebook or Twitter, because no children Junior's age could possibly be on either of those
Kay2000 is online now  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:49
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
She likes to apportion a blame (story of her life) to someone else for Junior's perceived problems and yet neither she nor her fans see the slightest problem of how these kids are sitting front row and central to her pathetic games of randomers and weddings, papped shots and twitters/articles of the latest shag who lurves her kids and are the best eveeeeeer with Harvey. No she's not f*cking with their head's is she,being the MOTHER OF HER CHILDREN an all
But isnt the same thing going on in families up and down the country nowadays? Fair point.

But i think the question of them being characters in a reality show with a million viewers is a bit of a different situation.
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:54
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,127
But isnt the same thing going on in families up and down the country nowadays? Fair point.

But i think the question of them being characters in a reality show with a million viewers is a bit of a different situation.
Their private lives are still played out to total strangers, whether that be through filming or pictures to thousands of total strangers. Both parents as bad as each other. Time for bed
Kay2000 is online now  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:56
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
Their private lives are still played out to total strangers, whether that be through filming or pictures to thousands of total strangers. Both parents as bad as each other. Time for bed
Night
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:57
cazzz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,648
Their private lives are still played out to total strangers, whether that be through filming or pictures to thousands of total strangers. Both parents as bad as each other. Time for bed
I'm exhausted after catching up with the thread, so many posts but this last one is spot on,
cazzz is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 21:57
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,127
Goodnight Cyril
Kay2000 is online now  
Old 08-05-2013, 22:02
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
Again, her point was, he's getting upto stuff AWAY from the cameras because of the attention.
And Pete said he'd been into school and talked to the teachers about this and they said there were no problems with Junior.
Fizgig is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 22:11
momma11
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,446
And Pete said he'd been into school and talked to the teachers about this and they said there were no problems with Junior.
Beat me to it , I was just going to post this.

It all boils down to who we choose to believe , I feel the kids should be withdrawn from the public gaze , but I have serious doubts as to KP's motives . IMO it was to stick it to Pete and nothing else
momma11 is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 22:17
Jimmy Connors
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 78,740
Beat me to it , I was just going to post this.

It all boils down to who we choose to believe , I feel the kids should be withdrawn from the public gaze , but I have serious doubts as to KP's motives . IMO it was to stick it to Pete and nothing else
I agree with this entirely. The timing of her 'request' gave away her true motives (IMO)
Jimmy Connors is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 22:19
artlesschaos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 9,364
Beat me to it , I was just going to post this.

It all boils down to who we choose to believe , I feel the kids should be withdrawn from the public gaze , but I have serious doubts as to KP's motives . IMO it was to stick it to Pete and nothing else
Yep. They both use the kids, him for "filler" and for the myth of DOTY, her to try and gain points.

Bless em.
artlesschaos is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 22:22
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
Beat me to it , I was just going to post this.

It all boils down to who we choose to believe , I feel the kids should be withdrawn from the public gaze , but I have serious doubts as to KP's motives . IMO it was to stick it to Pete and nothing else
I agree. I don't have a problem with it but since he's getting stick for it, I hope he moves on from the RTV show to the other stuff like 60MM. Shame the ones that don't like it have to spoil it for the ones who do.
Fizgig is offline  
Old 08-05-2013, 23:30
NotaTypo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,293
I think there is a difference between Emily being introduced as his new girlfriend and as a 'replacement' for Katie. I agree the editing brings out the contrast between them but I don't believe it's a false representation of her and I don't think they could fake the children's obvious affection for her.

Pete has said in interviews that he is progressively moving into new formats and doing less reality with 60 MM being the start. http://tv.uk.msn.com/news/andre-shyi...y-from-reality
More delusion from PA! That's up there with Wembley and hosting his own C4 chat show. He'll end up back with the rest of the dregs on ITV2 with CAN producing because he's had several opportunities at hosting and presenting but they've been unsuccessful. Even the likes of Here to Help and Bad Boyfriend Club had short life spans.
NotaTypo is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 00:34
Cyril_Sneer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,942
And Pete said he'd been into school and talked to the teachers about this and they said there were no problems with Junior.
But what teacher is going to tell a famous celeb what he doesnt want to hear when he goes in asking if his reality show is affecting his kid?

Or are we saying that because she's Katie Price she doesn't know her own kid?

It just doesnt matter though, if the mother asks for them off, they should be off - no matter who she is or what shes done, or even if she has other motives - he was all for shared parental rights, he can't just go ignoring what she wants when it suits him. This kind of thing is too important not to have both parents in agreement about whether they are in the media or not.

This for me has been the single biggest thing i'm dissapointed in him for because IMO it shows up his nice caring dad image for what it is - total fraud - and i'm sure he knows it. But same as a lot of other celebs, when it comes to the crunch he's stuck because he's addicted to the fame and having the TV show.
Cyril_Sneer is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 01:07
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
Cyril
Do you think he will stop doing RT after this series?
Betty Britain is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 06:24
Kay2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,127
But what teacher is going to tell a famous celeb what he doesnt want to hear when he goes in asking if his reality show is affecting his kid?

Or are we saying that because she's Katie Price she doesn't know her own kid?

It just doesnt matter though, if the mother asks for them off, they should be off - no matter who she is or what shes done, or even if she has other motives - he was all for shared parental rights, he can't just go ignoring what she wants when it suits him. This kind of thing is too important not to have both parents in agreement about whether they are in the media or not.

This for me has been the single biggest thing i'm dissapointed in him for because IMO it shows up his nice caring dad image for what it is - total fraud - and i'm sure he knows it. But same as a lot of other celebs, when it comes to the crunch he's stuck because he's addicted to the fame and having the TV show.
Are you really saying that as equal parents of a child, the Father must comply with what ever the Mother insists on, even if she fails to comply herself Wonder if Pete ever asked for his children not to be introduced to random strangers, within days of the Mother meeting them How very sexist Cyril. Good morning by the way
Kay2000 is online now  
Old 09-05-2013, 08:09
Cym
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,651
But what teacher is going to tell a famous celeb what he doesnt want to hear when he goes in asking if his reality show is affecting his kid?

Or are we saying that because she's Katie Price she doesn't know her own kid?

It just doesnt matter though, if the mother asks for them off, they should be off - no matter who she is or what shes done, or even if she has other motives - he was all for shared parental rights, he can't just go ignoring what she wants when it suits him. This kind of thing is too important not to have both parents in agreement about whether they are in the media or not.

This for me has been the single biggest thing i'm dissapointed in him for because IMO it shows up his nice caring dad image for what it is - total fraud - and i'm sure he knows it. But same as a lot of other celebs, when it comes to the crunch he's stuck because he's addicted to the fame and having the TV show.
100% this ^ despite his claims of going for full custody he has always been more than happy to share equally with his ex...due to all the headlines that brings him ...at the cost of his own kids, no real dad would have to be asked to protect their kids from the media
Cym is offline  
 
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:14.