A number of unconstructive posts have been removed from this thread. Please alert any posts that resort to personal attacks rather than engage as this will derail the thread completely. Please try and stay on-topic. Thanks.
LBC 97.3 Politics Thread
114 of 127
See Nick Ferrari quoted the old adage on his show this morning that " Not all muslims are terrorists ,but all terrorists appear to be muslim."
Hello Steve. As the mods have removed a whole page of posts quite a lot of the innocent ones went in the cull including the 2 posts where I asked you the same question twice.
There was a post trying to justify loads of people celebrating Thatcher's death because they had said beforehand that they'd celebrate her death years before she died. I replied that is certainly not an excuse for their behaviour.
You asked me "What about the poster who is using this terrorist attack to make a political point about Corbyn? Is their inexcusable?"
I said both were inexcusable and asked you if you thought both were inexcusable ?
Twice I asked and twice you have ignored the question.
So I ask for a third time :-
Do you think both are inexcusable ?
There was a post trying to justify loads of people celebrating Thatcher's death because they had said beforehand that they'd celebrate her death years before she died. I replied that is certainly not an excuse for their behaviour.
You asked me "What about the poster who is using this terrorist attack to make a political point about Corbyn? Is their inexcusable?"
I said both were inexcusable and asked you if you thought both were inexcusable ?
Twice I asked and twice you have ignored the question.
So I ask for a third time :-
Do you think both are inexcusable ?
Originally Posted by Independence:
“Hello Steve. As the mods have removed a whole page of posts quite a lot of the innocent ones went in the cull including the 2 posts where I asked you the same question twice.
There was a post trying to justify loads of people celebrating Thatcher's death because they had said beforehand that they'd celebrate her death years before she died. I replied that is certainly not an excuse for their behaviour.
You asked me "What about the poster who is using this terrorist attack to make a political point about Corbyn? Is their inexcusable?"
I said both were inexcusable and asked you if you thought both were inexcusable ?
Twice I asked and twice you have ignored the question.
So I ask for a third time :-
Do you think both are inexcusable ?”
“Hello Steve. As the mods have removed a whole page of posts quite a lot of the innocent ones went in the cull including the 2 posts where I asked you the same question twice.
There was a post trying to justify loads of people celebrating Thatcher's death because they had said beforehand that they'd celebrate her death years before she died. I replied that is certainly not an excuse for their behaviour.
You asked me "What about the poster who is using this terrorist attack to make a political point about Corbyn? Is their inexcusable?"
I said both were inexcusable and asked you if you thought both were inexcusable ?
Twice I asked and twice you have ignored the question.
So I ask for a third time :-
Do you think both are inexcusable ?”
I already did. Yes.
Originally Posted by Steve_Allen:
“I already did. Yes.”
“I already did. Yes.”
Sorry Steve but you "already did." NOT (say it was inexcusable). You ignored my question twice.
So just to be clear :-
Do you now think it inexcusable to justify loads of people celebrating Thatcher's death because they had said beforehand that they'd celebrate her death years before she died ?.
Originally Posted by Independence:
“Sorry Steve but you "already did." NOT (say it was inexcusable). You ignored my question twice.
So just to be clear :-
Do you now think it inexcusable to justify loads of people celebrating Thatcher's death because they had said beforehand that they'd celebrate her death years before she died ?.”
“Sorry Steve but you "already did." NOT (say it was inexcusable). You ignored my question twice.
So just to be clear :-
Do you now think it inexcusable to justify loads of people celebrating Thatcher's death because they had said beforehand that they'd celebrate her death years before she died ?.”
Maybe it's not wise to return to a topic responsible for exchanges which somebody flagged up and which were removed. Two participants are now on the naughty step. Perhaps you should drop it. But please yourself.
Originally Posted by gurney-slade:
“Maybe it's not wise to return to a topic responsible for exchanges which somebody flagged up and which were removed. Two participants are now on the naughty step. Perhaps you should drop it. But please yourself.”
“Maybe it's not wise to return to a topic responsible for exchanges which somebody flagged up and which were removed. Two participants are now on the naughty step. Perhaps you should drop it. But please yourself.”
Especially when the other poster has already answered! I was wondering which part of 'yes' wasn't clear?
Originally Posted by gurney-slade:
“Maybe it's not wise to return to a topic responsible for exchanges which somebody flagged up and which were removed. Two participants are now on the naughty step. Perhaps you should drop it. But please yourself.”
“Maybe it's not wise to return to a topic responsible for exchanges which somebody flagged up and which were removed. Two participants are now on the naughty step. Perhaps you should drop it. But please yourself.”
Sorry Gurney but this was not the topic responsible for exchanges which somebody flagged up and which were removed. That was another topic.
Originally Posted by makeba72:
“Especially when the other poster has already answered! I was wondering which part of 'yes' wasn't clear?”
“Especially when the other poster has already answered! I was wondering which part of 'yes' wasn't clear?
”
makeba72, I had answered his question so I reasonably asked him to answer my question on 2 occasions which he refused to do.
When asked a third time he claimed he had answered the question already when he clearly had not. This is the bit that "wasn't clear" so my last question to him was very specific for clarification of his position which he has still not answered.
I hope that this makes it clear.
Originally Posted by Independence:
“makeba72, I had answered his question so I reasonably asked him to answer my question on 2 occasions which he refused to do.
When asked a third time he claimed he had answered the question already when he clearly had not. This is the bit that "wasn't clear" so my last question to him was very specific for clarification of his position which he has still not answered.
I hope that this makes it clear.”
“makeba72, I had answered his question so I reasonably asked him to answer my question on 2 occasions which he refused to do.
When asked a third time he claimed he had answered the question already when he clearly had not. This is the bit that "wasn't clear" so my last question to him was very specific for clarification of his position which he has still not answered.
I hope that this makes it clear.”
Maybe his answer was also removed?
Originally Posted by connor the judg:
“Maybe his answer was also removed?”
“Maybe his answer was also removed?”
No his answer was not removed. I read all of the posts that were removed when they were still on there and he did not answer as indeed he has not answered my clarification question.
Originally Posted by Independence:
“No his answer was not removed. I read all of the posts that were removed when they were still on there and he did not answer as indeed he has not answered my clarification question.”
“No his answer was not removed. I read all of the posts that were removed when they were still on there and he did not answer as indeed he has not answered my clarification question.”
He may have posted after you looked...
Anyway, I think he has given you a clear answer. Maybe we should just leave it now.
Originally Posted by connor the judg:
“He may have posted after you looked...
Anyway, I think he has given you a clear answer. Maybe we should just leave it now.”
“He may have posted after you looked...
Anyway, I think he has given you a clear answer. Maybe we should just leave it now.”
I was online throughout and looking out for his answer. HE DID NOT LEAVE ANY ANSWER.
He has been evasive and not given a clear answer but I agree with you and maybe we should just leave it now. It is clear he does not want to answer and give us clarification.
Are you one of the mods by the way ?.
The reason why I didn't reply to your last post until now was because I have only just read it! What part of yes wasn't clear? I have given you that answer twice now! No matter how many times you ask, the answer will be the same!
This is an LBC link to the row betwwen Mann and Livingstone. Not able to watch it just yet myself. http://l-bc.co/BXIvTo I will make up my own mind later. Interested in your thoughts , however.
Heard John McDonnell on LBC this morning. I think he's better than Corbyn at doing interviews TBH!
I think Corbyn comes across well but, John McDonnell comes across better!
I think Corbyn comes across well but, John McDonnell comes across better!
Originally Posted by chinchin:
“This is an LBC link to the row betwwen Mann and Livingstone. Not able to watch it just yet myself. http://l-bc.co/BXIvTo I will make up my own mind later. Interested in your thoughts , however.”
“This is an LBC link to the row betwwen Mann and Livingstone. Not able to watch it just yet myself. http://l-bc.co/BXIvTo I will make up my own mind later. Interested in your thoughts , however.”
Are you talking about the exchange between the two in that particular video or the original exchange which caused Ken to make his comments in the first place?
If it's the latter, I personally think he has been a victim of the sort of political correctness his party have been preaching in the first place which perhaps he even championed over the decades. It's back fired on him badly like it did on a previous occaision in about 2006.
Corbyn continues to ricochet from one crisis/terrible decision to the next.
Car crash politics!
I'm loving it.
Car crash politics!
I'm loving it.
Originally Posted by connor the judg:
“The hysteria around Jeremy Corbyn is unbelievable! I haven't seen/heard anything like it!”
“The hysteria around Jeremy Corbyn is unbelievable! I haven't seen/heard anything like it!”
Even more fun than Milliband's 'Edstone'.
Originally Posted by gurney-slade:
“Even more fun than Milliband's 'Edstone'.”
“Even more fun than Milliband's 'Edstone'.
”
I thought the press's attacks on Milliband were bad and were very nasty but, there nothing compared to the treatment of Jeremy.
114 of 127
