DS Forums

 
 

I'm confused (which doesn't take much!)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-04-2013, 14:52
Galadriel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 322

In 'Cold War' when Clara said that the world didn't end in 1983 or she would be there, the Doctor replied, "History's in flux. It can be changed... re-written."

In 'Hide', when the psychic said that he [the Doctor] can change history, he said, "No, no I can't actually. There are fixed points in time, you see."

So... can history be changed/re-written or not? Or is it that history CAN be changed/re-written, but not by the Doctor?
Galadriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-04-2013, 15:00
SpringheelJack
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sauf Lan'den
Posts: 1,240
In 'Cold War' when Clara said that the world didn't end in 1983 or she would be there, the Doctor replied, "History's in flux. It can be changed... re-written."

In 'Hide', when the psychic said that he [the Doctor] can change history, he said, "No, no I can't actually. There are fixed points in time, you see."

So... can history be changed/re-written or not? Or is it that history CAN be changed/re-written, but not by the Doctor?
This is all explained in The Fires On Pompeii.

There are certain moments in history that must always happen - events in The Waters of Mars, The Fires Of Pompeii, The Wedding Of River Song are examples where key moments MUST occur.

Everything else is in flux and since the Timelords died, the rest of time is more vunerable.
SpringheelJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 15:03
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
In 'Cold War' when Clara said that the world didn't end in 1983 or she would be there, the Doctor replied, "History's in flux. It can be changed... re-written."

In 'Hide', when the psychic said that he [the Doctor] can change history, he said, "No, no I can't actually. There are fixed points in time, you see."

So... can history be changed/re-written or not? Or is it that history CAN be changed/re-written, but not by the Doctor?
That scene really reminded me of when Sarah Jane said virtually the same thing to the fourth Doctor in the Pyramids of Mars, and he takes her to see an alternate version of 1980 if Sutekh wasn't destroyed.
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 15:09
Galadriel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 322
There are certain moments in history that must always happen - events in The Waters of Mars, The Fires Of Pompeii, The Wedding Of River Song are examples where key moments MUST occur.
But who, or what, decides what are key moments, and therefore must occur, and what aren't?
Galadriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 15:15
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
But who, or what, decides what are key moments, and therefore must occur, and what aren't?
The Doctor, being a Time Lord just sort of knows, I think, but if you think about it too much then it really doesn't make sense and whether something is a fixed point or not just depends on what suits the plot for that episode
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 15:16
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,733
But who, or what, decides what are key moments, and therefore must occur, and what aren't?
The Doct- uh, the writer.

But seriously, the best example I've heard comes from The Empty Child. It was alright to save the child and allow everyone to live as none of those people would have had a major impact on the future. But The Doctor had to ensure the explosion goes off, because it was written about and documented in the future... a fixed point that determined the future. The object of the explosion was also what led the Doctor there in the first place, thus securing the proper future.

There are of course holes in the concept, but it's the one thing that you have to permit any time-travel TV show if you want it to remain interesting.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 15:38
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
But who, or what, decides what are key moments, and therefore must occur, and what aren't?
It's a bit like being an experienced rock climber, or an experienced jungle guide. You have an intuitive sense for what rocks aren't safe to stand on, which vines are actually snakes, where the quicksand is. Of course, his biology as a Time Lord probably helps with that too.

Or, to think of it another way, it's like fish that have a sense for electrical fields, or bats that can navigate in the dark using echoes. The Doctor has an extra 'sense' for time.

Of course, what always gets me is that, if, say, in Cold War, the Doctor hadn't arrived, the sub crew would have still freed and angered Skaldak, and the world would have blown up. So either it's already pre-determined that the Doctor has arrived and fixed the problem, or the Doctor is actually fighting to not screw up what's already in the timeline.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 15:43
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
It's a bit like being an experienced rock climber, or an experienced jungle guide. You have an intuitive sense for what rocks aren't safe to stand on, which vines are actually snakes, where the quicksand is. Of course, his biology as a Time Lord probably helps with that too.

Or, to think of it another way, it's like fish that have a sense for electrical fields, or bats that can navigate in the dark using echoes. The Doctor has an extra 'sense' for time.

Of course, what always gets me is that, if, say, in Cold War, the Doctor hadn't arrived, the sub crew would have still freed and angered Skaldak, and the world would have blown up. So either it's already pre-determined that the Doctor has arrived and fixed the problem, or the Doctor is actually fighting to not screw up what's already in the timeline.
Doesn't it slightly contradict the theory of parallel universes as well though? Where it's perfectly fine to have a version of time where the Doctor doesn't turn up and the world does end in 1983 but that just exists as a parallel universe. Or have I got completely confused? I knew this would happen if I started thinking about it too much!
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 16:09
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
Doesn't it slightly contradict the theory of parallel universes as well though? Where it's perfectly fine to have a version of time where the Doctor doesn't turn up and the world does end in 1983 but that just exists as a parallel universe. Or have I got completely confused? I knew this would happen if I started thinking about it too much!
Absolutely, but then Who's been pretty inconsistent about that too. I think Who's always avoided the many-worlds interpretation, because it makes it infinitely complicated to keep track of which reality we're actually in, or what changes have happened in what timeline. But then again, we've had parallel realities in Inferno, or Rise of the Cybermen, although they've been treated as completely separate and not just one of infinitely many branches. Turn Left is a bit different in that it was one reality created for a specific purpose.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 16:17
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
Absolutely, but then Who's been pretty inconsistent about that too. I think Who's always avoided the many-worlds interpretation, because it makes it infinitely complicated to keep track of which reality we're actually in, or what changes have happened in what timeline. But then again, we've had parallel realities in Inferno, or Rise of the Cybermen, although they've been treated as completely separate and not just one of infinitely many branches. Turn Left is a bit different in that it was one reality created for a specific purpose.
Hmm, and I guess the desolate 1980 that the Fourth Doctor showed Sarah Jane in the Pyramids of Mars was a parallel universe as well?
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 16:39
TheSilentFez
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 10,236
Depends on the story.
There's the idea of "fixed events" and "events in flux", but this is really just a plot device. Doctor Who is a television show which is designed to entertain. It isn't real and it doesn't make any sense in reality.
TheSilentFez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 16:54
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
Hmm, and I guess the desolate 1980 that the Fourth Doctor showed Sarah Jane in the Pyramids of Mars was a parallel universe as well?
Sadly, I've not seen that one yet. Shocking, I know. I shall make amends.

Edit: having consulting the Oracle of Wikipedia, it sounds like that the Doctor moved forward in the main timeline to 1980, to a changed future that they must avert, rather than an alternate timeline.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 17:37
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
Sadly, I've not seen that one yet. Shocking, I know. I shall make amends.

Edit: having consulting the Oracle of Wikipedia, it sounds like that the Doctor moved forward in the main timeline to 1980, to a changed future that they must avert, rather than an alternate timeline.
It is indeed quite shocking! I can't recommend Pyramids of Mars enough. Tom Baker plays the role of the Fourth Doctor quite dark, under orders from the director and much to the protests of Tom
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 19:02
kyllerbuzcut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,740
I'll have a bash.
You could maybe think of it like this:
It's a bit like a copy - paste job.
Using the Pyramids of Mars as an example, The whole series of events occurred with the Doctor and Sarah Jane there.
But they weren't there until they were there. If you get me. They were pasted in from outside that series of events.
If you think now from the point of view of people in 1981 and beyond, the world didn't end (obviously). What happened was- Some god was re-awoken and tried to destroy everything, but the Doctor arrived and sorted it all out.
Until the Doctor arrived and sorted it all out, he wasn't there to sort it all out, therefore until he DID arrive, the course of the events followed to the destroyed earth of 1980.
While still in the process of sorting it all out ( the 'copy' had been pressed but the 'paste' hadn't been done yet) that was still what happened. (the earth was destroyed). He had to complete the 'paste' before the destroyed earth of 1980 had been 'cut', or 'pasted over' from the timeline.

I think in Cold War the Doctor must have known that events couldn't really lead to the nukes being set off, causing a 'hot war'. (Although there would be a very real danger of all that happened was the nukes malfunctioned and exploded, killing some marine life up at the arctic circle. The next day in the news the Russians might deny one of their subs was missing. Meanwhile in other news an unimportant earthquake was registered somewhere near the north pole.)
So there was still plenty of danger, although I'm betting he doesn't think the earth is going to be nuked from all angles. I bet he would STILL tell Clara and everyone else on board that the big danger was the whole earth being nuked as a result of this. The Ice warrior especially, as he already thought he had nothing to lose and might just kill everyone with his bare hands anyway. Him thinking he could work something out to take the world with him buys them all time while he sorts that out. The crew -so they would fight harder to stop the ice warrior and not give up hope that they were dead anyway. Clara -because the last time he let slip something of this nature to a companion, Rose nearly got both of them killed by time eating paradox things, when she saved her dad's life. (there's probably loads more examples, but this is the first that springs to mind). He wants Clara to be VERY careful with time and what she is doing in it. He probably also doesn't quite trust her yet ( he does take her to the haunted house next, with the alterior motive of having the psychic scan her).

So anyway- I think I confused myself somewhere there lol. Maybe we just aren't meant to know some of the answers to the riddles of the universe
kyllerbuzcut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 19:10
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
So anyway- I think I confused myself somewhere there lol. Maybe we just aren't meant to know some of the answers to the riddles of the universe
I like trying to make sense out of things that make no sense

It makes a change from discussing when series 8 will be broadcast or how rubbish the latest episode is because RTD didn't make it
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 19:31
kyllerbuzcut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,740
It sure does

A lot of things like this are still debated by physicists. Stuff that was not thought possible 150 years ago are now believed to be true, like wormholes and obtaining energy from atoms. Some we have actually achieved, some still just theories.
Who knows- maybe Some things in Doctor Who may turn out to be right
kyllerbuzcut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 22:41
Sue_Aitch
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,815
Depends on the story.
There's the idea of "fixed events" and "events in flux", but this is really just a plot device. Doctor Who is a television show which is designed to entertain. It isn't real and it doesn't make any sense in reality.
Quite, similarly Rory both "never existed" and appeared on a photo in 2010 in "The Pandorica Opens." Big Paradox. Not to worry!
Sue_Aitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 23:08
thorr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,999
This is how the dr knows....

"It's like when you're a kid. The first time they tell you that the world's turning and you just can't quite believe it 'cause everything looks like it's standin' still. I can feel it. The turn of the Earth. The ground beneath our feet is spinnin' at 1,000 miles an hour and the entire planet is hurtling around the sun at 67,000 miles an hour, and I can feel it. We're fallin' through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go... That's who I am."
thorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2013, 23:14
Corwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,601
This is how the dr knows....
Also.

DONNA
But if it's aliens setting off the volcano, doesn't that make it all right? For you to stop it?

THE DOCTOR
Still part of history.

DONNA
Well, I'm history too. You saved me in 2008. You saved us all. Why is that different?

THE DOCTOR
Some things are fixed, some things are in flux. Pompeii is fixed.

DONNA

How do you know which is which?

THE DOCTOR
(stops)
Because that's how I see the universe. Every waking second, I can see what is, what was... what could be, what must not. That's the burden of the Time Lord, Donna. I'm the only one left.
Corwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2013, 01:35
Tom Tit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,454
This is all explained in The Fires On Pompeii.

There are certain moments in history that must always happen - events in The Waters of Mars, The Fires Of Pompeii, The Wedding Of River Song are examples where key moments MUST occur.

Everything else is in flux and since the Timelords died, the rest of time is more vunerable.

Sorry, I have to make one small correction here:

'Explained'.

:P

Or...

'explained away'
Tom Tit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2013, 02:25
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
Quite, similarly Rory both "never existed" and appeared on a photo in 2010 in "The Pandorica Opens." Big Paradox. Not to worry!
Not a big paradox, a tiny paradox. An insignificant detail that isn't big enough to bother the Universe. A microscopic speck of sand in the flow of time, a shadow of a memory of an event that never happened. One of those inexplicable things around us every day that we never stop to think about.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2013, 06:52
kyllerbuzcut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,740
Like De Ja Vu

Or ( this kind of thing happens to me ALL the time) you are walking sown a corridor you have many times. You spot a door and think 'That's never been there before'. You ask if they've recently put a new door in and everyone says it's always been there.
kyllerbuzcut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2013, 09:40
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
Like De Ja Vu

Or ( this kind of thing happens to me ALL the time) you are walking sown a corridor you have many times. You spot a door and think 'That's never been there before'. You ask if they've recently put a new door in and everyone says it's always been there.
Whatever you do, DON'T go in there. And if you do, don't look at anything in the corner of your eye.

We've all got pictures that happen to feature faces that we weren't aware of at the time and have had no impact on our lives. They might as well be non-existent.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2013, 20:57
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
Sadly, I've not seen that one yet. Shocking, I know. I shall make amends.

Edit: having consulting the Oracle of Wikipedia, it sounds like that the Doctor moved forward in the main timeline to 1980, to a changed future that they must avert, rather than an alternate timeline.
All this talk of Pyramids of Mars inspired me to watch it again...

After the Doctor takes Sarah Jane to a desolate wasteland in 1980, she says "but it can't be. I'm from 1980" the Doctor's reply is "every point in time has it's alternative Sarah, you've just looked into alternative time" So from that it certainly sounds like the Doctor travelled to a parallel universe. The only time that the TARDIS has easily done that I think. Of course we only have the Doctors word for it that it really was Earth in 1980. I forgot about rule number 1
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2013, 23:54
Sue_Aitch
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,815
Not a big paradox, a tiny paradox. An insignificant detail that isn't big enough to bother the Universe. A microscopic speck of sand in the flow of time, a shadow of a memory of an event that never happened. One of those inexplicable things around us every day that we never stop to think about.

Well maybe a teensy bit bigger a paradox seeing it's Amy's and Rory's daughter who's looking at the photo (which in my head is one Mels took!)
Sue_Aitch is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:58.