Originally Posted by CherylFan:
“If I were to feed the vcr output into the dvd via the 3 phono sockets (rather than scart) is it possible that that might work? The tape in question is a 1997 broadcast of a Wagner opera taped from Brazilian TV which as I`m a collector does have some value. And is unlikely to be replaceable on any other format (eg dvd)!”
I'm sitting here reading this thread and shaking my head in wonder. How long will it take before someone sees the light and goes "
Hey, maybe we should just spend what it costs to get it done right"?
1) The value of the tape is inestimable. It's a rare recording and unlikely to appear on DVD or Blu-ray. Is 40 quid really too much to spend???
2) The domestic gear outputting PAL60 works for viewing on a TV works because the TV is engineered to accept a non-standard signal: Pal and 60Hz are not natural bed fellows. That flexibility doesn't apply to a recorder. They need a stable sync signal and for the signal to conform to specific standards.
The only exception when it comes to VCRs doing standards conversion are the World Standard multi-format VCRs that were available from the early '90s. They digitised the signal and then re-encoded in a new frame rate and colour standard. They weren't without issues of their own though. Frame dropping was common. 60 frames a second doesn't go in to a 50 frames a second system without something giving.
All of the above is by-the-by though. The cost of buying the right gear even second-hand is
way way more than the 40 quid quote for standards conversion. Pursuing the other solution of trying to make a recording from PAL60 is going to work out just as- or more- expensive as a pro conversion and with poorer results. How long is it going to take someone bashing their head against a brick wall to realise this?
I'm all for saving a few quid. But there comes a point where common sense must prevail.