Originally Posted by Thomas_OConnell:
“Honestly, and I think this has been backed up by other housemates I would say myself. After the series, I watched a good portion and was surprised at how little I was shown. Out of interest, did anyone here question why so many housemates thought I would win?”
Yes. Every year whenever HMs have a consensus in the house and in their eviction interviews who they want to win it results in two responses. Confusion at it not being who each individual is closest to and the wondering what exactly we arn't seeing about this HM.
Faye said in her BOTS interview that she'd been told that we weren't seeing much of you but you sing and dance a lot which we
did see just not to a great degree. To be honest this might have worked in your favour. HMs of that type tend to grate on viewers, even Mark was grating on some viewers and by all accounts we weren't shown much of his antics either. Mass amounts of airtime is a poisoned chalice. I can only think of Aaron in the whole history of the show who had the most airtime and did "well".
Quote:
“Alex was never shown to have a conversation; which I put down to easy storytelling.”
She was shown having conversations often. Generaly about trivial things. Easy storytelling definitely but again I think worked in her favour.
Quote:
“I think Jay was protected over the shit. Alas, it would have resulted in his removal, which I didn't feel was necessary.”
You've stated that you felt that Conor from the following series was recieving a similar edit to Jay but with his negative bits included. Could you ellaborate on this?