Oh a\nd answer to the question, Hutton, couldn't string a sentence together, only won because everone was so vile, in the worst series ever.
Dullest ever winner?
4 of 4
Originally Posted by seansnotmyname@:
“really, Kate? Jade and Alex were quite big names, and all the finalists would have polled more than the likes of bb7 or 6. Johnny received over 2.5 million voted too. Did you actually watch BB3? You certainly couldn't have been on forums if you think the likes of samanda adam and deana had anything like the following of alex sibley, or even spencer smith.
10 million people watched the final show, think the oppo blows away any other Bb, or even most other reality TV shows. 9 and ten in particular.”
“really, Kate? Jade and Alex were quite big names, and all the finalists would have polled more than the likes of bb7 or 6. Johnny received over 2.5 million voted too. Did you actually watch BB3? You certainly couldn't have been on forums if you think the likes of samanda adam and deana had anything like the following of alex sibley, or even spencer smith.
10 million people watched the final show, think the oppo blows away any other Bb, or even most other reality TV shows. 9 and ten in particular.”
I have to point out BB7's final had a similar amount votes as compared to BB3's. However, you're right that Kate didn't have an easy victory. BB3 and BB7 were two finals where the public's favourites made it all the way, plus Jennie.
Originally Posted by ABCZYX:
“If she was a radar dodger, then why did she speak out to the HMs she felt were in the wrong, which would make her a sitting target for noms, and why did she make decisions which she knew wouldn't be popular? For example, when she chose Hell's cake, she knew that this would be an unpopular decision, but she stood by it and the following week, she was up for eviction
If people forgot she was there to nominate, then how come she received a total of 22 nominations during her whole time in the house and up until Aaron, was the most nominated winner we've had?”
“If she was a radar dodger, then why did she speak out to the HMs she felt were in the wrong, which would make her a sitting target for noms, and why did she make decisions which she knew wouldn't be popular? For example, when she chose Hell's cake, she knew that this would be an unpopular decision, but she stood by it and the following week, she was up for eviction
If people forgot she was there to nominate, then how come she received a total of 22 nominations during her whole time in the house and up until Aaron, was the most nominated winner we've had?”
Being a radar dodger doesn't mean you get no noms, just never enough to be up for eviction, so you never do anything too controversial.
The too bland to remb to nom was a joke. I'm not saying she was wallpaper, I've a long list of those in "dullest HMs ever" before I'd get to her. But there's a reason why people complain that the *big* characters go first and those that were sort of dull make it pretty far, and Rachel falls in this catergory for me. She'd actually be on my top 4 list of "least annoying winner".
4 of 4
