DS Forums

 
 

Any of these cheap plasmas any good?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30-05-2013, 00:00
hardylane
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,945
No, of course not - HD Ready LCD's are absolutely stunning on HD, HD Ready Plasma sets are rubbish on HD - for 'hardylane' the absolute worst ones I've seen have been old Pioneer ones, there's a fair few media box Pioneers around.
Should've gone to Specsavers.

Mine is superb.
hardylane is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 30-05-2013, 11:37
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
Considering Pioneers are still the reference TV of today, HD ready included, is why what you say should be taken with a pinch of salt.
What a ludicrous statement

So a 480 resolution Pioneer Plasma is the reference today for 1080P BluRay - they didn't even do PAL resolution, never mind HD.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 11:38
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
Should've gone to Specsavers.
I have, have you?


Mine is superb.
And what have you compared it with? - and can you tell instantly if you're watching HD or not (without OSD or DOGS).
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 13:11
webbie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Devon
Posts: 1,568
I'm sure Deacon1972 is referring to the hd ready pioneers (4280, 5080 etc). Which are still brilliant displays.
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/Pioneer-PD...Conclusion.php
webbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 13:49
Deacon1972
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,103
What a ludicrous statement

So a 480 resolution Pioneer Plasma is the reference today for 1080P BluRay - they didn't even do PAL resolution, never mind HD.
Come on Nigel, you know we are discussing HD ready plasma so why mention SD resolution.....

Pioneer's HD ready plasma's were market leaders in pq, manufacturers today strive to equal what Pioneer achieved.

The latest batch of HD ready plasma's may have subjective pq, but that's not to say every HD ready plasma is rubbish/crap at displaying HD, that simply is not true.
Deacon1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 14:16
Glawster2002
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,402
Considering Pioneers are still the reference TV of today, HD ready included, is why what you say should be taken with a pinch of salt.
My 50" Pioneer Kuro is three years old now and I've not seen anything around today in terms of picture quality to match it,
Glawster2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 15:48
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
The latest batch of HD ready plasma's may have subjective pq, but that's not to say every HD ready plasma is rubbish/crap at displaying HD, that simply is not true.
I've yet to see one that isn't - including all the Pioneers I've seen.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 17:19
hardylane
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,945
I have, have you?



And what have you compared it with? - and can you tell instantly if you're watching HD or not (without OSD or DOGS).

I've compared it with my friend's 2012 65" Panasonic plasma.

Of course I can tell HD from SD.

I'm a technician.

Please don't patronise me.
hardylane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 17:20
hardylane
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,945
I've yet to see one that isn't - including all the Pioneers I've seen.
In your opinion. Which, at the end of the day, is all it really is. Not a fact. Just your opinion.
hardylane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 19:37
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
I've compared it with my friend's 2012 65" Panasonic plasma.
Which is presumably a Full HD set and a Plasma, did you take your set round there, or his set to your house?.

Presumably neither, so not much of a comparison if they aren't side by side.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 19:44
hardylane
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,945
Which is presumably a Full HD set and a Plasma, did you take your set round there, or his set to your house?.

Presumably neither, so not much of a comparison if they aren't side by side.
You really won't stop flogging a dead horse will you Nigel? This is why I rarely post on here... Mr 34,000 postings and his unimpeachable sarcastic expertise.

I refuse to justify my personal experience to someone who so clearly has none, and I refuse to lock horns with your smug intransigence yet again.
hardylane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 20:19
Deacon1972
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,103
I've yet to see one that isn't - including all the Pioneers I've seen.
Which is presumably a Full HD set and a Plasma, did you take your set round there, or his set to your house?.

Presumably neither, so not much of a comparison if they aren't side by side.
The same could be asked of you regarding all the Pioneers you have seen - I trust you did a full side by side comparison for each one you've seen.

You work in the industry so you will know, or should know the reputation pioneer had, in fact still hold, even professionals still use them as they still have the best 2D PQ. Got to say you are the only one I know that has the opinion Pioneers are rubbish/crap.

I think it's plain to see where your where your loyalty lies.
Deacon1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2013, 22:38
d'@ve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Darn Sarf
Posts: 28,727
The cheapest crappiest supermarket HD Ready LCD are stunning on HD, so why aren't HD Ready Plasma's?.
You seem to have a strange idea of picture quality. Very strange.
d'@ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 09:07
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
It's funny how all the Plasma fans (presumably in a desperate attempt to try and keep the technology alive?) refuse to entertain my continual advice to actually compare them side by side in a shop.

If Plasma's are supposedly so 'wonderful' why would you refuse to agree that it's a good idea to do your own comparison?.

As always, try them side by side on both SD and HD, and THEN make your own decision.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 09:31
roddydogs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,347
Do Panny still make HD ready (ie not Full HD) sets then?
roddydogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 12:35
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
Do Panny still make HD ready (ie not Full HD) sets then?
Yes they do - or at least they still did recently.

However, I've just checked on the Panasonic website and it seems not to bother mentioning the panel resolutions?.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 12:41
anap
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sunny Bristol
Posts: 3,743
Do Panny still make HD ready (ie not Full HD) sets then?
http://www.johnlewis.com/panasonic-v...iew-hd/p425223
anap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 12:43
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
Nice link - but I'd be more impressed if they didn't wrongly call it a 720P set
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 12:52
Deacon1972
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,103

As always, try them side by side on both SD and HD, and THEN make your own decision.
I did extensive comparisons, I hope most would, the problem is you continually telling everyone that bought plasma they have made a poor decision.

Yes they do - or at least they still did recently.

However, I've just checked on the Panasonic website and it seems not to bother mentioning the panel resolutions?.
It does if you go to the "specifications page"

GENERAL

Suppliers Trademark Panasonic

Model ID TX-P50X60B

Energy Efficiency Class B

Visible ScreenSize (diagonal) 127 cm/50 inches

On mode Average Power Consumption*** 132 W

Annual Energy Consumption**** 183 kWh/year

Standby Power Consumption 0.40 W

Off mode Power Consumption 0.30 W

Screen Resolution 1,024 (W) x 768 (H)

Rated Power Consumption 240 W

Power Supply AC 220- 240V, 50/60 Hz

Dimensions (W x H x D) (w/o stand) 1,184 x 716 x 81 mm (General depth: 63 mm)

Dimensions (W x H x D) (with stand) 1,184 x 757 x 266 mm

Weight (w/o stand) 20.5 kg

Weight (with stand) 21.5 kg

Swivel Angle —

Wall Bracket TY-WK4P1RW

VESA Compatible —

http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_G...trackInfo=true
Deacon1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 14:27
d'@ve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Darn Sarf
Posts: 28,727
It's funny how all the Plasma fans (presumably in a desperate attempt to try and keep the technology alive?) refuse to entertain my continual advice to actually compare them side by side in a shop.

If Plasma's are supposedly so 'wonderful' why would you refuse to agree that it's a good idea to do your own comparison?.

As always, try them side by side on both SD and HD, and THEN make your own decision.
I have an HD ready plasma and a full HD LCD in the same room. Yes, an actual living room - not a brightly lit (or any other kind of) shop.

The LCD is sharper and has more spatial detail on true HD material but it definitely doesn't have a better picture from a normal viewing position (not "nose to the screen"). Spatial resolution and sharpness isn't everything, in fact, it's not even half. If I needed a new set, I'd take one of those cheap Panasonic HD Ready plasmas in preference to any similarly priced LCD set... but my plasma is still going strong after 5 years.
d'@ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 14:46
webbie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Devon
Posts: 1,568
Plasmas do look dim in a shop but that's because of the ridiculous bright lighting.
Put one in a house and they are completely different. You can't compare lcds and plasmas in a shop so that's probably where your going wrong Nigel.
webbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2013, 16:53
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
Plasmas do look dim in a shop but that's because of the ridiculous bright lighting.
Put one in a house and they are completely different. You can't compare lcds and plasmas in a shop so that's probably where your going wrong Nigel.
Except I'm not comparing the lower brightness levels, and not exclusively in shops either.

I have an HD Ready Plasma at home (my main TV, which I'm VERY happy with) and (like others I've tried) it's not really worth bothering with HD on it - I watch Sky+ in preference to my Freeview HD box via it.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 07:56
roddydogs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,347
Not HD ready, its got Freeview HD, so cant be called HD ready.
roddydogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 08:53
Deacon1972
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,103
Not HD ready, its got Freeview HD, so cant be called HD ready.
Thought that was just one of the conditions for the HD ready label in the states, not the UK?
Deacon1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 10:00
mac2708
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,196
HD Ready explained?.........
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/whats-d...ready-full-hd/
mac2708 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:04.