• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
Jack is great!
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
hornbeam
29-05-2013
I enjoyed waching him. He has a natural talent like Peter Kay.

I hope he goes far.
Ambassador
29-05-2013
I thought he was alright but if he didn't have the personality that accompanied his disability, he wouldn't have gone through.

It's easy to dismiss the disability but I don't think you can to be honest.
Gregg_LUFC
29-05-2013
No one would find him funny if he wasn't disabled. The judges were all trying to see who could laugh the hardest. It was patronising from the very start
Grumpy_Alan
29-05-2013
Originally Posted by Gregg_LUFC:
“No one would find him funny if he wasn't disabled. The judges were all trying to see who could laugh the hardest. It was patronising from the very start”


Well said - and the oleaginous Walliams in particular is the master of patronising - if nothing else.
Lou416
29-05-2013
Originally Posted by egghead1:
“What does his jokes have to do with it?”


Everything?? He's a comedian.
Romola_Des_Loup
29-05-2013
I like him a lot and hope he wins. I find him very dry and very funny. His nerves showed a bit last night but that's to be expected.
egghead1
29-05-2013
Originally Posted by Lou416:
“Everything?? He's a comedian.”

You missed my point,or took it out of context at least.
sugarandspice
29-05-2013
This sounds nasty and i like that he is trying but i cant bring myself to laugh its good to see him trying though as he seems really really nice
SuperAPJ
30-05-2013
Originally Posted by Grumpy_Alan:
“oleaginous Walliams”

I've never heard that word before so I had to look it up. I presume you're going for the definition of 'Exaggeratedly and distastefully complimentary' rather than 'Rich in, covered with, or producing oil; oily or greasy'!
WhyHelloWorld
30-05-2013
I didn't even smile throughout his performance, or his audition.
Grumpy_Alan
30-05-2013
Originally Posted by SuperAPJ:
“I've never heard that word before so I had to look it up. I presume you're going for the definition of 'Exaggeratedly and distastefully complimentary' rather than 'Rich in, covered with, or producing oil; oily or greasy'!”

Take your pick!

But my preference is for #1


While you're at it, check out 'bovine', you'll find that one of the meanings fits Walliams to perfection.
Grumpy_Alan
30-05-2013
Originally Posted by WhyHelloWorld:
“I didn't even smile throughout his performance, or his audition.”


You know, till you wrote that I hadn't realised that he was meant to make me smile.

Sadly, he failed - miserably.

Nowhere as funny or amusing as any one of dozens of his age group selected at random from any school in the country.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map