Who was the 'middle aged woman' on you're fired?

4 of 4

tiggerspp

30-05-2013

Originally Posted by mimi123456:
“Zee was a prize knob, very full of himself and all that, but he was not sexist at all

........................

Blah blah blah

........................

so shut up with the sexism!”

Now listen sunshine, knock the giving orders on the head and show some respect to a superior intellect!

The guy came across as (amongst other things) sexist, deal with it!!!

mimi123456

30-05-2013

Originally Posted by tiggerspp:
“Now listen sunshine, knock the giving orders on the head and show some respect to a superior intellect!

The guy came across as (amongst other things) sexist, deal with it!!!”

*yawn* x 5

OK dear. Whatever you say.

tiggerspp

30-05-2013

Originally Posted by mimi123456:
“ Whatever you say. ”

Good, glad we cleared that up!!!

fireemblemcraze

30-05-2013

Tiggerspp - you have been incredibly rude on many of these topics. You come across as very immature.

I still don't see this. Zee was not sexist. He didn't dismiss Natalie because she was a girl, but because of her perceived weakness. She was clearly the weakest candidate on the team. Not having contributed a single bit to this task. She was therefore the right person to take into the boardroom as she's the weakest candidate of the lot!

He was not sexist against Leah either - clearly the woman had it in for him since the start, since she was outvoted for PM. And then she said to him really condescendingly and rudely 'I'm leader of the sub-team' - if you're dealing with such an aggressive/abrasive colleague and you bring them into the boardroom, is the correct explanation for it sexism? No, Leah had a personality problem with him. That was it.

The Rhydler

31-05-2013

Originally Posted by tiggerspp:
“I think he is Zee ”

I'm not the only one saying the truth, gang up on someone else!!

Stardog

08-06-2013

Originally Posted by Paul Wilson:
“Yeah, I found her quite unpleasant I have to say. Did he deserve to be fired?' (Stony) 'Yes.' Now some will say he deserved it, I just think there's ways and means.”

Agreed.

I just watched it on iPlayer. What a complete Feminazi. Finding sexism where there isn't any.

fireemblemcraze

08-06-2013

Originally Posted by tiggerspp:
“Some more??? You are just repeating what has already been said. Try reading the thread first.

Have you actually watched the show other than this week? LS is 'that close' to getting rid of Natalie, he has all but said it in those words and if she had been wrong in his eyes about her claims in the boardroom regarding Zee he had the perfect opportunity to fire her. He didn't thiough did he?!”

Mate I've watched the show since it's started. I really dislike some of you in this forum, how you consider yourselves to be such experts on the Apprentice - so proud of the fact that you've watched all 6 episodes of this season. News for you - so have I and I don't care.

No, it's probably because he's rich and arrogant that he doesn't care what accusations are being made. He only wants to spend money on a person he thinks it's worth going into business with. And besides even if he thought Natalie was being an idiot, he let her stay because of the fact that feminism runs rampant in this country and anything can be misinterpreted as sexism, especially firing a girl who has just made sexism claims. He didn't fire her in my opinion, because she showed some passion, something which Zee didn't really do.:yawn::yawn::yawn: I've said this so many times now.

NB - I'm a girl...so don't you dare suddenly say I'm sexist.

4 of 4