she puts me off the show entirely.
the way natalie argues is aggressive and horrible to watch
Originally Posted by flowers786:
“she puts me off the show entirely.”
“she puts me off the show entirely.”
I like Natalie but she was entirely justified going crazy tonight.
But her card is marked knowing next time in boardroom 3 she is off no matter who is there.
This is unfair as the others will know this which makes it easier to save themselves
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“I like Natalie but she was entirely justified going crazy tonight.
But her card is marked knowing next time in boardroom 3 she is off no matter who is there.
This is unfair as the others will know this which makes it easier to save themselves”
“I like Natalie but she was entirely justified going crazy tonight.
But her card is marked knowing next time in boardroom 3 she is off no matter who is there.
This is unfair as the others will know this which makes it easier to save themselves”
We've seen this before, though advanced years means I can't recall which series
, and on returning to the house the other surviver blabbed it straight out. Now if I were Leah I'd keep that little snippet to myself as Natalie will be a great fall guy should she ever need one 
Along with Uzma and Luisa she has no idea how to behave. Karen doesn't care for women who behave so unprofessionally.
For series 3, we had the 'make me project manager' card played twice in a row, and they both lost - Adam and Ghazal. Yep, we've definitely seen situations like this before. 
She shows her 'passion' in the boardroom alone, which is actually just a cover for her routine failure
She'll get squeezed out in time, not a hope of winning.
She'll get squeezed out in time, not a hope of winning.
In one boardroom, she shrieks and squeals like a banshee.
In another boardroom, she does the "look at me, I'm going to cry now".
Other than those 2 things, I can't say she has done much. She should have gone the week Sophie was given the boot!
In another boardroom, she does the "look at me, I'm going to cry now".
Other than those 2 things, I can't say she has done much. She should have gone the week Sophie was given the boot!
Originally Posted by Shrike:
“We've seen this before, though advanced years means I can't recall which series, and on returning to the house the other surviver blabbed it straight out. Now if I were Leah I'd keep that little snippet to myself as Natalie will be a great fall guy should she ever need one ”
“We've seen this before, though advanced years means I can't recall which series
, and on returning to the house the other surviver blabbed it straight out. Now if I were Leah I'd keep that little snippet to myself as Natalie will be a great fall guy should she ever need one ”
Wouldn't it be better if she DOES tell them. Since then if Leah is in a losing team she'll have at least one sure fire person (natalie) getting picked for the boardroom by the PM over herself.
Natalie is on borrowed time. She looked capable, if looks count at all, but other than than, she showed nothing so far of being capable of doing anything of importance.
Originally Posted by candyfloss2000:
“Wouldn't it be better if she DOES tell them. Since then if Leah is in a losing team she'll have at least one sure fire person (natalie) getting picked for the boardroom by the PM over herself.”
“Wouldn't it be better if she DOES tell them. Since then if Leah is in a losing team she'll have at least one sure fire person (natalie) getting picked for the boardroom by the PM over herself.”
Interesting point, but if you are the losing PM you really need a sure-fire stooge if you are to avoid Lord Sid's finger whereas if Leah tells all then Natalie will be gone first time she's on a losing team whether Leah is in the board room too or not.
Mind you I expect the others are savvy enough by series 9 to have worked out that Nat is on very thin ice anyway
Big chin doesnt even do anything. Hardly seen her on any task do anything. Shes not even hot, she looks like a cross between an alien and a skeleton, so god knows why sugars kept her in.
She'll be out soon enough as shes the worst one left
She'll be out soon enough as shes the worst one left
Originally Posted by gladiator18:
“Big chin doesnt even do anything. Hardly seen her on any task do anything. Shes not even hot, she looks like a cross between an alien and a skeleton, so god knows why sugars kept her in.
She'll be out soon enough as shes the worst one left”
“Big chin doesnt even do anything. Hardly seen her on any task do anything. Shes not even hot, she looks like a cross between an alien and a skeleton, so god knows why sugars kept her in.
She'll be out soon enough as shes the worst one left”
You don't need to be hot to be good. She's not that bad looking either, just very meh in terms of her skills set.
Originally Posted by mimi123456:
“In one boardroom, she shrieks and squeals like a banshee.
In another boardroom, she does the "look at me, I'm going to cry now".
Other than those 2 things, I can't say she has done much. She should have gone the week Sophie was given the boot!”
“In one boardroom, she shrieks and squeals like a banshee.
In another boardroom, she does the "look at me, I'm going to cry now".
Other than those 2 things, I can't say she has done much. She should have gone the week Sophie was given the boot!”
I don't think she does it on purpose, she seems to be just very emotional. Some people is like that, they show their real self just when they feel cornered. I don't think it's a very good trait in business... letting your emotions take over you. Also, her lack of manners worries me, raising your voice doesn't make you right. It just means more people can hear how wrong you are.
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“I like Natalie but she was entirely justified going crazy tonight.”
“I like Natalie but she was entirely justified going crazy tonight.”
Really? She may have been entirely justified in what she said, but the way she said it was appalling.
She casually tossed in the sexism card, and she is incapable of keeping her voice down. Even if she had fair points to make, no boss or colleague is going to be impressed by someone who can only make themselves heard by behaving like a petulant five-year old.
As I've said elsewhere, I'm not saying she wasn't right but I really do have a problem with the way she brought up the sexism issue.
The edit certainly makes Zee look sexist, but remember that we are only ever shown one angle of the narrative. In the scene we see in the car where Zee ignores Natalie, maybe she'd spent the previous 10 minutes offering silly suggestions or being aggressive towards Zee, which might have caused him to ignore her the way he did. I'm not saying that's what happened - and a lot of Zee's other behaviour did not help his case one iota - but it *could* have happened.
I think it would have been entirely justified for Natalie to question why her contributions were ignores, but to just jump in and cry sexism was a bit off. As a man in the business world, I have worked with female colleagues whose opinions I don't rate or Indian colleagues who I haven't enjoyed working with. That doesn't make me a sexist or a racist. If a female colleague approaches me in private and asks me why I chose to ignore a suggestion of hers in a meeting, I would of course take time to explain why. If she were to stomp her feet in a meeting in front of other people and accuse me of being a sexist, that's a whole different ball game.
Originally Posted by Tracy_Klein:
“I don't think she does it on purpose, she seems to be just very emotional. Some people is like that, they show their real self just when they feel cornered. I don't think it's a very good trait in business... letting your emotions take over you. Also, her lack of manners worries me, raising your voice doesn't make you right. It just means more people can hear how wrong you are.”
“I don't think she does it on purpose, she seems to be just very emotional. Some people is like that, they show their real self just when they feel cornered. I don't think it's a very good trait in business... letting your emotions take over you. Also, her lack of manners worries me, raising your voice doesn't make you right. It just means more people can hear how wrong you are.”
I totally agree. People get emotional, some more than others. But there's a fine line between being passionate and being out of control. This wasn't the first time that Natalie has been out of control in the boardroom. Business is all about different opinions and disagreements are inevitable. But in 20 years in business I have seen lots of passionate argument but I can count the number of times I have sat in a meeting where someone has behaved like Natalie did on the fingers of one hand. And none of them came out of it looking good. It's called being professional.
yeh she is annoying and hopefully gone soon.
but zee put his hand infront of a women and thus is truly evil lol
but zee put his hand infront of a women and thus is truly evil lol
Originally Posted by Tracy_Klein:
“I don't think she does it on purpose, she seems to be just very emotional. Some people is like that, they show their real self just when they feel cornered. I don't think it's a very good trait in business... letting your emotions take over you. Also, her lack of manners worries me, raising your voice doesn't make you right. It just means more people can hear how wrong you are.”
“I don't think she does it on purpose, she seems to be just very emotional. Some people is like that, they show their real self just when they feel cornered. I don't think it's a very good trait in business... letting your emotions take over you. Also, her lack of manners worries me, raising your voice doesn't make you right. It just means more people can hear how wrong you are.”
I think that will be one of the reasons she will be fired.
After the cow/horse/dog incident last week, I've lost all interest in her. Surely she can't be that dense.
She was just fighting for her life there. I understand her aggressiveness but this must be the very last resort and shall not be happening again
Originally Posted by The Rhydler:
“She shows her 'passion' in the boardroom alone, which is actually just a cover for her routine failure
She'll get squeezed out in time, not a hope of winning.”
“She shows her 'passion' in the boardroom alone, which is actually just a cover for her routine failure
She'll get squeezed out in time, not a hope of winning.”
Spot on.
If she showed half as much passion & verve during the tasks as she does in the boardroom, she be hot favourite to win it.
There's no point giving up during the task because one person doesn't listen to you, then screeching like a spoilt teenager & crying like a hungry baby in the boardroom when you get accused of doing nothing.
