Originally Posted by lightdragon:
“I need to go back and check, but there was an episode where Helen wanted to usurp Melody as PM, and Melody was having none of it. I'm sure Shugs said it would've been bad news for Helen if she had succeeded.
You may not like what your PM is doing, but you're supposed to show some respect, and if the PM fooks up, it's up to LAS not a candidate to remove them.”
I think it would have been bad news for Melody, not for Helen. Helen didn't want to usurp Melody, she politely asked if she could take over from her because she wasn't confident about Melody's leadership, and because she (Helen) had a 100% winning record including two past wins as PM, and thought that she could do a better job. I don't know why the BBC put it on YouTube under 'Helen's hostile takeover'; there was nothing hostile about it, she just wanted to win the task, and thought that they'd have a better chance if she was the PM.
Melody on the other hand would have been in deep trouble if she'd let Helen take over. That shows a lot of weakness as PM, which Sugar would not have liked. (Of course she was fired on that task anyway, but she'd have been criticised even more if she'd let Helen take over.)