|
||||||||
J Lo Controversy is Ridiculous! |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,733
|
J Lo Controversy is Ridiculous!
First of all it was a stage costume, most artists wear clothes like this these days on stage look at people like Lady Gaga and Rihanna.
And it was 40 minutes after the watershed so there is no way that OFCOM should get involved. It's a family show yes but it was after the watershed end of story. People love to complain to OFCOM about everything these days. People need to lighten up, don't let your kids watch after the watershed. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4,061
|
Try being a teenage boy watching it with your parents in the room!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,733
|
Quote:
Try being a teenage boy watching it with your parents in the room!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 17,128
|
I wouldn't complain to Ofcom, but I don't care for a gynaecological view of her crack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,156
|
Didn't see the performance but saw the pics and Simons comments world class.......
Sorry I can't put them together harmoniously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 731
|
She's absolutely gorgeous, and the outfit was no more than a leotard and thigh high boots.
People complaining need to get a life, I could watch that over...and over...and over
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 905
|
Does make me laugh when you get the likes of the Daily Mail getting all indignant and then PRINTING THE PICTURES!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4,061
|
Quote:
I am and was
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South London
Posts: 4,076
|
Mine and most of my friend's kids didn't see the performance because we're responsible parents who don't let our children watch post-watershed television... But our kids have seen the pictures splashed all over the cover of "outraged" newspapers in all the shops.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
|
I agree. Some people go crazy over nothing. She looked hot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 11,227
|
Some idiots at the mail trying to whip up a bit of fake outrage is hardly a controversy. No one gives a shit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 17,128
|
I laughed at the extremely heavy breathing at the end, could barely make out what she was saying amongst the breaths into the mic and yet when she was "singing live" she sounded so crisp and clear. A bit like Cheryl Cole.
Funny that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,885
|
I can't see anything wrong with it and she is covered up apart from a bit of her legs.
JLO shows a bit of leg and people go mad saying she's dressing inappropriately for kids. You'd think we're in Dubai/ Arabia with some peoples reactions. It's just a performance and far many other celebrities have worn less. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 17,128
|
Quote:
I can't see anything wrong with it and she is covered up apart from a bit of her legs.
JLO shows a bit of leg and people go mad saying she's dressing inappropriately for kids. You'd think we're in Dubai/ Arabia with some peoples reactions. It's just a performance and far many other celebrities have worn less. The country was her gynaecologist. If someone's covered up over their entire body except their titties and fanny, would you say "But she had mostly clothes on.". Lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,885
|
She was asked to perform that routine
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-en...e-8637432.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: pandaria
Posts: 1,163
|
As I posted on the main Page of DS covering this story.
Its the Daily Mail say no more the paper that loves to moan and complain but has no problems showing the "offending" pictures all in the name of revulsion of course ![]() the same paper has no problems showing Celebs with either barely nothing on or pictures so unflattering with an Editorial that would destroy anyone's confidence. no more likely someone there cant believe a 43 year old can have a body like that..isn't that like 190years old In Daily Mail years? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,022
|
A bit em erotic.
But it was shown after the 9pm watershed so ITV not breaking any rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
Does make me laugh when you get the likes of the Daily Mail getting all indignant and then PRINTING THE PICTURES!
any kid can pick up a newspaper in a shop and open 1 page, now shouldn't that be classed as worse than what was on BGT ?These people that complain are pathetic and need to get a grip. Complaining to Ofcom |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,858
|
Quote:
could barely make out what she was saying amongst the breaths into the mic and yet when she was "singing live" she sounded so crisp and clear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,444
|
Quote:
First of all it was a stage costume, most artists wear clothes like this these days on stage look at people like Lady Gaga and Rihanna.
And it was 40 minutes after the watershed so there is no way that OFCOM should get involved. It's a family show yes but it was after the watershed end of story. People love to complain to OFCOM about everything these days. People need to lighten up, don't let your kids watch after the watershed. Saddam wasn't that bad, he's no different to Hitler or Mussolini. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,474
|
I don't think the argument is ridiculous.
The show, which can be seen from all the kiddie contestants this year, is clearly aimed at families and particularly those with young kids. Young girls are sexualised far too much these days via the media causing all sorts of problems and mixed messages.. Showing a performer in such a revealing costume with open-leg crotch shots is not for this type of show-post watershed or not . If this is deemed acceptable for a family show then young girls will get the message that it's OK to dress like a prostitute and flaunt their bodies when they do not actually have a clue about the connotations involved.As for the show asking her to wear that costume that is proof that they want press headlines at any cost. Wrong,wrong wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 7,222
|
Quote:
I wouldn't complain to Ofcom, but I don't care for a gynaecological view of her crack.
It's as if she wants the audience to smell it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,968
|
I can't be bothered to be outraged but surely if someone is a good singer with a good song, they don't need to be showing their vaginas to sell it? I did see more of her than I wanted to and her crotch getting thrust at me on a 55 inch screen was a bit disturbing. Would I be bothered to complain? No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: The Shire
Posts: 459
|
Quote:
It's a weak argument when you compare her to two other sluts.
Saddam wasn't that bad, he's no different to Hitler or Mussolini.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 15,936
|
I love the Daily Mail's reporting of this.
They create an article concerning apparent outrage over the performance, whilst filling the article with at least 15 photographs of her outfit and dance routine and even link a video of it! They really are laughable. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:39.



Sorry I can't put them together harmoniously.

The country was her gynaecologist.
But it was shown after the 9pm watershed so ITV not breaking any rules.
. If this is deemed acceptable for a family show then young girls will get the message that it's OK to dress like a prostitute and flaunt their bodies when they do not actually have a clue about the connotations involved.