Originally Posted by Jedikiah:
“I thought there was barely a weak track from 67, but i think it is a stretch to even begin to describe 1990 as 'music'. Horrible artificial tinny sound, full of irritating production gimmicks. It is amazing just how quickly the decline in pop came in the second half of the eighties. I know what you mean about Tony. He'd have had some witty remarks, or amusing anecdotes to help make this chart go down easier. Not sure Gambo would be able to salvage this one, though.”
“I thought there was barely a weak track from 67, but i think it is a stretch to even begin to describe 1990 as 'music'. Horrible artificial tinny sound, full of irritating production gimmicks. It is amazing just how quickly the decline in pop came in the second half of the eighties. I know what you mean about Tony. He'd have had some witty remarks, or amusing anecdotes to help make this chart go down easier. Not sure Gambo would be able to salvage this one, though.”
I couldn't agree more. 1967 was brilliant. It has been for 49 years.
1990 was atrocious.
Going back to the 1967 chart. The number one was my mam's favourite pop song. She liked classical music more, especially Chopin. The vocals by the Tremeloes are awesome.




”