Originally Posted by Apprentice 2 SA:
“I see the point then if neither Radio 1 or 2 wants the 90s. The problem is that the charts began to change during the 80s and 90s, and stopped reflecting a wide range of music. The 78 chart of this week, for example, has disco, pop, hard rock, soft rock, punk in various guises, comedy records, eurovision songs, film soundtracks, music in a 50s style, music in a 30s style... It's very hard to catagorise all the different styles in one Top 40. ”
The 1978 chart is wildly varied as proved each week on TV this year.
What constitutes a "mainstream chart" in this country nowadays, in other words the official top forty as broadcast on Radio 1, is infact nothing of the sort in my opinion, and is no more than yet another "type" of chart. In no way can it anymore claim to be a truly national mainsteam music chart surely? How did this happen?
Also, the sound of a chart from, let's take 1974 and then 1981 as per last weeks show, or even more so with 1966 to 1976 in the coming weekends edition, there was a definite kind of sound in those years that did not last long until things changed. Now however, in 2013, you could go way back to 1993 with tracks sounding much the same. Music from 2000 could be music from 2010 as if the decade never existed between.
Not forgetting if Tony starts playing charts from 2000 onwards many of them will have absolutely NO climbers, just a succession of new entries and downers, which made the British singles chart from about 1995 to 2006 an absolute discredited joke not worthy of looking at, such as one of the worst chart behaviour years in history when in 2000 about 12 consecutive weeks had a new number one debuting straight at the top. That was never credible. I want to hear meaningful charts on Pick Of The Pops.
I recall back in January 1989 when Fluff returned with Pick Of The Pops to Radio 1 on a Sunday afternoon, one of that days charts he "picked" was from just 7 years earlier in 1982, and at the time to me it felt like an entire pop era ago, which infact it more or less was.