Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“Yes, I'm not disagreeing with you at all. I wouldn't any more blame Jordan for the complete failure for the task than I would Rebecca.
A lot of what we think now is based on hindsight knowing what the eventual result turned out to be. At the time I'm not sure how easy it would be to know whether you are spending too much or not. It's highly dependent on the final result which nobody would have a clue about until they look back on it in hindsight.
These tasks can be so arbitrary and down to luck that I don't think it's quite the same as doing something in real life.
So many variables are thrown at them, which are probably mostly fictional, that it must be a bloody hard task to plan for anything.
How many businesses with such a small workforce would sack somebody each week until there's only one left? It's ludicrous really. It's just not a realistic situation, it's a contrived game where only two teams are pitted against each other doing nonsense tasks. A small team would just pick themselves up, review the situation, and come up with a new strategy for next time and try again.
I agree with your points because in these tasks how would any of them know whether they're spending too much or not in something of this nature until they've found out the results at the end. In hindsight it's easy to look back and say oh they've spent too much, but at the time how would anyone know?”
“Yes, I'm not disagreeing with you at all. I wouldn't any more blame Jordan for the complete failure for the task than I would Rebecca.
A lot of what we think now is based on hindsight knowing what the eventual result turned out to be. At the time I'm not sure how easy it would be to know whether you are spending too much or not. It's highly dependent on the final result which nobody would have a clue about until they look back on it in hindsight.
These tasks can be so arbitrary and down to luck that I don't think it's quite the same as doing something in real life.
So many variables are thrown at them, which are probably mostly fictional, that it must be a bloody hard task to plan for anything.
How many businesses with such a small workforce would sack somebody each week until there's only one left? It's ludicrous really. It's just not a realistic situation, it's a contrived game where only two teams are pitted against each other doing nonsense tasks. A small team would just pick themselves up, review the situation, and come up with a new strategy for next time and try again.
I agree with your points because in these tasks how would any of them know whether they're spending too much or not in something of this nature until they've found out the results at the end. In hindsight it's easy to look back and say oh they've spent too much, but at the time how would anyone know?”
Hindsight is certainly a luxury we enjoy that the candidates don't. As with many things we watch, it's much easier to be a Monday morning quarterback than to actually be in the pressure situation of doing the tasks. Which is why you'll never get me doing anything like The Apprentice!




) I think she should have been commended for sticking with it as it can indeed be one of the best things about these kind of events.
) her Audrey Hepburn impersonation and low cut LBDs in the boardroom were very annoying.To me.