Originally Posted by
neutralned:
“Except he (or she) is not. People judged as more attractive than average by a sample group have been found to earn MORE than their less attractive counterparts.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...418204842.html
So that would mean that the people who post on Digital Spy would have to be an incredibly skewed sample of society to badly judge attractive, confident women, as the OP is hypothesising. In the real world, as proven through various studies, attractive confident women - and men - earn more than their gender peer group. Of course, every DS poster could have come here straight from the Daily Mail website, but I doubt it. Being rude is not seen as an attractive trait and Zee has definitely already been shown plenty of 'hate' for it, and I believe Alex will be soon as well, unless he curbs his back seat abuse sessions. The two most confident women I can remember in the series are Ruth Badger and that really horrible one who dated the soldier for a little while. Neither of them were attractive but I'm sure they drew plenty of ire on these forums for their brusque manner, or Machiavellian tendencies, or downright rudeness. I think the majority of posters here are able to differentiate their opinions about the candidates' looks from their opinions about the candidates' personalities.
The basis of the hypothesis is that ' you is all hatin' cos you is well jel of / challenged by Luisa's looks and personality'. If that was true there would be hundreds of posts about hating Leah from the get go, as she is IMO more confident and more attractive than Luisa. In reality, the dislike threads of Leah started to arrive when the poorer aspects of her personality were exposed, as she rebelled against her PM, and then ignored her team. It simply is NOT about looks for the majority of posters.”
Not sure if you are being serious or are on the wind up?
Firstly I'm not sure why you post that link, as it has no relevance to my comments really. Without meaning to sound rude, the link doesn't really tell me anything I didn't already know. Also I'm talking about posters on DS, not employers per se.
Right on to the next bit- I don't mean to patronise (so my apologies if this comes across this way) but I think you miss the point.
My sole criticism is that the level of dislike towards some (please note I say SOME, not all) confident attractive women on DS is entirely disproportionate from my observations.
I think the whole 'jealous' (aka jellus) argument I see on here is a weak one on
both sides and not accurate IMO. For the record I do not think jealousy is the reason.
Whilst we're on the subject- the bog standard reply from people accused of being 'jelus' is, ''oh but I really like (insert name of attractive female person) so I can't be jealous'' holds no water.
It's as weak as someone making a racist joke then saying 'I can't be racist cos my mate's black'. Mutually exclusive they are not.
Ok rather tenuous link I agree, but the best I can do right now so please forgive me. Hopefully some people will get the point I am trying to make.
Anyway I digress. With the greatest of respect I disagree on several fronts with the last part of your post IMO-
1) Luisa started to get stick on here before her 'character' came out on the show
2) Whilst I actually agree with you that Leah is better looking, this is ONLY your opinion, and therefore cannot
prove anything of the sort.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm no massive fan of Luisa, however I do like to play Devil's Advocate.
Jeez, that was waaay more long winded than I first intended. I know I'm outnumbered in my opinion on this but I'm a big boy so can take the abuse about to come my way!