• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
No...I'm Natalie Holt
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
Happy Gilmore
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Green_Stamp:
“Not by you though. Coward.”

You keep on having an episode.

I hope you don't personally know the bitch, that would be awful trying to justify her actions. Her family must be absolutely ashamed of her.
Keiō Line
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Eurostar:
“That was their big moment though. I'm not sure anyone wants the highlight of their career to be gatecrashed by an intruder deflecting attention away from themselves.”

It's hard not to agree, but in the scheme of things, I can't help but feel the greater good has been achieved.
CARA2000
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Callous:
“...tell that to the semi final acts who Simon and others interrupted with a loud buzzer midway through their performance..

...a smiling egg thrower is less of an interruption (as long as they aren't throwing the eggs at the act).”

Simon Cowell is one of the rudest and most cruel men on TV.

I find it extraordinary that some are complaining about what this girl has done and condone that moron's behaviour.

He spoilt the Arthur Lager act at the end by subjecting the audience to the promotion of Sinnitta in the most vomit-worthy way. We are constantly subjected to the over-exposure of his sickening, lick *** acts.

About time someone gave him a taste of his own medicine.

I think the timing of this was absolutely right.

As a fan of Richard and Adam I hope this catapults them and they get recognition they might never have expected.
Diane
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by CARA2000:
“
I think the timing of this was absolutely right.

.”

Then you're as misguided as the stupid woman is, no excuse for spoiling someone's act just to get yourself 2 mins of fame.
jg.
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Diane:
“Then you're as misguided as the stupid woman is, no excuse for spoiling someone's act just to get yourself 2 mins of fame.”

absolutely well said. No excuse whatsoever.
CARA2000
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Diane:
“Then you're as misguided as the stupid woman is, no excuse for spoiling someone's act just to get yourself 2 mins of fame.”

Misguided is believing anyone would do this for 2 minutes of fame. Now think about it.
Callous
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Diane:
“Then you're as misguided as the stupid woman is, no excuse for spoiling someone's act just to get yourself 2 mins of fame.”

They better take the buzzers away from the judges then...

...and remove everyone from the audience who boo or chant "off,off,off".

Both far more humiliating and likely to spoil an act..than someone randomly coming on and chucking eggs at a judge.
whoyouarexo
09-06-2013
That blog is one of the most stuck up things ive ever read.

They arent stupid girls, of course they know its going to be a bit of a machine. But the way it was worded made it sound like they were so above all the fans, all the contestants, the whole process.

It was a choice, they could of said no.

Couldnt be happier they didnt get through, that blog shows the true colours, as does Natalies selfish, bitter egg throwing.
Sclark78
09-06-2013
She's a complete idiot, end of.
lightblues
09-06-2013
She slags off the programme and then accepts a gig to go back and mime in a string section and then ,wants us to believe she was protesting about miming when she's just earnt some money for doing just that. The woman is up her own backside and was totally out of order regardless of her views on Simon Cowell
Musicman103
09-06-2013
The girl has a BIT of a point in her blog (ie it's all fake and Cowell has no room to judge classical musicians) but it then turns into a scathing, sneering account of the entire process, the judges, the film crew, the producers and everyone else in the building.

Why did she feel like a concentration camp prisoner whilst waiting backstage?

The worst that was going to happen is 4 people saying "No"
Fudd
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Callous:
“...tell that to the semi final acts who Simon and others interrupted with a loud buzzer midway through their performance..

...a smiling egg thrower is less of an interruption (as long as they aren't throwing the eggs at the act).”

The acts who take part in the show know the risk of the buzzers. They do not expect to be interrupted by egg throwers.
ArtistBaptista
09-06-2013
Out of all the reality shows Britain's Got Talent is the most notorious for treating their contestants appallingly.

Over the years we've had some real disgruntled contestants, not just the ones that have been rejected, but also ones that have actually got the chance to perform in the semi-finals like that Jessica girl and the two singers who worked in Tesco. Not to mention the guy who said he felt suicidal after being rejected this year.

You can choose to turn a blind eye to this if you want to, but well done to Natalie for bringing it to everyone's attention and overshadowing the final.
Mercury88
09-06-2013
I thought the first part was interesting too, would like to see the rest.
Zizu58
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Happy Gilmore:
“Hope the cretin gets egged wherever she goes. Really took away from someone else's moment there, disgraceful, disgusting and childish, they shouldn't let her off she should be charged.”

Now that would be funny and at the same time she'd be getting just what she deserves.
miss buzzybee
09-06-2013
Totally appalled at the names some people have called her on the forum. If a man had done the same I wonder if the names would be just as harsh.

Most musicians hate the BGT/X Factor bandwagon. I don't condone what she's done, but it was just eggs ffs and no charges are being pressed!. People moaning about it are just keeping the thing alive.
Musicman103
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by ArtistBaptista:
“Out of all the reality shows Britain's Got Talent is the most notorious for treating their contestants appallingly.

Over the years we've had some real disgruntled contestants, not just the ones that have been rejected, but also ones that have actually got the chance to perform in the semi-finals like that Jessica girl and the two singers who worked in Tesco. Not to mention the guy who said he felt suicidal after being rejected this year.

You can choose to turn a blind eye to this if you want to, but well done to Natalie for bringing it to everyone's attention and overshadowing the final.”

but isn't that more to do with him than anyone else?

People commit suicide because they fail their exams as well.
twogunthom
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Keiō Line:
“It's hard not to agree, but in the scheme of things, I can't help but feel the greater good has been achieved.”

eggs-actly mate you cant make an omelette without breaking a few eggs, Simon should sign her up for next year before she gets poached.
Topol
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by miss buzzybee:
“Totally appalled at the names some people have called her on the forum. If a man had done the same I wonder if the names would be just as harsh.

Most musicians hate the BGT/X Factor bandwagon. I don't condone what she's done, but it was just eggs ffs and no charges are being pressed!. People moaning about it are just keeping the thing alive.”

Well by the looks of the front pages she's not shying away from the spotlight and keeping it alive herself.

As a fellow artist she should have some respect any act that made the final doesn't have to win to find long term success that's the part of this really annoys me.

she could have thrown the eggs from any angle but not she had to stand right in the middle of the performance and I believe that's what's angered so many coupled into that all the front pages she's coming across as a total attention seeker.
Callous
09-06-2013
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“The acts who take part in the show know the risk of the buzzers. They do not expect to be interrupted by egg throwers.”

I'd much rather be interrupted by an egg thrower than a buzzer (as long as the eggs weren't aimed at me)...especially when the egg thrower interruption would guarantee me more votes.
Topol
09-06-2013
5 front pages. yet not one clear headline why she did it meaning anyone reading the story wont pay the slightest notice of the real story (if there is one)

Not seen one story saying poor Simon its the means she decided to protest is the failure.

*edited the links..sky's paper section having funny 5 mins..
Reality Sucks
09-06-2013
I would have liked to read the second half of the blog about the deliberation stage. It's always good to get some behind the scenes stuff.

However, what she did was a bit ridiculous. Were Raven cut at the deliberation stage or did they get through to the live shows? Presumably if they'd made the final or actually won the thing she wouldn't have been throwing eggs a year later.

It comes across a bit bitter really and when you're in a profession like that you know that these reality shows are a bit exploitative and it's a gamble going on them.
Fudd
10-06-2013
Originally Posted by Callous:
“I'd much rather be interrupted by an egg thrower than a buzzer (as long as the eggs weren't aimed at me)...especially when the egg thrower interruption would guarantee me more votes.”

Fair point but the buzzers are a risk that acts have to accept...egg throwing shouldn't be.
workhorse
10-06-2013
Originally Posted by Topol:
“5 front pages. yet not one clear headline why she did it meaning anyone reading the story wont pay the slightest notice of the real story (if there is one)

Not seen one story saying poor Simon its the means she decided to protest is the failure.

*edited the links..sky's paper section having funny 5 mins..”

I still haven't worked out why she did it.am I alone?
topcat3
10-06-2013
Originally Posted by workhorse:
“I still haven't worked out why she did it.am I alone?”

because she was rejected last year some people don't take rejection very well
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map