• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
The Apprentice - S9E7 - Tonight 9pm - Caravans
<<
<
36 of 37
>>
>
Mr Teacake
12-06-2013
Was quite cringey seeing Natalie when Kurt spoke on the phione asking for eye candy to be sent over, although I think she's a very strong woman and quite liked her.
AceMcCloud
12-06-2013
Originally Posted by Letterwriter:
“Could someone clarify for a slow one here.

Was the £33k of sales 3x£11k trailer tents?
Or 2 trailer tents and a lot of electric bikes.

It's just Luisa did seem to be doing well selling those bikes but I didn't catch it it the tot up

Cheers”

They got ~£3000 on the bikes and the other thing
Dan-Bevis
12-06-2013
Originally Posted by mazzy50:
“That shot of Alex was terrifying.”

Amen.


Surprised to see that in the beginning, Neil looked to have no chest hair?

Thought Kurt came across much better on You're Fired then he did most of the time on the show. Always had that sombre, wounded look going on.

Neil and Kurt... If I ever could. Hmm.
slouchingthatch
13-06-2013
Cringeworthy at times and a bit too predictable in terms of the final result. A pretty average episode, overall.

Thought Sugar was fully justified in firing both Kurt and Natalie, not just for their (lack of) performance on this task but earlier ones too.

Kurt had shown himself to be too prone to errors of judgement (couldn't see the big picture on the farm shop task, inches/centimeres in Dubai) and Natalie has shown very little positive throughout other than an annoying tendency to blame everyone for everything and claim that she knew all the errors her team made with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight.

My usual thoughts in my weekly recap. Carry on Camping, people:

http://slouchingtowardstv.com/2013/0...ouble-trouble/
slouchingthatch
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by Letterwriter:
“Could someone clarify for a slow one here.

Was the £33k of sales 3x£11k trailer tents?
Or 2 trailer tents and a lot of electric bikes.

It's just Luisa did seem to be doing well selling those bikes but I didn't catch it it the tot up

Cheers”

We saw Luisa sell one bike and one kids' kit, and nothing from Jordan or Francesca (although obviously other sales were made off-camera).

Bike plus kits sold £3,116.

Jason sold one camper (we saw Sugar congratulate him in the boardroom on his "sale" (not "sales")), so Neil presumably sold two - totalling £30,499.

Grand total for Evolve £33,615.
PrincessTT
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by slouchingthatch:
“We saw Luisa sell one bike and one kids' kit, and nothing from Jordan or Francesca (although obviously other sales were made off-camera).

Bike plus kits sold £3,116.

Jason sold one camper (we saw Sugar congratulate him in the boardroom on his "sale" (not "sales")), so Neil presumably sold two - totalling £30,499.

Grand total for Evolve £33,615.”

I wonder how much discount they gave when they sold them, must have been a considerable amount.
miss buzzybee
13-06-2013
Neil was horrible!. Hope he gets fired soon! .. and he needs to shave his neck!
slouchingthatch
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by PrincessTT:
“I wonder how much discount they gave when they sold them, must have been a considerable amount.”

I forget what the exact retail price was, but I think it was around £11k.

Looking back at my notes (which I take for my blog) Jason made his sale for £10k. We saw Neil make one at the end for £10.5k. Total trailer sales were £30,499, so the third sale (it;s implied it was made by Neil) must have been about £10k too. So it looks like they offered discounts of between £500 and £1000 - I'm assuming they agreed with the vendor up front that they could go as far as X on discounts, presumably £1000.
PrincessTT
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by slouchingthatch:
“I forget what the exact retail price was, but I think it was around £11k.

Looking back at my notes (which I take for my blog) Jason made his sale for £10k. We saw Neil make one at the end for £10.5k. Total trailer sales were £30,499, so the third sale (it;s implied it was made by Neil) must have been about £10k too. So it looks like they offered discounts of between £500 and £1000 - I'm assuming they agreed with the vendor up front that they could go as far as X on discounts, presumably £1000.”

Thank you.
slouchingthatch
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by PrincessTT:
“Thank you.”

No problem, The sales figures should be accurate - the permitted level of discount is speculation, but I doubt they would have been permitted much more than that.
AA2009
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by miss buzzybee:
“Neil was horrible!. Hope he gets fired soon! .. and he needs to shave his neck!”

He was PM of a team that won by £33,000.
DavetheScot
13-06-2013
Interesting to read the comments in the last few posts about discounting; although Leah has been attacked for asking about discounting, it's clear the other team must have raised this too. I guess they did it more tactfully though.

Kurt was the right one to go. Not only did he select the wrong caravan, not only was he a poor salesman, but he chose to be on the sales team for the high-price item for his own glory, not because he thought he was the right man for the role.
Bomani channing
13-06-2013
The last 2-3 episodes sans the boardroom scenes have been really boring
chrono88
13-06-2013
NID firings this week.
brb
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by Bomani channing:
“The last 2-3 episodes sans the boardroom scenes have been really boring”

I really like this weeks episode Well, except Kurt being fired. And Natalie. i didn't really like Natalie, but I couldn't help but feel sorry for her, although it was obvious that Lord Sugar wasn't a fan so she would never of won anyway.

Next weeks episode looks to be amazing.
chrono88
13-06-2013
Alex still hasn't been a PM. He should be doing it next week I reckon?
brb
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by chrono88:
“Alex still hasn't been a PM. He should be doing it next week I reckon?”

Neither has Jason, I don't think? Lord Sugar seemed a bit annoyed that Alex wasn't PM this week. I think next week Sugar will make Jason and Alex be the PMs - preferably with team Jason winning and Alex going home.
slouchingthatch
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by brb:
“Neither has Jason, I don't think? Lord Sugar seemed a bit annoyed that Alex wasn't PM this week. I think next week Sugar will make Jason and Alex be the PMs - preferably with team Jason winning and Alex going home.”

Jason was the winning PM in week 1. Having unsuccessfully tried to step forward as PM this week, I'm sure Sugar will step in sooner rather than later to force the issue. But credit to him for not ducking and hiding and at least trying to put himself forward.
kwynne42
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“What's the obsession with the older market”

They did market research of observing who was driving caravans on their way to Birmingham, not entirely scientific.
kwynne42
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by In Arcadia Ego:
“Alex. Another one it'd be nice to get rid of this week. Any chance of a triple firing? Across both teams?”

Nearly.
maidinscotland
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by Oldnjaded:
“He's an Oscar Pistorius lookalike and yes, I need him. ”

As long as it's only lookalike or you'd end up getting fired if you got him!
TXF0429
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by Bomani channing:
“The last 2-3 episodes sans the boardroom scenes have been really boring”

You kidding? This episode and Dubai I thought were brilliant. I didn't like last week as much but that had more to do with candidates failing than anything else.
abercrombie
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by Psycho_Ned:
“Haha Nick chucks the hand grenade in!”

Everyone saying 'naughty Nick', but that's what he's there for.
Do you think he's just some facially athletic watcher?
He's there to observe and report.
slouchingthatch
13-06-2013
Originally Posted by kwynne42:
“They did market research of observing who was driving caravans on their way to Birmingham, not entirely scientific.”

To be fair, that was probably all they were allowed to do, and they would have confirmed it in their wander around the show itself once they'd arrived in Birmingham. As it was, their unscientific research was right - they just chose to ignore it when in came to actually selecting the product.
neutralned
14-06-2013
Oh dear, I am very suspicious as to why Sugardaddy called Jason back in to praise him; yes, he sold one, but Neil sold two, so why is Jason being singled out for his single sale? Is it 'you're so f***ing useless, I'm amazed you managed to do anything good' or 'I'm doing this to help justify my decision to hire you at the end, despite the fact you're sh!t, because you have a great business plan'?

I thought Neil and Luisa did very well on that task, altho Luisa managed to blot her copy book yet again, by answering Sugardaddy's question to Neil. Not sure why Leah was given credit for almost closing a sale, unless she made a sale and credit fell through, but then why would they not say that, as that's much more impressive?

No idea why the eye candy comment caused such furore, sex sells. I remember a US Apprentice where the all female team dressed up in short shorts and took guys on bike trips, basically inviting them to stare at their bums for half an hour. Thankfully their team lost. Not sure about caravan shows, but exhibitions I've been at for the building trade have featured scantily clad 'demonstration girls'.

Still seem a weak bunch of candidates, Myles should have shone on this task, and didn't, Alex does nothing but whinge and moan, Leah and Luisa's interpersonal skills are non-existent, Jordan comes across as very obnoxious for some reason I can't put my finger on, the lap dancer is generally invisible and should have gone last week, and Jason is a bumbling incompetent. Neil would have looked average on previous seasons, but the one eyed man is king in this wasteland.
<<
<
36 of 37
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map