|
||||||||
did anyone else feel for Natalie? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,609
|
did anyone else feel for Natalie?
She wass clearly a scapegoat
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,291
|
I do feel sorry for her. Luisa would have looked after her more if they had been on the same team more often
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,806
|
Not at all. She deserved to go. About time and all.
The waterworks didn't work for her this time either. Maybe she can go back to CandyFloss and sing songs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,550
|
Really. I thought that Natalie was out of her depth and hasn't shown enough to qualify her to stay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,019
|
Didn't really see the point of Natalie, she didn't seem to do much of anything in any given task.
Think she would have been happier on Big Brother. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,291
|
Quote:
Didn't really see the point of Natalie, she didn't seem to do much of anything in any given task.
Think she would have been happier on Big Brother. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,579
|
She just told Dara on the spin off show that she wears high heels for 'comfort' ... she's making a bit of a fool of herself all-round really
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
Really. I thought that Natalie was out of her depth and hasn't shown enough to qualify her to stay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,420
|
Quote:
She just told Dara on the spin off show that she wears high heels for 'comfort' ... she's making a bit of a fool of herself all-round really
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,274
|
She came across well on YF but I think it was her time to go, she was being carried by the others and had been for a couple of weeks IMO. Nice girl though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Swansea
Posts: 871
|
No - they all know what they're in for in this programme. I bet she wouldn't give a damn if you were stood there in tears in front of her. That's the sort of people they are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,274
|
Quote:
No need to fire two though, and there was no reason this week after Lord Sugar had told Kurt to bring people back on this task. She sold more than Kurt or Myles, she was less responsible for not geting the products they wanted than Leah, and Alex and Kurt made the fatal product choice. Myles has a PM win , but this confirmed the suspicions then about his ability to buy/sell which seems crucial to his proposal. If he wants to fire two this week, its just not going to be Alex - so it would have been whoever else who was brought back with Kurt.
They lost the task because they failed to get the products they wanted - the main responsibility for that was down to Leah. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 964
|
No. She seemed to 'disappear' on tasks and surface in the boardroom. I disliked her boardroom behaviour and what I saw as her emotional manipulativeness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11,975
|
just like Rebecca last week Alan should of given Natalie another chance
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,128
|
Quote:
Not at all. She deserved to go. About time and all.
The waterworks didn't work for her this time either. Maybe she can go back to CandyFloss and sing songs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,311
|
I liked Natalie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Westish
Posts: 3,157
|
Quote:
She just told Dara on the spin off show that she wears high heels for 'comfort' ... she's making a bit of a fool of herself all-round really
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,291
|
I am sure nuts will be on the phone to see what her price is
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Westish
Posts: 3,157
|
Quote:
She came across well on YF but I think it was her time to go, she was being carried by the others and had been for a couple of weeks IMO. Nice girl though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
Quote:
She wass clearly a scapegoat
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,806
|
Quote:
LOL whats this got to do with me?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,579
|
Quote:
Flat shoes are out if you’re used to wearing high heels. The muscle and tendon are stretched beyond their normal range of movement and the foot needs the lift of a heel to compensate. Natalie was correct.
I'm not being flippant Cressida, that's a serious question ( just out of interest ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
No, she had to go. I think her asking Kurt whether "is this tactical" was itself tactical. I don't think he was thinking about Sugar's warning when he brought her in, he had genuine reasons to bring her back. She wanted to make sure Sugar thought that was really why she was being brought back, not her failures on the task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: That thar Leeds (in the North)
Posts: 260
|
Quote:
His genuine reasons were tactical though. He blamed her for what Leah had got wrong - but picked Natalie, who had been identified as being at risk, over Leah - who would fight better, and whom they all seem wary of. He couldn't bring Myles back for failing to sell, because that meant underlining his own failure to sell. I think Lord Sugar sees something in Alex, though, and would have had to fire whoever else Kurt brought back in if he really wanted to lose 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
She wass clearly a scapegoat
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:32.




