• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Leah didn't seem to mind being thought of as eye-candy
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
The Rhydler
14-06-2013
Other than that - you like her?
AOTB
14-06-2013
Originally Posted by The Rhydler:
“Other than that - you like her?”

Ha ha, Yeah I couldn't quite tell if that poster was a Leah fan or not. Tough to tell...
The Rhydler
14-06-2013
Well, I wouldn't be that mean about her appearance, but certainly I agree with his assessment of her manner
allafix
14-06-2013
I think the accusations of sexism only come out when things go wrong. Leah saw her appearance as eye-candy as a chance to save the day, and she very nearly did (by being a better sales person). So why would she then complain about it being sexist? With things looking bleak, Natalie saw it as a chance to fight her way out of a corner by making Kurt look bad (as she had also tried with her "don't be tactical" comment).

Women apply double standards about this (treble standards if you include the sexist comments they make about men). They dress and make up to appear sexually attractive but then complain of being seen as a sex object or eye candy. If they dressed in a more businesslike way it wouldn't happen. If you really want to avoid being treated like a sex object it's probably best not to dress like a sex object and act like a sex object.

No one, female or male, should be on the receiving end of unwanted sexual comments or attention, but if you dress and act in such a way to take advantage then you are in part responsible for how you are perceived.
The Rhydler
14-06-2013
I agree with some of that. Especially the double standards that are rife.
Dogmatix
16-06-2013
Originally Posted by James_B1:
“I'm really confused as to why so many people find Leah attractive. [...] She's the exact opposite to what I'd consider eye candy.”

Candiness is in the eye of the beholder....
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map