Originally Posted by meglosmurmurs:
“I think if someone went up to Lord Sugar and said 'So you have to have a female winner this series don't you?' he'd probably give them a scathing look and bark 'Don't be so ridiculous'.
I don't think he'd let anyone think he bases his decisions on trivial things like that.
Plus, as has been mentioned, the last 2 winners of Young Apprentice were female so I bet he feels satisfied that he's not neglecting the females.”
Originally Posted by george.millman:
“In fact in the last series, three out of the final four Young candidates were girls.”
I think you will also find that the females in YA overall have been better than the females in the regular Apprentice.
IMO too many of the females see the show more as a route into z-list celebdom than serious opprtunities in business. Yes there are some guys that do as well but not so much as the women.
The bitchiness seems to increase with every series and the females seem to be more ridicuous with their own self-belief of how good they actually are. A lot of the guys are bad, but many of the women are worse.
It never surprises me when you see the women getting picked off quite easily because most aren't up to the job IMO. I think it was Karen Brady that said about the contestants (both genders) that they are so used to being in charge they aren't used to being part of a team and working as a team.
This seems really true with the women. Every series you get little cliques very quickly and that leads to internal squabling, bitching and general failures.
In the way that some guys try to be the Alpha Male or the Top Dog, the women have a similar thing and they let it mess things up for them.