Originally Posted by jonner101:
“Development time like any other time is money...”
Thank you for pointing out the obvious.
Only problem is, you go on to completely blow this tired old argument out the water when you say:
Originally Posted by jonner101:
“At the same time there are some really innovative apps available for Android which some independents have written just for the heck of it. You don't tend to see these type of apps so much on iOS”
Given the amazing number of one-man development teams producing apps and ROMs for Android on no budget and in their spare time, the idea that an organisation with a proper development team and a reasonable budget can't develop decent apps for Android because it costs too much is pretty pitiful.
Originally Posted by jonner101:
“I hate this sense of entitlement that some people seem to have on what should be available.”
Damned right there's a sense of entitlement.
Android has more than twice the marketshare of iOS in the UK, that means around twice as many licence fee payers use Android handsets as iPhones, yet the BBC prioritises development of the iOS app.
Same goes for a number of other companies whose paying customers get the short end of the stick for choosing a handset that isn't an iPhone or a tablet that isn't an iPad.
Originally Posted by jonner101:
“It's well known that iOS users are far more likely to purchase and not pirate the app...”
Originally Posted by psionic:
“Also iOS development is generally more profitable. So that tends to be the focus.”
The Google Play Store's revenue is increasing all the time.
And who's to say that the iOS App Store would be more profitable is Android wasn't treated as a second-class OS by developers? If developers want to make money from Android, they need to start by offering quality apps.