|
||||||||
Was Series 3 The Best? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Quote:
That's not Series 4's counterpart of the France task. The France task was a sales task, the Marrakech one was a scavenger hunt.
My issue with Series 9 is that out of sixteen candidates, the only ones that (in my opinion) had the skills and the business ideas to go all the way were Leah, Luisa, Neil and Rebecca. Four out of sixteen really isn't good enough for me. I think that at least half the candidates ought to be strong contenders, if not more. I do not watch The Apprentice to see people fail. I think you're wrong on Series 9... Neil didn't have a credible business plan in LS's eyes, and so if you're including him, you should include Jordan also, on the basis that he may not have had a good plan, but was a credible candidate. I also feel that Alex and Myles were strong candidates. And like it or not, most people watch the Apprentice for the candidates' incompetence, and I know that that shouldn't be the case but it is, and that's the image the producers have tried to convey in every series apart from Series 1, with the editing: just listen to the music, and the way things are edited. If they were trying to highlight a good business message, instead of firing someone each episode, and LS pointing out as many flaws as he possibly can in the losing team's strategy, they wouldd get the winning team in, and study why that team did so well and won the task. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 327
|
Series 3 was my favourite so far as well, with the unforgettable Tre.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I think you're wrong on Series 9... Neil didn't have a credible business plan in LS's eyes, and so if you're including him, you should include Jordan also, on the basis that he may not have had a good plan, but was a credible candidate. I also feel that Alex and Myles were strong candidates.
Quote:
And like it or not, most people watch the Apprentice for the candidates' incompetence, and I know that that shouldn't be the case but it is, and that's the image the producers have tried to convey in every series apart from Series 1, with the editing: just listen to the music, and the way things are edited. If they were trying to highlight a good business message, instead of firing someone each episode, and LS pointing out as many flaws as he possibly can in the losing team's strategy, they wouldd get the winning team in, and study why that team did so well and won the task.
That is pretty much explained in the descriptions of the show. The candidates are still referred to as the 'entrepreneurial elite' and such things in the commentary by the narrator, and it's described as a very difficult process. To me, that says it all. It's not the candidates who are rubbish, it's the process that is exceptionally difficult, and no one is going to do an incredible job on the tasks because they are impossible to do well at by definition. The contest though is about seeing how they are handled, and envisioning those candidates in an actual situation, and thinking, 'Can they be impressive?' It's very easy to think it's all about incompetent candidates, but that's not what the programme is about, otherwise they'd get the same kind of sample of candidates that you get on Big Brother (I say that with some degree of humility as I have auditioned for Big Brother and did quite well, but then again you wouldn't see me going on The Apprentice either). |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Quote:
I don't think Neil's business plan was poor in itself. The problem with it was that it had flaws, which Neil was too proud to acknowledge. Lord Sugar had time for it and was absolutely willing to work through the issues with Neil, but Neil was so convinced that it was perfect the way it was that Lord Sugar had no choice but to turn it down. Jordan's plan was different, because it wasn't even his business and he wasn't playing by the rules, so there was no way he could ever have won.
I disagree. That has come up in lots of interviews with Lord Sugar, and he said that if they really thought the candidates were incompetent, they should come to auditions and see the calibre of the people who are turned down. There are people with crazy hair and jewellery and things who are clearly just in it to make a name for themselves. The candidates are obviously picked partly on an entertainment level, but the vast majority of them have had some success in business before appearing on the show, and I think that most of the time the mistakes that are made are more as a result of the format (the technicalities of the tasks such as having to do something that would normally take weeks in two days, and the immensely high levels of stress) than of the ineptitude of the candidates. Of course those things are included in the edits because they're fun to chortle at, but that isn't what the show is about. The show is about finding someone who is really decent to go into business with Lord Sugar (or, previously, to get a job with him). That is pretty much explained in the descriptions of the show. The candidates are still referred to as the 'entrepreneurial elite' and such things in the commentary by the narrator, and it's described as a very difficult process. To me, that says it all. It's not the candidates who are rubbish, it's the process that is exceptionally difficult, and no one is going to do an incredible job on the tasks because they are impossible to do well at by definition. The contest though is about seeing how they are handled, and envisioning those candidates in an actual situation, and thinking, 'Can they be impressive?' It's very easy to think it's all about incompetent candidates, but that's not what the programme is about, otherwise they'd get the same kind of sample of candidates that you get on Big Brother (I say that with some degree of humility as I have auditioned for Big Brother and did quite well, but then again you wouldn't see me going on The Apprentice either). ![]() And of course they're all good business people, but the ones with big/different personalities are picked, and as yyou say, the process is exceptionally difficult, and so the candidates fail in some areas, and these failures are always magnified by the producers, but of course they try to get a good balance, which they normally acheive, and that's the way I like it. I still think Series 9's standard is higher than you make it out to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Obviously Sugar would want it to be abiout competence, because he's the one who has to invest in them!
![]() And of course they're all good business people, but the ones with big/different personalities are picked, and as yyou say, the process is exceptionally difficult, and so the candidates fail in some areas, and these failures are always magnified by the producers, but of course they try to get a good balance, which they normally acheive, and that's the way I like it. I still think Series 9's standard is higher than you make it out to be ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
I feel there are so many components to a good series... I summarised them in another thread, and I'll do it again, with bulletpoints:
* Candidates: There has to be some competent ones (some of whom go on journeys, some of whom start of well, but tail off, and some of whom are consistent throughout), there has to be ones with big personalities, and we have to see strong, coherenent interactions between characters, which are shown and developed throughout the series (Lucinda vs Helene for example), and there has to be some likeable, some unlikeable. It is also best if it's a diverse bunch. * Tasks: There has to be a good range of tasks, which are fun to watch, testing a variety of skills, and if there's ones which are a bit different liek the away-day one then that's even better. * Competence: There has to be a theme of business nouse throughout the series, with moments of genius. * Incompetence: There has to be those moments where people bomb, and you're thinking 'how can you be doing that?!' * Memorable moments: There has to be things that stick in your mind, like massive arguments, terrible TV ads, funny quotes etc... * Spontaneity: If there is no spontaniety, we always know what's coming next, and it gets boring. When things like LS calling Jason back in to congratulate him, it keeps you guessing as to what happens next. And, alll of this has to run through the series! It might sound like a tough thing to fulfil, but most of the series have ticked all these boxes, even in small amounts... The only one I can think of which doesn't fulfil some of these criteria is Series 8... |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I feel there are so many components to a good series... I summarised them in another thread, and I'll do it again, with bulletpoints:
* Candidates: There has to be some competent ones (some of whom go on journeys, some of whom start of well, but tail off, and some of whom are consistent throughout), there has to be ones with big personalities, and we have to see strong, coherenent interactions between characters, which are shown and developed throughout the series (Lucinda vs Helene for example), and there has to be some likeable, some unlikeable. It is also best if it's a diverse bunch. * Tasks: There has to be a good range of tasks, which are fun to watch, testing a variety of skills, and if there's ones which are a bit different liek the away-day one then that's even better. * Competence: There has to be a theme of business nouse throughout the series, with moments of genius. * Incompetence: There has to be those moments where people bomb, and you're thinking 'how can you be doing that?!' * Memorable moments: There has to be things that stick in your mind, like massive arguments, terrible TV ads, funny quotes etc... * Spontaneity: If there is no spontaniety, we always know what's coming next, and it gets boring. When things like LS calling Jason back in to congratulate him, it keeps you guessing as to what happens next. And, alll of this has to run through the series! It might sound like a tough thing to fulfil, but most of the series have ticked all these boxes, even in small amounts... The only one I can think of which doesn't fulfil some of these criteria is Series 8... I also think that it's important not to view competent and entertaining as being mutually exclusive. Of course it's important that the programme is watchable enough for the viewers to enjoy, but at the same time there are so many people over the years (Saira, Katie Hopkins, James McQuillan, Zoe Plummer, Luisa and loads of others) who have been really entertaining, and also very capable performers. I think that capable performers ought to be the priority, but it is so possible to do that and also have a suitable variety of candidates for the viewing public. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 180
|
I think that producers do focus on the silly moments and sometimes criticisms from Nick and Karen are too harsh. However, sometimes the performance could not be described as clever in any way like the corporate away task in Season 9 where each team showed little creativity or common sense. I got the sense that candidates like Francesca and Jason were desperately out of depth to be on the program using Season 9 as an example and I wonder how they get through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I think that producers do focus on the silly moments and sometimes criticisms from Nick and Karen are too harsh. However, sometimes the performance could not be described as clever in any way like the corporate away task in Season 9 where each team showed little creativity or common sense. I got the sense that candidates like Francesca and Jason were desperately out of depth to be on the program using Season 9 as an example and I wonder how they get through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 180
|
I agree with that. It was blown out of context when it was just not worded very eloquently. She definitely did not like Suzie and in season 9 for example, I think she really disliked Jordan. You can sense from how she is more critical of specific people than others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I agree with that. It was blown out of context when it was just not worded very eloquently. She definitely did not like Suzie and in season 9 for example, I think she really disliked Jordan. You can sense from how she is more critical of specific people than others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Quote:
I never understood why Karren was so harsh about Susan Ma's 'Are the French very fond of their children?' query. It was only in a brainstorm, and it was obvious that she was actually questioning whether they are inclined to impulsively buy things for their children (different cultures bring up their children differently) as opposed to questioning whether they love them generally, and in my opinion that was a very sensible thing to be asking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Well it sounded ignorant, so I can understand why Karren was bewildered, but yes, she was overly harsh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Quote:
I didn't think it sounded ignorant. There are various schools of thought regarding how to bring children up, and some cultures don't really buy things for their children at all, aside from practical and necessary things. Susan didn't know that much about French culture, so naturally that was something that she wanted to know. It's the same with 'Do the French drive?' She obviously wasn't suggesting that there was not a single person in France who drove a car, but there is more traffic in some countries than in others. For example, I would never choose something involving cars to sell in Denmark - of course there are people there who drive, but generally it is a nation that does a lot of travelling by bike, and also they have a very cheap and efficient public transport service, so for that nation it would be a poor choice. That's the sort of thing Susan was trying to find out. She wasn't wording it perfectly, but it was a brainstorm and everyone knew what she meant. I don't know why Karren made a point about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Regarding there being various of schools of thought about bringing up children, that's not what she said... All she said was 'are the French very fond of their chipdren', which in my opinion does sound ignorant, as does 'do the French drive'. As Karren said, you really don't need to he an expert on France to know that cars are widely used in France. That may not have been exactly what she meant, but that is what she said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
It still sounded ignorant. I'm not sure how you can argue against that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
It still sounded ignorant. I'm not sure how you can argue against that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
I disagree, but this is just going round in circles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I disagree, but this is just going round in circles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
It was reasonable to an extent yes,
And I don't think what Susan said was [i]that[I/] clear. She said what she said. It's really an opinion thing anyway, so there's no real point in discussing it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
It was reasonable to an extent yes,
And I don't think what Susan said was [i]that[I/] clear. She said what she said. It's really an opinion thing anyway, so there's no real point in discussing it. If you're going to go by the notion that there is no point discussing personal opinions, that entirely negates the point of this forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
It was reasonable to an extent yes,
And I don't think what Susan said was [i]that[I/] clear. She said what she said. It's really an opinion thing anyway, so there's no real point in discussing it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
I just watched Series 9 Episode 11, and Neil's business plan wasn't just a little bit flawed, the fundamental concept was flawed, and was unworkable.
It was basically just a website, which allowed people to sell their own homes. Selling your own home is a lot of hassle, especially having to do the viewings yourself. That was a flaw in itself. The way he would make money would be to have estate agents advertise their properties on Neil's website - why would they do that?! The whole thing didn't work. So George, in that list you have of the four Series 9 credible candidates, if you're going to include Neil, you should include Jordan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
I just watched Series 9 Episode 11, and Neil's business plan wasn't just a little bit flawed, the fundamental concept was flawed, and was unworkable.
It was basically just a website, which allowed people to sell their own homes. Selling your own home is a lot of hassle, especially having to do the viewings yourself. That was a flaw in itself. The way he would make money would be to have estate agents advertise their properties on Neil's website - why would they do that?! The whole thing didn't work. So George, in that list you have of the four Series 9 credible candidates, if you're going to include Neil, you should include Jordan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
The interviewers certainly asked him about a Plan B on numerous occasions, but he refused to change.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43.




