Originally Posted by george.millman:
“Is the USA edition any good, Jack? Would be interesting to hear your opinion on it. At one point I tried to get into it, but I didn't find it very enjoyable. When someone thought it would be a great idea to charge £1,000 for a glass of lemonade, I decided it wasn't for me. Also, from what I've heard, I don't think I'd respect Trump in the way I respect Lord Sugar.
I've found it hard to get into any of the international ones actually, the only one that has spoken to me was The Apprentice Australia with Mark Bouris, which I don't believe is currently available online.”
Oh, you will not respect Trump the same way you respect Sugar, I guarantee it. His decisions are largely OK in Season 1, but he makes some utterly ridiculous ones in Seasons 2 and 3. He's nowhere as fair as Sugar; he isn't as smart and he feels the need to play himself up in every episode (There's a Trump business lesson in every episode which usually relates to the success or failure of the task, which is a deliberate attempt to make him seem all-knowing) and the self-promotion can grate a bit. There is tons of product placement as well. Whilst the UK version very rarely mentions company names, Trump will base entire tasks around companies (So you have to create a bottle for Pepsi or create an advertisement for Sony)
He randomly makes crazy decisions, like in one episode, he fires a candidate for winking at him, whilst in another, he fires another candidate for speaking at the wrong time. In the second episode of Season 2, he fires someone for reasons completely unrelated to the task; they just seem ridiculous.
In the later series, twists are introduced for no real reason (Immunity for the winning PM, teams split into College Grads vs High School Grads, Teams split by random selection at the start etc) and around Series 4, Trump starts making certain crazy decisions to (IMO) try and improve ratings (There are two double firings and a quadruple firing in Series 4, so if you didn't like them in this series, you won't like them in the US version!). There are 18 candidates in Series 2 onwards, so if you struggled with the 20 in this series, it'll be difficult for you in the US one, especially Season 3 which doesn't even start with gender teams.
The one thing I don't think you'll like is it's a lot more dramatic and grandstanding - there's a lot more flashy stuff (Just look at Trump Tower's extravagance compared to the simplistic boardroom in the UK version) The boardroom always has dramatic music playing during it, candidates will often be more loud and outspoken in general. Overall, the standard of candidates is better in the UK version, imo, BUT there are a few candidates in the US version that are utterly outstanding and could compete with the top UK candidates, but they are very few and far between. For example, in Season 1, the Top 5 were all fantastic, imo, but virtually all the rest felt like they were deadwood or there for ratings. My favourite ever candidate (From any version anywhere) is in Season 3 of the US version.
This all makes it sound like I think its rubbish. I don't think that; in fact Season 1 is very, very good (And I personally like Season 3), but I don't think that you'd be able to get through all of the seasons for example. It got very stale quite quickly.
If I were you, I'd give Season 1 a go, because it is a very good season of television and its the closest to the UK format (16 candidates, no stupid twists, two cut at interviews etc) Not only that, but the standard is very very high when it gets to the end and its fun seeing certain candidates succeed. What I would say is if you get through to about ep 6 and decide it isn't for you, then fair enough, but I would give it a go.
EDIT: One thing I forgot to say is that I LOVE his Nick & Margaret (Called George and Carolyn). Both are very likeable, very intelligent and astute and are quite fair on the candidates. I think one of the flaws in the later series is that he doesn't listen to them enough in comparison to earlier.