1 = not dull, 10 = dull dull dull
10!
10!
On a scale of 1-10, how dull would the house be without Gina?
1 of 2
I'd find it less dull without her. I'm not entertained by her rows or by anything else she's done so far.
We'd still have Sallie so it wouldn't be THAT dull, but she surely would be missed and she should definitely stay
Sallie would still be in the house. Plus it would just put some one else at the forefront camera wise.
Originally Posted by BabelBrook:
“What has Gina contributed apart from two arguments?”
“What has Gina contributed apart from two arguments?”
Arguments are big talking points. So more than most of them. A lot more than the insufferable twins.
The show is called Big Brother not Big Argument.
She would not be missed unless he starts bringing something more to the table.
She would not be missed unless he starts bringing something more to the table.
10!!!
The show has only been on a few days - she has played a massive part in what has been the best first week in BB history.
Imagine what she can bring in future weeks ..
The show has only been on a few days - she has played a massive part in what has been the best first week in BB history.
Imagine what she can bring in future weeks ..
Gina is not interesting at all..or entertaining..or particularly good looking. She is generally offensive..a wannabe nouveau-riche trollop..and an ignoramus.
So not a great loss in my view..answer: no duller than before.
So not a great loss in my view..answer: no duller than before.
It's hard to know. She is pretty dull herself, but she and the equally dull Sallie are monopolizing the airtime, so we have no idea how dull or otherwise the other HMs might be. Is there anyone in there with a sense of humour? Anyone at all?
Originally Posted by BabelBrook:
“What has Gina contributed apart from two arguments?”
“What has Gina contributed apart from two arguments?”
Half of a very tedious dinner with Michael?
1
gina doesn't contribute to the house
she's mildly entertaining as an example of a wealthy stuck up bitch made slightly more exotic because, unstereotypically, she's black
(or on my tv a strange shade of yellowy brown with red splodges - facially that is)
gina doesn't contribute to the house
she's mildly entertaining as an example of a wealthy stuck up bitch made slightly more exotic because, unstereotypically, she's black
(or on my tv a strange shade of yellowy brown with red splodges - facially that is)
Why do people think the series would be dull without her? What is so entertaining about Gina? All she has contributed so far are petty arguments based on utterly shallow things. It might be good for a couple of nights but surely nobody wants an entire series of that? Surely? Gina and Sallie are typical camera hoggers. The other housemates are perceived to be 'dull' because people like that scream the loudest. As they say, empty vessels make the most noise... Gina is actually a very boring person, as evidenced by her monosyllabic answers in the diary room and tedious conversations with other housemates.
She a one-trick pony.... start a pointless argument and use to gain attention/sympathy.
do you really want 10 weeks of it....
do you really want 10 weeks of it....
1 of 2
