What is the point of asking people to nominate their least favourite, then evict their least favourite?

It should have been vote to save for nominations - ensuring three dullards are nominated. Then vote to evict between those three if vote to evict is to be retained.

Two negative votes, two positive votes, a positive and a negative vote - you're still a sucker for being duped into voting twice in a week for the same thing.

It does seem silly.

Since they waited until the nomination results to announce it would be a vote to evict I take it they are happy with whoever got the most votes and wouldn't mind seeing them evicted.
I suppose with Gina pulling the racism card maybe getting rid of her is preferred by the producers.
If the nomination twist was more interesting, or at least made sense, I may have voted this week, but now I'm not bothering.

If it's vote to evict all series then the results are going to be more predictable, so I can see myself not voting at all.

its all gone crazy.

they are also freezing the voting lines on Wednesday at midday ?!? just what is the agenda here

I think it's interesting that, if they can assume the sample is reliable, they already know who will receive the least votes and be declared safe, and they probably know who's going to be evicted

just when you thought it couldnt get any more farcical last last years debacle....

perhaps they will invite conor back and give him another 50 grand for good measure