things like this really irratate me.
why didnt they discuss the gina vs jemima incident on bots last night
Originally Posted by gentleguy:
“things like this really irratate me.”
“things like this really irratate me.”
They asked the audience if it was the right thing to do...A few of the audience said no & that was it..
It's a bit to highbrow and complicated for idiots like rylan and aj and the audience to comprehend or actually have an opinion on
Originally Posted by gentleguy:
“things like this really irratate me.”
“things like this really irratate me.”
Why should they need to, its a non issue and it was dealt with.
Originally Posted by SpiderMan 83:
“Why should they need to, its a non issue and it was dealt with.”
“Why should they need to, its a non issue and it was dealt with.”
because it happenned on bb and they are supposed to discuss what happens imo.
You asked the same question last night, and it was baffling then. Why would they want to? It was a negative incident with no particular ramifications as far as we can see. There have been loads of warnings in the past that haven't taken up much time on spin off shows. Do you expect BBOTS to do a minute by minute reprise of what we have all just watched immediately before? What on earth would be the point?There seems to be some reason why you really, really want THAT incident discussed, and not all the other possible incidents. I am not sure what you are hoping for; my guess is that you would have liked to see the BBOTS audience shouting "PC gone mad! Broken Britain! Can't say anything these days!" - correct me if I'm wrong. If I'm right, it is obviously regrettable that BBOTS was not turned for the night into a comments page from the Daily Mail, but they possibly preferred to try and produce an entertaining programme.
Originally Posted by gentleguy:
“because it happenned on bb and they are supposed to discuss what happens imo.”
“because it happenned on bb and they are supposed to discuss what happens imo.”
So what alot of other things did too. Maybe just maybe they wanted to focus on the other House mates not just this. and the last thing talked about on BB was noms that was more important.
This thing was a non issue and you keep going on about it won't change that. Its like you want approval from them to say BB were wrong.
Not sure why you see it as a big thing when so many others don't.
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“ You asked the same question last night, and it was baffling then. Why would they want to? It was a negative incident with no particular ramifications as far as we can see. There have been loads of warnings in the past that haven't taken up much time on spin off shows. Do you expect BBOTS to do a minute by minute reprise of what we have all just watched immediately before? What on earth would be the point?
There seems to be some reason why you really, really want THAT incident discussed, and not all the other possible incidents. I am not sure what you are hoping for; my guess is that you would have liked to see the BBOTS audience shouting "PC gone mad! Broken Britain! Can't say anything these days!" - correct me if I'm wrong. If I'm right, it is obviously regrettable that BBOTS was not turned for the night into a comments page from the Daily Mail, but they possibly preferred to try and produce an entertaining programme.”
“
You asked the same question last night, and it was baffling then. Why would they want to? It was a negative incident with no particular ramifications as far as we can see. There have been loads of warnings in the past that haven't taken up much time on spin off shows. Do you expect BBOTS to do a minute by minute reprise of what we have all just watched immediately before? What on earth would be the point?There seems to be some reason why you really, really want THAT incident discussed, and not all the other possible incidents. I am not sure what you are hoping for; my guess is that you would have liked to see the BBOTS audience shouting "PC gone mad! Broken Britain! Can't say anything these days!" - correct me if I'm wrong. If I'm right, it is obviously regrettable that BBOTS was not turned for the night into a comments page from the Daily Mail, but they possibly preferred to try and produce an entertaining programme.”
Spot on, The FM seems to be Obsessed.
BBOTS is better when it's a lighthearted fun show. It can't cover a serious subject like racism properly without appearing to trivialise it, so why even bother. People can discuss it on here if they wish, why the need to hear other people going on about it on BBOTS too ?
BBLB was a lighthearted show too but during the race row they interviewed jade as it was a massive story and they would of been silly not too. Can you imagine if something liked that happend now? Thank god channel 4 had someone like Dermott presenting then who actually had the mental capacity and interviewing skills to deal with it.
For the record I think this gina thing is a non issue and bb was worng but why couldnt it of been debated? and i jjust hate that they have two thick idiots presenting bots when they could have someone like Iain lee who can actually string a sentence together and read an auto cue and is also alot funnier than both.
For the record I think this gina thing is a non issue and bb was worng but why couldnt it of been debated? and i jjust hate that they have two thick idiots presenting bots when they could have someone like Iain lee who can actually string a sentence together and read an auto cue and is also alot funnier than both.
Originally Posted by Lewi26:
“BBLB was a lighthearted show too but during the race row they interviewed jade as it was a massive story and they would of been silly not too. Can you imagine if something liked that happend now? Thank god channel 4 had someone like Dermott presenting then who actually had the mental capacity and interviewing skills to deal with it.
For the record I think this gina thing is a non issue and bb was worng but why couldnt it of been debated? and i jjust hate that they have two thick idiots presenting bots when they could have someone like Iain lee who can actually string a sentence together and read an auto cue and is also alot funnier than both.”
“BBLB was a lighthearted show too but during the race row they interviewed jade as it was a massive story and they would of been silly not too. Can you imagine if something liked that happend now? Thank god channel 4 had someone like Dermott presenting then who actually had the mental capacity and interviewing skills to deal with it.
For the record I think this gina thing is a non issue and bb was worng but why couldnt it of been debated? and i jjust hate that they have two thick idiots presenting bots when they could have someone like Iain lee who can actually string a sentence together and read an auto cue and is also alot funnier than both.”
Indeed a massive story which was making international headlines, with the British flag being burned on the streets of India. It was also the case that BB weren't seen to be taking action to prevent Shilpa from being racially harassed by Jade.
Whether you agree with the warning which Jemima received or not, BB took decisive action and it's probably case-closed now as far as they are concerned.
It's the official companion show, they should discuss big house events, which this was. Perhaps they would have if it wasn't nominations night, that was the main point of discussion.
Originally Posted by Lewi26:
“BBLB was a lighthearted show too but during the race row they interviewed jade as it was a massive story and they would of been silly not too. Can you imagine if something liked that happend now? Thank god channel 4 had someone like Dermott presenting then who actually had the mental capacity and interviewing skills to deal with it.
For the record I think this gina thing is a non issue and bb was worng but why couldnt it of been debated? and i jjust hate that they have two thick idiots presenting bots when they could have someone like Iain lee who can actually string a sentence together and read an auto cue and is also alot funnier than both.”
“BBLB was a lighthearted show too but during the race row they interviewed jade as it was a massive story and they would of been silly not too. Can you imagine if something liked that happend now? Thank god channel 4 had someone like Dermott presenting then who actually had the mental capacity and interviewing skills to deal with it.
For the record I think this gina thing is a non issue and bb was worng but why couldnt it of been debated? and i jjust hate that they have two thick idiots presenting bots when they could have someone like Iain lee who can actually string a sentence together and read an auto cue and is also alot funnier than both.”
I agree, Lewi. It was the main talking point last night - they only have to look at the comments on their own website to see that 99% of viewers were furious about their stupid, OTT PC reaction. Of course they should at least have tried to justify themselves, but no - they just treat us all like idiots and gloss over it as usual.
It was just the same last year with Conor - we were all incandescent with rage about him, and they kept pretending on BOTS that he was some sort of 'character' and just glossed over all our more than justified complaints.
Originally Posted by Oldnjaded:
“I agree, Lewi. It was the main talking point last night - they only have to look at the comments on their own website to see that 99% of viewers were furious about their stupid, OTT PC reaction. Of course they should at least have tried to justify themselves, but no - they just treat us all like idiots and gloss over it as usual.
It was just the same last year with Conor - we were all incandescent with rage about him, and they kept pretending on BOTS that he was some sort of 'character' and just glossed over all our more than justified complaints.”
“I agree, Lewi. It was the main talking point last night - they only have to look at the comments on their own website to see that 99% of viewers were furious about their stupid, OTT PC reaction. Of course they should at least have tried to justify themselves, but no - they just treat us all like idiots and gloss over it as usual.
It was just the same last year with Conor - we were all incandescent with rage about him, and they kept pretending on BOTS that he was some sort of 'character' and just glossed over all our more than justified complaints.
”
Conor would have been lambasted on here if had told Deana he wouldn't date Indian women.
Originally Posted by WeeJintyMcGinty:
“Conor would have been lambasted on here if had told Deana he wouldn't date Indian women.”
“Conor would have been lambasted on here if had told Deana he wouldn't date Indian women.”
Deana made a controversial comment about all men being unfaithful and cheats but she wasn't reprimanded for that although it could potentially offend men in general I suppose
It offended Luke A I remember
