|
||||||||
Myles in his Pants...! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,299
|
Myles in his Pants...!
That's really all I have to say!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
I was a bit happier seeing Neil with his top off again
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,291
|
sadly....it was only from the side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,444
|
Why is it every week without fail, we see the male contestants in their underwear but not the female?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Why is it every week without fail, we see the male contestants in their underwear but not the female?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
George summed it up perfectly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,444
|
I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
George summed it up perfectly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Home Counties North
Posts: 3,336
|
Quote:
That's really all I have to say!
Frankly there was absolutely no need for a serious minded show to display to us that scene. It made me feel nauseous. As for the charge of sexism if hey showed the girls I suspect it might be more to do with the girls refusing to have cameras follow them around the house scantily clad. Whereas I can well imagine the lads ego would allow them to say to the cameramen - bring it on. It wasn't good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
Yes...of course that would be the case. Pure ego
Sigh |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,171
|
Quote:
It's safer to show male contestants in their underwear. If they showed female contestants in their underwear, there would be complaints about sexism, and only having women on the show as eye candy etc. I know it's a complete double standard if it's okay to show men in their underwear (especially when there doesn't seem to be any problem with women fawning over people like Myles and Jason); it's another form of sexism, but one that the world accepts for some reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Couldnt you say its only sexist because women in underwear are sexualised to such an extent in the majority of the mass media in a way that men in underwear arent, in the majority of cases, maybe? I'm probably getting cases mixed up, its late haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
Its totally sexist to depict either gender as 'sex objects'. The men are in their pants, the women are shown fully clothed drying their hair. The standards - they are a double.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,374
|
Quote:
Its totally sexist to depict either gender as 'sex objects'. The men are in their pants, the women are shown fully clothed drying their hair. The standards - they are a double.
Oh my god Myles...put him in a steamy jail cell - that's where he belongs... ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 170
|
He doesn't care because he has a six pack, if he had beerbelly I am not sure how comfortable he'd be to appear on bbc1 in underwear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,374
|
Quote:
He doesn't care because he has a six pack, if he had beerbelly I am not sure how comfortable he'd be to appear on bbc1 in underwear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,299
|
Quote:
Has it taken you two days to recover from the shock before posting that?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43.


