• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Alex now holds a new record...
george.millman
20-06-2013
Alex at this point holds the record for the longest anyone has survived into the process without being a Project Manager. Previously the record was held by Tom Pellereau, who had his first (and only) PM stint in Week 8.

I don't know why Lord Sugar didn't make Alex PM this week actually. He doesn't always do it when there is only one person left - he didn't do it last year with Jade, for example - but I would have thought that as Alex wasn't PM last week, Lord Sugar would have appointed him this week. Does anyone know about next week?
Malik24
20-06-2013
He is PM next week. Whether he is appointed by Sugar is as yet unknown.

He hasn't strongarmed PMs much this series, interestingly enough.
TXF0429
20-06-2013
Originally Posted by Malik24:
“He is PM next week. Whether he is appointed by Sugar is as yet unknown.

He hasn't strongarmed PMs much this series, interestingly enough.”

Only Francesca and Leah in Week 6, iirc.

But yeah, I'd be very surprised if he wasn't appointed PM next week.To be fair to him, its not as if he's deliberately dodging being the PM. He's volunteered to be the PM three times, but just hasn't been elected in.
Malik24
20-06-2013
Originally Posted by TXF0429:
“Only Francesca and Leah in Week 6, iirc.

But yeah, I'd be very surprised if he wasn't appointed PM next week.To be fair to him, its not as if he's deliberately dodging being the PM. He's volunteered to be the PM three times, but just hasn't been elected in.”

Tim Stillwell and Kurt too for the Beer task, IIRC. So, maybe not as rare as I thought... but still probably rarer than the average.
george.millman
20-06-2013
In Series 1, he only chose the PMs once - that was with Matthew and Adele in Week 3.

It's interesting that in this series he chose the PMs so early on. He's only done it as early as Week 2 once in the past, and that was with Stella.
TXF0429
20-06-2013
Originally Posted by george.millman:
“In Series 1, he only chose the PMs once - that was with Matthew and Adele in Week 3.

It's interesting that in this series he chose the PMs so early on. He's only done it as early as Week 2 once in the past, and that was with Stella.”

Was Stella ever officially appointed? All he did was send Stella to Synergy and said whip those boys into shape. He never said (that was aired) that she had to do it.

In Series 4 he appointed PMs 6 times!

Week 3: Ian and Sara
Week 5: Claire and Lucinda
Week 6: Kevin and Michael
Week 7: Jennifer and Lee
Week 9: Alex and Raef
Week 10: Michael and Lee
george.millman
20-06-2013
Originally Posted by TXF0429:
“Was Stella ever officially appointed? All he did was send Stella to Synergy and said whip those boys into shape. He never said (that was aired) that she had to do it.”

Yes, I thought that. It wasn't explicitly said (that we saw) that she had to do it, he just said that she'd whip them into shape (or something along those lines). However, the way that she just appeared to be PM straight away with no discussion suggests that he meant she had to lead the team.
Jamesthethird
20-06-2013
Originally Posted by TXF0429:
“Only Francesca and Leah in Week 6, iirc.

But yeah, I'd be very surprised if he wasn't appointed PM next week.To be fair to him, its not as if he's deliberately dodging being the PM. He's volunteered to be the PM three times, but just hasn't been elected in.”

It genuinely looked to me that they deliberately voted Jordan pm because they knew Alex hadn't done it before and it would make it seam like he was either hiding or nobody trusted him.

That said, I really don't like Alex.
Purple.
20-06-2013
I thought it was strange that they voted for Jordan this week because usually they automatically vote for the one who hasn't done it yet I think.
Monkseal
20-06-2013
At the start of the episode Myles joked with Alex that he'd probably put himself up for PM and get voted down again. I think there's definitely tactics going on to some degree to crowd Alex out of the role and make him look weak.
TheAuburnEnigma
20-06-2013
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“At the start of the episode Myles joked with Alex that he'd probably put himself up for PM and get voted down again. I think there's definitely tactics going on to some degree to crowd Alex out of the role and make him look weak.”

I think part of it is his age - at 22, wasn't he the youngest candidate out of everyone (possible exception of Sophie) ?

Either that, or some of the others see him as a possible threat and so want to undermine him in front of LS, but not do it explicitly, if that makes sense.
Monkseal
20-06-2013
I don't know if it's his age - Tim was 23 and elected PM fairly handily, and 25 year old Luisa was elected unanimously over 35 year old Rebecca.

I do think he might have been playing the "I'll wait as long as possible to be PM" tactic that other winners have used (Simon and Lee both said they did this very deliberately in their series, I think Michelle might have interviewed to the same effect as well, and let's face it, Tom was blatantly doing it) and some of the others have picked up a way to counter-play it.
Shrike
20-06-2013
Its actually quite logical to go for a proven PM rather than an unknown - after all if Jordan gets them the win, they are stuffing caviar down their gullets whilst unknown Alex might get them the risk of being fired.
george.millman
20-06-2013
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“I don't know if it's his age - Tim was 23 and elected PM fairly handily, and 25 year old Luisa was elected unanimously over 35 year old Rebecca.”

Tim was elected by Lord Sugar, so he doesn't count.
Philip Wales
21-06-2013
Plus I assume it's easier to win as PM when there are so few left, by then you know their strengths and weaknesses and you don't get so much bickering, by this stage everyones "in it to win it"
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map