• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Has BB14 got most of these things RIGHT?
YesNoMan
25-06-2013
1) First week mole, for one week only.

2) Three "up for nomination" (it's now fully entered the lexicon like it or not) each week.

3) Vote to evict, coupled crucially with point 2)

4) Noms on Sunday, shown on Monday highlights immediately followed by the results delivered live.

5) Vegetable garden / Mangle


Any more for any more?
DUNDEEBOY
25-06-2013
No
No when it's vote to evict a dull one will be safe each week
No
Yes
Don't care
Fanntastik
25-06-2013
1) Yes
2) Yes
3) No! Should have been vote to save coupled with point 2.
4) Yes but I don't like that it eats away at HLs time. They should extend the show by 5-10 min so they have the same amount of HLs + live results.
5) Don't care about this one.
YesNoMan
25-06-2013
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“No
No when it's vote to evict a dull one will be safe each week
No
Yes
Don't care”

Ah, Mr Positive, we've been expecting you.
cannibalgrandma
25-06-2013
The reason they've gone back to vote to evict, as far as I can see, is for money. The wednesday save takes the one getting the least votes out of the race. If they had done this with vote to save, they'd be taking the person getting the most votes out of the race, meaning less calls/texts.
Cloudy2
25-06-2013
1 was done mostly well, 2 is right, 3 big mistake vote to save should have stayed, 4 is fine although I do miss the leak/spoilers, 5 was fine until Wolfy spat on it tonight.
Arcana
25-06-2013
BB13 is so last year.
wonkeydonkey
25-06-2013
I think they're all good, yes.
YesNoMan
25-06-2013
Originally Posted by Arcana:
“BB13 is so last year.”

Haha, edited.
qwertyell
25-06-2013
Originally Posted by YesNoMan:
“1) First week mole, for one week only.

2) Three "up for nomination" (it's now fully entered the lexicon like it or not) each week.

3) Vote to evict, coupled crucially with point 2)

4) Noms on Sunday, shown on Monday highlights immediately followed by the results delivered live.

5) Vegetable garden / Mangle


Any more for any more?”

1) No. Didn't like it at all. Completely overshadowed the whole week and the natural development of the HMs early interactions.

2) Yes. Minimum of three up should have been a staple as soon as vote to save came in.

3) Absolute nonsense to bring it back - especially having finally "fixed" part 2.

4) Whatever.

5) Again, it's not very important one way or the other.
YesNoMan
25-06-2013
The veg garden brings more outside information for Wolfy,
GetHoppy
25-06-2013
Originally Posted by qwertyell:
“1) No. Didn't like it at all. Completely overshadowed the whole week and the natural development of the HMs early interactions.

2) Yes. Minimum of three up should have been a staple as soon as vote to save came in.

3) Absolute nonsense to bring it back - especially having finally "fixed" part 2.

4) Whatever.

5) Again, it's not very important one way or the other.”

My thoughts exactly.
DODS11
25-06-2013
1. Yes. It served the "Secrets and Lies" theme well and now all of them, especially Dan, are going insane with conspiracy and paranoia. It's much more interesting this way and was probably one of the best launch night twists they've done in a very long time.

2. It's ok. I like that it means we get more live action on a Wednesday and it definitely causes more tension once somebody is in the safe zone - not just among those up for eviction but the housemates who now think said safe person is popular with the public.

3.No. I think vote to save keeps the stronger characters.

4. Yes. I'm not sure on them being told who got how many votes though, I think that will just give the dullards inside knowledge of who's more likely to get nominated and gang up.

5. Self sufficiency has been way overdue! Bring back the Chickens too.
dtorre
25-06-2013
Originally Posted by YesNoMan:
“Ah, Mr Positive, we've been expecting you.”

Was this thread asking for opinions or only ones that agree with you?
YesNoMan
25-06-2013
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“Was this thread asking for opinions or only ones that agree with you?”

Calm down, I think the poster would agree he has had a strong tendency to diss almost every move the producers have ever made. Correct me if I'm wrong DUNDEEBOY.


(Bit of a rubber stamp post by the way. Why bother?)
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map