Last week he had a go at them for listening to the focus group, instead of going with their gut. This week they are getting shit for ignoring the group and going with their gut. **** off Shugs.
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe: “i don't think you could do it. Imagine the legal case when the first kid eats something else with deady and a skull on it........”
So why not more cases against companies selling food that supposed to be healthy but that's full of added sugar? I guess it's OK as long as the packaging looks good.
The task is dumb, these retailers use their own brands for ready meals. The only exceptions are well known brands like Reggae Reggae Jerk, Weight Watchers, etc.
I originally thought that the packaging was rubbish but now I'm just insulted that the supermarkets think that parents are so stupid that they'd be scared to buy the thing for their children.
Originally Posted by WinterFire: “That horrible food in reasonable branding/packaging won over very good food in the wrong packaging. That explains a lot about the food market.”
With Zoe's biscuits and Kate's chocolates of course we got the other argument that it was impossible to improve the taste or cost of the food - this time the idea that it could be changed won.