|
||||||||
The Apprentice Series 9 Episode 9 - Ready Meals' - 9pm on BBC One, 26th June |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#876 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
Quote:
Not necessarily. The vast majority of entrepreneurs set up businesses which they are knowledgeable and/or passionate about . Why should Sugar believe that Alex - who knows nothing about law - should have spotted an opportunity that an enterprising lawyer would not have done? It's possible, yes, but not entirely credible. It would be like me, a 20+ year marketer, suddenly deciding I'm going to run, I dunno, a football academy even though I have two left feet. I know the basics of how to set up the infrastructure, but I just wouldn't be credible.
Alex would have been offering other people's expert advice. Lawyers specialise and don't necessarily market themselves very well. There could well be room for middlemen like Alex to offer a range of legal expertise. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#877 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,168
|
Quote:
I don't think that's true or fair. I don't think that Helen flew under the radar - whenever I saw her, she was working flat out. She was my favourite to win from Week 2, and Lord Sugar said that if the prize had still been a job, she undoubtedly would still have won. Compare her with Myles, who up until this week had only lost one task - his performance hadn't been praised a huge amount, whereas Helen's was. She is also one of only two people so far (the other being Yasmina) who has been Project Manager three times, and won all of them.
Neither Helen nor Tom were solely responsible for winning/ losing the tasks .... It was just good luck for Helen and bad luck for Tom. Winning or losing was a joint effort, and in Helen's 3rd win- it was Toms idea and vision for the My Pye restaurant that swung it for them. Jim's amazing pitch on the biscuit task gave her the win on that one...... Most weeks she was just part of the scenery doing busy work in the background - apart from her PM episodes, the most memorable scene she had was standing mutely behind Zoe as she berated Susan in the beauty task. Tom on the other hand was always seen fully participating in each task - forever writing notes and number crunching. If anything Helen came really unstuck in the final stages as she proved she had no real entrepreneurial skill, her offering was for something already widely available in the market from other better connected and established suppliers. Tom had an idea for something completely new and innovative! |
|
|
|
|
|
#878 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
Most of the Apprentice candidates do this, but this isn't how entrepreneurs work in general. They think outside the box of their own experience and see gaps in the market to exploit. Richard Branson isn't a musician, airline pilot, or rocket scientist but he set up his business empire based on selling other people's music in a new way, then offering travel in a different style. His ideas are all about presenting things differently. Alan Sugar had no experience of anything except market trading, yet he built up a wide portfolio of technology and property companies.
Alex would have been offering other people's expert advice. Lawyers specialise and don't necessarily market themselves very well. There could well be room for middlemen like Alex to offer a range of legal expertise. That's my point with Alex. I'm not saying he couldn't do it - merely that from an investor's point of view he didn't exactly present a credible investment as someone who had jumped from business to business and was now moving into a completely new area. And, as media articles have revealed this week, his record as a small businessman is hardly spotless. His primary business was turning over £28k pa. That's not a business - he wasn't making enough profit to even pay his own salary. |
|
|
|
|
#879 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
Quote:
To go along with this, as a food business person would have guaranteed her firing, had the team lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#880 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
Not sure where to begin with the wrongness of your post but let's start in a point of agreement. Luisa wants to win the competition, we are agreed there, yes? Lets start from there:
If Luisa appeared in the firing line again, she was out. She was in Karen's sights, and Suralan had warned her, She needed to stay out of the boardroom. She was in a team of three. To stay out of the boardroom, her team HAD to win. If her team lost and she was team leader, she h guaranteed her firing, so she had to back off. Neil tried to out her on manufacturing with Francesca. She knows that Neil is ruthless and Francesca is talentless, negative and not a team player. To go along with this, as a food business person would have guaranteed her firing, had the team lost. As her priority was a team win, she worked well with Neil to make sure the concept and marketing were on the money. She contributed ideas and Neil listened. She doesn't give a flying fig about Neil! Her priority was a team win. Much as I have criticised her in the past, all of her excesses have been to the purpose of a team win. Her team won, despite Francesca's negative attitude and near sabotage of the task. Francesca is the luckiest woman in England right now and if I'd been Suralan, i would have wanted to change the rules to sack one of the winning team. It backfired? Luisa's team won, which was largely down to her efforts and was all she wanted or needed to do this week. If they had lost, I would hope that Surlan would have sacked Francesca, as she deserves. Karren noted this all throughout the task. Luisa clearly had sufficient food knowledge to have done a better job than Francesca did in the kitchen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#881 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Most weeks she was just part of the scenery doing busy work in the background - apart from her PM episodes, the most memorable scene she had was standing mutely behind Zoe as she berated Susan in the beauty task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#882 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,063
|
doo doo doo Another One Bites the Dust
|
|
|
|
|
|
#883 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,168
|
Quote:
What about when she did the amazing pitch to the French retailer in Week 8?
as I said most weeks she was doing busy work in the background keeping her head down |
|
|
|
|
|
#884 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 9,275
|
Quote:
Not sure where to begin with the wrongness of your post but let's start in a point of agreement. Luisa wants to win the competition, we are agreed there, yes? Lets start from there:
If Luisa appeared in the firing line again, she was out. She was in Karen's sights, and Suralan had warned her, She needed to stay out of the boardroom. She was in a team of three. To stay out of the boardroom, her team HAD to win. If her team lost and she was team leader, she h guaranteed her firing, so she had to back off. Neil tried to out her on manufacturing with Francesca. She knows that Neil is ruthless and Francesca is talentless, negative and not a team player. To go along with this, as a food business person would have guaranteed her firing, had the team lost. As her priority was a team win, she worked well with Neil to make sure the concept and marketing were on the money. She contributed ideas and Neil listened. She doesn't give a flying fig about Neil! Her priority was a team win. Much as I have criticised her in the past, all of her excesses have been to the purpose of a team win. Her team won, despite Francesca's negative attitude and near sabotage of the task. Francesca is the luckiest woman in England right now and if I'd been Suralan, i would have wanted to change the rules to sack one of the winning team. It backfired? Luisa's team won, which was largely down to her efforts and was all she wanted or needed to do this week. If they had lost, I would hope that Surlan would have sacked Francesca, as she deserves. Luisa played a blinder in this episode, and it's a shame her detractors can't see past the dislike and be more objective. Even Karen who last week had marked her card had to admit that she was seeing a real business person beneath it all. As I always say about the Apprentice, you can always argue these things from more than one angle- I'd wager if she didn't say a word and meekly went and 'hid' in the kitchen because she was the best cook, then the criticism would be she was hiding after last week or keeping her head below the parapet. Damned if you do and damned if you don't! If I was Luisa, there is no way I'd want to be stuck in the kitchen for the exact reasons you gave.The business end of the program is in the pitching, the branding, marketing etc etc, NOT who's better at peeling potatoes/ stir-frying some noodles etc. Tactics and managing where you will be most effective/ less culpable is surely part and parcel of this whole 'interview' process surely? This is the Apprentice, not Masterchef after all! |
|
|
|
|
|
#885 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,646
|
I'm watching on catchup now
Do my eyes deceive me? I am seeing 'deadly dinners' as a name for a ready meal With a big skull icon. in the middle of the label !! Seriously i can't believe what i'm watching right now Luisa (the cooking expert) put's a non-cooking person in the kitchen Hey kids, come get your deadly dinner... it'll just kill you, but don't worry about the skull on the packaging, you'll be fine |
|
|
|
|
#886 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,491
|
Quote:
Most of the Apprentice candidates do this, but this isn't how entrepreneurs work in general. They think outside the box of their own experience and see gaps in the market to exploit. Richard Branson isn't a musician, airline pilot, or rocket scientist but he set up his business empire based on selling other people's music in a new way, then offering travel in a different style. His ideas are all about presenting things differently. Alan Sugar had no experience of anything except market trading, yet he built up a wide portfolio of technology and property companies.
Alex would have been offering other people's expert advice. Lawyers specialise and don't necessarily market themselves very well. There could well be room for middlemen like Alex to offer a range of legal expertise. On the task itself, the wrong team won and Asda need their head examined to have bought anything on the promise the real thing would taste better. Neil, Luisa and Francesca were all ridiculously lucky to get away with that, they were appalling as a team, and they were just incredibly lucky that they were up against a team that would put a skull on food packaging. Miles pitched really badly his own idea, but I did like that he was willing to acknowledge he'd been wrong. We haven't seen much of that this year. It gets on my nerves when the Apprentice suggests that admitting you made a mistake is weak. I think next year they need to rethink the food tasks. There are too many weeks where people are wasting their time cooking badly, as others have said. Got be honest, I wouldn't give anyone still in £250. |
|
|
|
|
|
#887 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
One outstanding moment in a 12 weeks does not "the best candidate ever!" make.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#888 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
An excellent reply to a rather odd post.
Luisa played a blinder in this episode, and it's a shame her detractors can't see past the dislike and be more objective. Even Karen who last week had marked her card had to admit that she was seeing a real business person beneath it all. As I always say about the Apprentice, you can always argue these things from more than one angle- I'd wager if she didn't say a word and meekly went and 'hid' in the kitchen because she was the best cook, then the criticism would be she was hiding after last week or keeping her head below the parapet. Damned if you do and damned if you don't! If I was Luisa, there is no way I'd want to be stuck in the kitchen for the exact reasons you gave.The business end of the program is in the pitching, the branding, marketing etc etc, NOT who's better at peeling potatoes/ stir-frying some noodles etc. Tactics and managing where you will be most effective/ less culpable is surely part and parcel of this whole 'interview' process surely? This is the Apprentice, not Masterchef after all! The marketing had to be most important this task because Lord Sugar wants to know who can spot a silly idea, who can run a business without being micromanaged, and who can sell their idea. Its also late on when there are too few bodies to do cooking well, the teams aremost unbalanced and the task has a basic flaw that what one sub team tastes isn't ever available to the people actually cooking it. It would be amazing if it did taste the same and luck whether it ended up too spicy or bland unless someone with a lot of experience cooked it. Neila nd Luisa both position themselves tactically. Luisa does it a bit better. You could perfectly well argue, though, that the important bit was to get the initial food choice right, and that was where your eating and cooking expertise needed to be. There was no point in having a better cook cooking something that was unsaleable anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#889 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
Quote:
Indeed. He doesn't want a cook.
The marketing had to be most important this task because Lord Sugar wants to know who can spot a silly idea, who can run a business without being micromanaged, and who can sell their idea. Its also late on when there are too few bodies to do cooking well, the teams aremost unbalanced and the task has a basic flaw that what one sub team tastes isn't ever available to the people actually cooking it. It would be amazing if it did taste the same and luck whether it ended up too spicy or bland unless someone with a lot of experience cooked it. Neila nd Luisa both position themselves tactically. Luisa does it a bit better. You could perfectly well argue, though, that the important bit was to get the initial food choice right, and that was where your eating and cooking expertise needed to be. There was no point in having a better cook cooking something that was unsaleable anyway. Tom won last year by being an inventor of products, not a branding expert, who can be employed as an when required. |
|
|
|
|
|
#890 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,430
|
I definitely think Alex' team would have won had they stuck with his geography idea. Neil's team were incredibly lucky this week considering nobody who tasted their product actually liked it. Is Fran stupid? Not even tasting the food to know if it needed extra seasoning etc. is just ridiculous. And it's Interesting how it was Neil's "boring" speech that got the team the most orders of the series though. (Well the most alongside his pitch to argos in week 3 which matched it)
Myles was horrendous this task and was incredibly rude to Leah throughout, interrupting throughout her pitch and then basically telling her to shut up in the br. Although I did have to laugh at Leah saying she was the most consistent, reliable person in the process. What has she actually done again? I remember her doing well leading her sub-team in week 1 and of course the cooking this week but I don't remember anything else she's done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#891 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
|
Quote:
An excellent reply to a rather odd post.
Luisa played a blinder in this episode, and it's a shame her detractors can't see past the dislike and be more objective. Even Karen who last week had marked her card had to admit that she was seeing a real business person beneath it all. As I always say about the Apprentice, you can always argue these things from more than one angle- I'd wager if she didn't say a word and meekly went and 'hid' in the kitchen because she was the best cook, then the criticism would be she was hiding after last week or keeping her head below the parapet. Damned if you do and damned if you don't! If I was Luisa, there is no way I'd want to be stuck in the kitchen for the exact reasons you gave.The business end of the program is in the pitching, the branding, marketing etc etc, NOT who's better at peeling potatoes/ stir-frying some noodles etc. Tactics and managing where you will be most effective/ less culpable is surely part and parcel of this whole 'interview' process surely? This is the Apprentice, not Masterchef after all! Luisa made ultimately the same mistake Kurt did on the caravan task; she tried to personally impress at the expense of the team's overall effort. Had they lost, it would have been a travesty for Luisa not to be fired. |
|
|
|
|
|
#892 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
|
Quote:
Tom won last year by being an inventor of products, not a branding expert, who can be employed as an when required. |
|
|
|
|
|
#893 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 9,275
|
Quote:
But managing where she'd be most effective is exactly where Luisa failed on this task. It's all very well to say that the branding is the business end, but all their efforts on the branding were sabotaged by the poor product. They were very lucky that the other team came up with a concept the supermarkets hated.
Luisa made ultimately the same mistake Kurt did on the caravan task; she tried to personally impress at the expense of the team's overall effort. Had they lost, it would have been a travesty for Luisa not to be fired. Would she have been better than Francesca in the kitchen? Without a doubt. Would the team been able to present/ market to the same level without Luisa? Probably, Neil would have been competent on this regardless of who was with him. Would Fran have made any significant contribution if she was with Neil? For me, I have my doubts. Do I think Luisa make a mistake by not going into the kitchen from an 'Apprentice TV show progression' point of view? Not in a million years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#894 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
|
Quote:
I completely take your points but on a tv show which this is, I disagree that she made the wrong choice, or failed on the task. In week 1, maybe this would have been an issue but at the latter stages, if you don't impress, or are seen to hide away, you're out.
Would she have been better than Francesca in the kitchen? Without a doubt. Would the team been able to present/ market to the same level without Luisa? Probably, Neil would have been competent on this regardless of who was with him. Would Fran have made any significant contribution if she was with Neil? For me, I have my doubts. Do I think Luisa make a mistake by not going into the kitchen from an 'Apprentice TV show progression' point of view? Not in a million years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#895 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
I completely take your points but on a tv show which this is, I disagree that she made the wrong choice, or failed on the task. In week 1, maybe this would have been an issue but at the latter stages, if you don't impress, or are seen to hide away, you're out.
Would she have been better than Francesca in the kitchen? Without a doubt. Would the team been able to present/ market to the same level without Luisa? Probably, Neil would have been competent on this regardless of who was with him. Would Fran have made any significant contribution if she was with Neil? For me, I have my doubts. Do I think Luisa make a mistake by not going into the kitchen from an 'Apprentice TV show progression' point of view? Not in a million years. All we, and the contestants do know on the key issue is that more often than not, but not always, the taste doesn't matter if the marketing works, and Lord Sugar isn't going to want a cook - but someone who doesn't produce dud ideas and can market whatever they are proposing. If you have only three people and don't want to have, or be, Neil making the key decision alone , the weakest team member is going to end up in the kitchen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#896 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,430
|
Quote:
We have no way of knowing that Luisa would have done better in the kitchen. The task was to reproduce a meal which whoever was cooking had never tasted. Unless you were used to those two types of cooking and their spicing it would be largely luck whether you put too much or too little spice in. Luisa makes cakes - not Thai food. We have no idea either what they reasonably expected the chef provided to do for them.He should at least have made sure someone tasted the result and discussed how much spice to add. . We also have no idea whether Neil would have come up with something as edible, or marketable without Luisa - he would have frozen Francesca out, and he's made big errors before. We also have no idea what their meal tasted like when it was put together with the specialist chef originally. it may have been a brilliant dish, or not. We just know no one else got to taste that meal.
All we, and the contestants do know on the key issue is that more often than not, but not always, the taste doesn't matter if the marketing works, and Lord Sugar isn't going to want a cook - but someone who doesn't produce dud ideas and can market whatever they are proposing. If you have only three people and don't want to have, or be, Neil making the key decision alone , the weakest team member is going to end up in the kitchen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#897 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,935
|
I've just caught up to the Dating and the Dinners episodes - I've only been dipping in and out of this, my first series of Apprentice.
Newbie observations: *I love Count Alex but it was right for him to go, he's too easily distracted - so far, I rather like his legal idea for the future. *I thought the sidekick's comments about Luisa's appalling bad manners in the Dating episode entirely apposite: she just bitched and bitched, without offering a single alternative suggestion (in the edit we saw, anyway). Her attempt to shaft the non-cook member of her staff was equally appalling imho. All I can see is someone who will do what it takes for her own success, regardless of her team, regardless of the customer. Chilling. *I'm also appalled (gee, I've been over-wrought :wink: ) that the winner of a food-related task should be the one with the marginally better packaging, despite the food tasting horrid, and the underlying fusion being apparently questionable. Heyho. Glad I'm not a business-person! |
|
|
|
|
|
#898 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
*I'm also appalled (gee, I've been over-wrought :wink: ) that the winner of a food-related task should be the one with the marginally better packaging, despite the food tasting horrid
|
|
|
|
|
|
#899 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,328
|
Post deleted.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34.



