I'm slightly torn on this one.
Whilst I agree that a skull wasn't exactly the right choice for a logo, just because it's the widely accepted danger/ poison logo, the overall idea wasn't as bad as many seem to be making out.
Over the years, many foodstuffs aimed at children have a similar kind of macabre theme and have been successful- Heinz did a load of different spaghetti shases- ghosts and ghouls for example and many confectioners have had ,fangs, teeth, blood etc for sweets. Also how many kids character brands are supernatural or horror based- Caspar the Friendly ghost anyone?
Ok not the best example but you get the gist. IMO people are going over the top with the stance against the deadly/ horror type theme.
I appreciate that you have to be extra careful with food, but in theory this could have worked and caught on if they had marketed the product slightly differently. I liked the 'boring bit for parents' blurb they put on the packaging and I think that if they had focused more on this to the adults/ buyers, and chosen a different logo then this may well have won the task.