Originally Posted by lammtarra:
“Indeed not, but I might worry about conditioning my child to believe that anything marked with a poison symbol (skull and crossbones) is edible.”
If you let your young child have access to poisons then the packaging of a ready meal is the least of your worries...
I've been surrounded by skull products since I was a baby and yet I managed get through GCSE and A-Level Chemistry without ever trying to eat, drink or wear any poisonous chemicals.
Originally Posted by indenile:
“A lot of products (e.g. clothing, stationery) have had skulls on them for a few years now. Just like one of the focus group mums, I never buy them for my kids. I have put things back that I might otherwise have purchased. And no, I don't think they are poisonous, just unpleasant and irrelevant to me. We all have different ideas about these things, so neutral is safer if you want to appeal to the widest possible market.
So there you have it.”
And yet the fact that there are so many skull products available would suggest that they do sell well and do appeal to a wide market...
Originally Posted by
DiamondDoll:
“Disagreeing about the use of a skull on a food product does not equate to having no sense.
I've got lots of sense and I dislike the imagery.
Hope thats clear enough for you.
”
I didn't say that it did equate to having no sense... I said that anyone who saw a ready meal on a supermarket shelf and thought it was actually poison because of a skull on the packaging, has no sense.
If you saw Deadly Dinners in the ready meal aisle of Waitrose would you think that there was poison in the meal? If yes, then you have no sense. If no, then my comment doesn't apply to you.
Get it?!