Originally Posted by slouchingthatch:
“I think we need to bear in mind that there's a need to exaggerate the differences between candidates so that we as viewers can put the relevant labels on them so we don't get confused. So Jordan became 'the obnoxious one', Luisa is 'the game-player', Leah is 'the Doctor', Francesca was 'the fair one' and Neil was 'the guy we loved to hate but eventually loved'. Consequently these aspects of their personalities get played up in the edit and subsequently on YF, where they're reacting to much the same material as us.
Neil was clearly one of the key redemption arcs of this season (Luisa is the other), almost in the mode of the classic flawed hero. (Karren Brady hinted as much when she mentioned an unnamed male candidate on YF in week 3, but I thought she meant Alex initially.)
All we saw initially was the pushiness and arrogance, what we later saw was someone who was willing to listen to feedback and then change, then we understood his motivation and the reason for his intense focus (his dad), and finally we saw that his core strength (his unshakeable self-belief) was actually his fatal flaw, as he refused to alter his business plan.
We were always meant to dislike him at first before joining him on his path to redemption, so that we felt sympathy for him after his downfall. This arc appeals to many viewers - but not to all.”
Very true.
However, while the editing can lie as well as position people in certain ways, I'm not sure it lies completely????
Really, it is a massive orchestration exercise (sounds painful

) as evidenced by often, how normal the candidates are in YF.
Neil did smile and laugh a bit and was very honest.
But all that stuff about letting everyone down - I can't help get back to what must have created all of that feeling that he has to deliver so much all the time.
We are complex beasts, that's for sure.