Originally Posted by xKatieLx:
“Well considering the amount of bitching you've did about the other team's work on the two tasks I've worked with you I just wanted to say I felt the 2 David's and George did a good job cause I think they did.
The reason I said I thought you should've been fired was because on two tasks your ideas have been bad from my point of view (I don't really think Ecuador was suitable for elderly and judging by the number of units you sold it wasn't). As for Zak's advice I just think you sounded a little rude to Jason and you were pulled up on it before that's all. It's Louise's choice and sadly I see why she fired Jason.
Also don't these two statements in bold kinda contradict each other?”
Katie, it's obvious that you don't like me, something that I'm totally fine with. I think that discrediting me for the sole purpose of statements I've made other weeks about other products that I didn't believe in as much as the one
I had a hand in making is completely fair. You don't know how our team functioned, you don't know how ideas were thrown around, and, most certainly, you don't know who performed well and who didn't. Don't pretend to understand me, or anyone else on my team, when you don't work with us.
I understand that Ecuador wasn't your first choice of travel ideas for this week, but if I have an idea, I'm not one to sit back and not mention it. I merely suggested the idea, and Carlisle fell in LOVE with the concept, and together we advocated for it. I was hardly pushing my idea down anyone's throat or anything like that. Also, where was I rude to Jason? I don't think I so much as mentioned his name anywhere in the boardroom. I also spoke well about him elsewhere on the forum today, so I have to think that the issue runs a bit deeper than that, Katie.
Before I go, I just want to remind you of something. After sending me a very viciously worded message about "making you look stupid," we both agreed, privately, that we were going to put bad blood behind us for tasks moving forward, a statement which you, quite frankly, lied about yourself. Since, apparently, you're not able or willing to do that, and since you're so good at hyperanalyzing every last line of text, I'd love to hear how you read this:
Please don't let your views of my personality or my work ethic distract from the fact that I'm serious about this competition. I don't spend every ten seconds saying you should get fired because I don't like you - which, believe me, I don't - and even went as far as to commend your work on the first task I worked with you, and still didn't think you should have been fired on the second task I worked with you on because there were more deserving people.
Did I contradict myself anywhere here?