|
||||||||
The Pro Cycling Thread (Part 2) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#276 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Froome incredible.... Quintana wonderful... Kennaugh brilliant
Loved today. I love it when the guys up front put their foot down, and the riders start popping out of the back... Oh the pain! But again questions will be asked about Froome's performance... He seems on another level to the rest of the peloton... Not only another level, another planet! God i hope he's clean. Cycling news forum must be in meltdown! PS. I did predict Froome Quintana... Just wish i put a couple of quid on them! :/ |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#277 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,792
|
I said yesterday that if he wanted to be sure of winning the Tour, Froome needed to do the attacking himself today - I'm rarely right but I'm glad I was today
![]() Nicely done by Sky, I've said they lack strength in depth this year, but at least they've figured out how to utilise what they have, and the rest day should help Porte and Kennaugh recover to stay with Froome long enough that he doesn't end up completely isolated on Tuesday. Froome looks as if he could cope with it anyway though, and he'll surely stay glued to the front of the peleton now to avoid a repeat of what Saxo Bank did the other day. Still testing days to come though - the TT should suit Froome, and not suit some of his main rivals, but Thursday-Saturday are all tricky stages, and I'd be surprised if Contador doesn't have something planned for the double Alpe d'Huez...unless he hasn't got the legs anymore, of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,792
|
Quote:
But again questions will be asked about Froome's performance... He seems on another level to the rest of the peloton... Not only another level, another planet!
God i hope he's clean. Sky are probably the most scrutinised team in the world, in any sport, if they were cheating, they'd be caught. Testing has never been more stringent, and they've passed everything. Why is it so hard to just believe that people are actually achieving great things and not cheating? Many riders have won the Tour in style before, clean riders have won on Ventoux before, so it's not as if Froome's actually doing anything completely remarkable at all. He's just doing it better than everyone else who's participating in the Tour this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#279 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 7,910
|
Quote:
Oh for goodness' sake! This is what I hate about cycling, why can't people just enjoy the Tour and not try to second guess or have suspicions about absolutely everything all of the time?!
Sky are probably the most scrutinised team in the world, in any sport, if they were cheating, they'd be caught. Testing has never been more stringent, and they've passed everything. Why is it so hard to just believe that people are actually achieving great things and not cheating? Many riders have won the Tour in style before, clean riders have won on Ventoux before, so it's not as if Froome's actually doing anything completely remarkable at all. He's just doing it better than everyone else who's participating in the Tour this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,274
|
Quote:
and they've passed everything
|
|
|
|
|
|
#281 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,298
|
Quote:
But again questions will be asked about Froome's performance... He seems on another level to the rest of the peloton... Not only another level, another planet!
There is a very simple difference between Sky and every other team out there, with the possible exception of GreenEdge. Professional, monitored, scinetifically backed out of competition training. The continental teams still believe that riding 150+ days a year is all the training you need. So they can never excel in the way Sky do. When you add in the 20 years of British Cyclings World Class programme of identifying talent - finding people who are naturally disposed to having the physiology to do well when trained and you have a very clear reason why Sky can do what they do. And they will keep on doing it. I can't wait to see what Kennaugh does over the next few years. What I can be sure of is that until the continental teams recognise that Cycling has moved on and out of competition training is required to succeed in the TdF that Sky will dominate |
|
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Darn Sarf
Posts: 28,724
|
Quote:
He won't be the last - Team Sky are shocking this year.
![]() ![]() ![]() Superb Sky, superb Froome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#283 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,298
|
Quote:
Remember someone called Lance Armstrong he never failed a drugs test by all accounts
He can't because they don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#284 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,792
|
Quote:
Remember someone called Lance Armstrong he never failed a drugs test by all accounts
Anyway: Quote:
Lance Armstrong DID fail drugs tests. the results were covered up by friends at the UCI. And before you say "maybe they're covering for Sky", remember Sky is British cycling, and the UCI detest British Cycling, have changed the rules of the sport to harm British Cycling's success and little would give Pat McQuaid more pleasure than being able to show Sky doping.
He can't because they don't. Funny how no-one was claiming Froome was doping last year when he finished second to Wiggins, when he wouldn't have been second at all if Wiggins hadn't been team leader and a better time triallist. But now that he's team leader.... Some people really do seem to just love to complain, see things that aren't there and think the worst of people |
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Superb Sky, superb Froome. ![]() Their tactics on the 'ordinary' stages when things go a bit different to what they think is the script are still shocking though
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,298
|
Quote:
Funny how no-one was claiming Froome was doping last year when he finished second to Wiggins, when he wouldn't have been second at all if Wiggins hadn't been team leader and a better time triallist. But now that he's team leader....
He only has 4 minutes currently on a pack of riders between 4 and 5 back. This is therefore exactly in line with last year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
Did you miss the bit of my post where I said that testing is more stringent than it has ever been before?
Anyway: Exactly. Funny how no-one was claiming Froome was doping last year when he finished second to Wiggins, when he wouldn't have been second at all if Wiggins hadn't been team leader and a better time triallist. But now that he's team leader.... Some people really do seem to just love to complain, see things that aren't there and think the worst of people Using their reference that Froome/Sky are doping who exactly is in the frame to be clean and beat the dopers? Can anyone clean beat systematic and what would appear to be such a professional system that there has not been so much as a whisper about norty doings? Is it just more that it is Froome/Sky than anything else? ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,298
|
Quote:
![]() Their tactics on the 'ordinary' stages when things go a bit different to what they think is the script are still shocking though ![]() They will be even stronger than they are with a bit more flexibility and taking account of how someone's mental performance will effect them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
Oh for goodness' sake! This is what I hate about cycling, why can't people just enjoy the Tour and not try to second guess or have suspicions about absolutely everything all of the time?!
Sky are probably the most scrutinised team in the world, in any sport, if they were cheating, they'd be caught. Testing has never been more stringent, and they've passed everything. Why is it so hard to just believe that people are actually achieving great things and not cheating? Many riders have won the Tour in style before, clean riders have won on Ventoux before, so it's not as if Froome's actually doing anything completely remarkable at all. He's just doing it better than everyone else who's participating in the Tour this year. If that makes any sense. :/ I and you don't really know... Chris does, and he says he doesn't dope... Fair enough. Being born and brought up in Kenya (rift valley) must have an effect on his metabolism. Like the Kenyan distance runners.... I'm not going to, or try to explain, but i'm sure that must be of some help. At the moment Chris is so much better then any other cyclist... With the history of this sport, sadly questions will be asked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,298
|
Quote:
At the moment Chris is so much better then any other cyclist... With the history of this sport, sadly questions will be asked.
![]() Lance Armstrong admits to doping. Most if not ALL of his competition at the time he was riding have turned out to be using performance enhancing drugs. You can extrapolate this to say that Armstrong would have won his 7 tours if no-one had been doping. And he would have been comparatively head and shoulders above them all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Froome not the fastest to climb Mont Ventoux...
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...13103522034028 |
|
|
|
|
|
#292 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,792
|
Quote:
With the history of this sport, sadly questions will be asked.
![]() Innocent until proven guilty is the general rule, so why cycling fans can't abide by that, I don't know. Funnily enough, not being negative all the time actually makes watching the race more enjoyable Quote:
Is it just more that it is Froome/Sky than anything else?
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#293 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
If Sky have a weakness its that they only thing they seem to use for selection is performance data. Presumably Lopez and Kiryienka put out better power data than Bernie Eisel but I'd pick Eisel every single time over those two because his race head is far superior.
They will be even stronger than they are with a bit more flexibility and taking account of how someone's mental performance will effect them. A good percentage of cycling is headology - maybe even as much as 50%. Merckx was the master and Armstrong understood it completely. It's also where Indurain had the beating of Rominger. It's no good having the legs if your head is telling you that you're second 'cos that what you will be. A team with an Eisel is worth far more in headology stakes to another team assessing the Team Sky weak points. |
|
|
|
|
|
#294 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,439
|
Quote:
Remember someone called Lance Armstrong he never failed a drugs test by all accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#295 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
He did fail a drug test. But it got covered up. The French lab even said they had a positive test but somehow he was never charged.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/g...s-8577491.html And i've just read today stage thread over at the Cycling news forum.... Funny as ****!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#296 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,674
|
Quote:
Did you miss the bit of my post where I said that testing is more stringent than it has ever been before?
Anyway: Exactly. Funny how no-one was claiming Froome was doping last year when he finished second to Wiggins, when he wouldn't have been second at all if Wiggins hadn't been team leader and a better time triallist. But now that he's team leader.... Some people really do seem to just love to complain, see things that aren't there and think the worst of people |
|
|
|
|
|
#297 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,274
|
I just spent a bit of time on StreetView exploring the route of next Wednesday's time trial, and the route round from Alpe d'Huez back to Bourg d'Oisans on Thursday.
Ummm, challenging is putting it very mildly for both of them. The time trial course is very twisty and fairly steep in places, while the Col de Sarenne appears to be little more than a mountain goat track. |
|
|
|
|
|
#298 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,625
|
Quote:
Why is it so hard to just believe that people are actually achieving great things and not cheating?
Er, because history suggests otherwise. Just taking the 'winners' from the last 2 decades or so: 1996 winner - Bjarne Riis - doped 1997 winner - Jan Ulrich - doped 1998 winner - Marco Pantani - tested positive in 1999, served a ban and missed that year's Tour 1999-2005 - What's the guy's name? 2006 winner - Floyd Landis - Subsequently failed a drugs test and stripped of win 2007 - Michael Rasmussen. Comfortably leading when thrown out for missing drugs tests and lying about whereabouts 2007 and 2009 winner - Alberto Contador - Also 'won' the 2010 Tour but later failed a drugs test. Was stripped of his 2010 win and served a ban. Perhaps you're right though. Maybe people should just enjoy The Tour and not have these suspicions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12,247
|
Trouble is like with athletics people will see cycling as having a certain reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#300 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dagenham, Essex.
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
2007 - Michael Rasmussen. Comfortably leading when thrown out for missing drugs tests and lying about whereabouts
Quote:
EPO, growth hormone, testosterone, DHEA, insulin, IGF-1, cortisone and blood transfusions
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41.





