Originally Posted by cmq2:
“Reviewing the video, it is quite incriminating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JykTgUoNMN8
Nibali could have legitimately argued he was not attacking the yellow jersey as he was too far back on GC. Or, he could have said he did not know why he was going back. "I did not see him" does not cut the ice.”
“Reviewing the video, it is quite incriminating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JykTgUoNMN8
Nibali could have legitimately argued he was not attacking the yellow jersey as he was too far back on GC. Or, he could have said he did not know why he was going back. "I did not see him" does not cut the ice.”
For me, it's not that his attack is likely to make any real difference GC-wise, it's the fact that, rightly-or-wrongly (well, wrongly, I suppose), Nibali THOUGHT he could gain some kind of advantage by attacking, and that says something about his character. It was a scumbag move.




American TV obviously hasn't started yet, so no Phil & Paul.