Originally Posted by sunnymeg:
“The last missed test was due to a family member being ill. We know the family member concerned and they were rushed to hospital with a suspected heart attack.”
“The last missed test was due to a family member being ill. We know the family member concerned and they were rushed to hospital with a suspected heart attack.”
Armitstead herself though did not contest that she was at fault in this instance. As you are prepared to elucidate regarding this, perhaps you could provide some more information. Was this a close family member, did Armitstead attend the hospital as soon as she found out, and did she inform the testing authorities at the time she was not available for testing as she was visiting a sick relative? If not, was her phone switched on, was she contacted by the testers, and did she explain to them why she was unavailable?
Secondly, what were her reasons for missing the other test?.
Originally Posted by Virtual Paul:
“From an outsider it seems obvious that a certain testing window should be allowed.”
“From an outsider it seems obvious that a certain testing window should be allowed.”
Increasing the window any more would mean even more dopers slipping through the net. As I said earlier, many PEDs are only traceable for a short period of time.




[only kidding]