Originally Posted by codeblue:
“It was definitely a red card.
It was reckless, late and deliberate. It wasn't just a mistimed tackle.
We are only debating it because the ref bottled a worse tackle afterwards.
The simple answer is that they were both red cards,”
The Rafael tackle wasn't half as bad as people are making out. Yes, his feet left the ground, but the same could have been said for Luiz's forarm smash on Valencia in the first half. By the time he played the ball, his feet were in a safe position, Cahill didn't flinch, didn't jump to avoid him nor did he stop himself from going into the challenge. When Rafael won the ball, Cahill fell over his legs, he wasn't thrown into the air, kicked on the shins or thigh. Had it been late or mistimed it would have deserved a red card, but he executed that type of tackle, which isn't reckless, it can be dangerous but in this case wasn't.
A lot of the frustration toward Rafael, in many ways was down to a challenge in the box a minute or so earlier when I think Ivonvic went down after going for a header, and rode all over Rafael's back. As the tv panned on him, Ramires had a go at Rafael, elbowing him the ribs. This was mentioned in commentary, though not shown. Rafael was also targeted through out for some rough house stuff today, so while it wasn't the greatest tackle he's made, and he probably had seen a little red mist, it wasn't half as bad as being made out.
It was a good game today, to fairly even sides (on the day), two bad defensive errors on corners won the game for you guys. We can't complain over that, so well done. On a positive note I actually thought the duel between Rafael and Hazard was wonderful, a good old fashioned full back/wide man duel, with no winner.