...bulsh!tting.
Jordan is probably worse than Stuart Baggs in terms of ...
I disagree with regards to his performance across the tasks.
However, he is utterly stupid to go through ten long weeks in the process with an idea at the end that he doesn't even own. Deserved to go first and quickly seeing as it wasn't his idea.
However, I stand by my conviction that his task performances merited an interviews place and I still think he was one of the better task performers.
However, he is utterly stupid to go through ten long weeks in the process with an idea at the end that he doesn't even own. Deserved to go first and quickly seeing as it wasn't his idea.
However, I stand by my conviction that his task performances merited an interviews place and I still think he was one of the better task performers.
Originally Posted by TXF0429:
“I disagree with regards to his performance across the tasks.
However, he is utterly stupid to go through ten long weeks in the process with an idea at the end that he doesn't even own. Deserved to go first and quickly seeing as it wasn't his idea.
However, I stand by my conviction that his task performances merited an interviews place and I still think he was one of the better task performers.”
“I disagree with regards to his performance across the tasks.
However, he is utterly stupid to go through ten long weeks in the process with an idea at the end that he doesn't even own. Deserved to go first and quickly seeing as it wasn't his idea.
However, I stand by my conviction that his task performances merited an interviews place and I still think he was one of the better task performers.”
Combination of right team-right task and good delegating when he was PM imo.
It was not by chance that he was left to the interview stage so that his humiliation could be total. Lol, what an absolute idiot.
What nonsense! Jordan boasts he can solve a Rubik's cube in under 3 minutes; Baggs can provide a field of ponies. What planet are people on to compare the two?!? Jordan's business plan was a big mistake. Does this mean everyone forgets what he contributed? At the end he was described as a facilitator rather than a doer - hello, isn't that a good type of manager. (That's rhetorical.)
LS didn't tell Jordan he was full of s hit. Because he's not. But I'm not sure about those who think Jordan's worse than Baggsy.
LS didn't tell Jordan he was full of s hit. Because he's not. But I'm not sure about those who think Jordan's worse than Baggsy.
Originally Posted by Poppysinbloom:
“What nonsense! Jordan boasts he can solve a Rubik's cube in under 3 minutes; Baggs can provide a field of ponies. What planet are people on to compare the two?!? Jordan's business plan was a big mistake. Does this mean everyone forgets what he contributed? At the end he was described as a facilitator rather than a doer - hello, isn't that a good type of manager. (That's rhetorical.)
LS didn't tell Jordan he was full of s hit. Because he's not. But I'm not sure about those who think Jordan's worse than Baggsy.”
“What nonsense! Jordan boasts he can solve a Rubik's cube in under 3 minutes; Baggs can provide a field of ponies. What planet are people on to compare the two?!? Jordan's business plan was a big mistake. Does this mean everyone forgets what he contributed? At the end he was described as a facilitator rather than a doer - hello, isn't that a good type of manager. (That's rhetorical.)
LS didn't tell Jordan he was full of s hit. Because he's not. But I'm not sure about those who think Jordan's worse than Baggsy.”
Correct. He forgot that it wasn't his business, the twerp.
Originally Posted by TXF0429:
“I disagree with regards to his performance across the tasks.”
“I disagree with regards to his performance across the tasks.”
To be fair, if you look purely at performance on tasks and nothing to do with demeanour or attitude, Stuart actually didn't perform that badly. He was only in the boardroom three times across ten tasks. He was a good salesperson, and while being a real irritant to work with, he generally did get things done. I'm not saying that he should have won or anything because a lot of it is to do with personality, but he did have more capabilities than he is often given credit for.
