Originally Posted by Gloria Fandango:
“During the interviews didn't one of the interviewers recount that she had described herself as the most attractive candidate with the most voluminous hair (or words to that effect)?”
Not quite. She's noted from Leah's CV that Leah thought she was the most
glamorous with the most voluminous hair.
Not that it makes any difference as your point still stands.
Having said that, I still wonder what prompted Leah to talk about her looks so heavily in her CV (which is what the interviewer was trying to address). If it was to promote the idea that her looks would be an asset to her business, it'd be problematic because - as Leah noted - she's 24 years old, which show she has youth on her side, but she would be promoting an idealism that may not be acceptable for ASA (Advertising Standards Authority).
I would invest in her business, but I'd want some kind of insurance that wouldn't attract lawsuits. A clinic-shop database to keep track of users, one-offs and regulars, and compulsory consent release forms, for instance.